Two novel locally ideal three-period unit commitment formulations in power systems

Abstract The thermal unit commitment problem has historically been formulated as a mixed integer quadratic programming problem, which is difficult to solve efficiently, especially for large-scale systems. The tighter characteristic reduces the search space; therefore, as a natural consequence, it significantly reduces the computational burden. In the literature, many tightened formulations for a single unit with parts of constraints were reported without a clear derivation process. In this paper, a systematic approach is developed to create tight formulations. The idea is to use new variables in high-dimensional space to capture all the states of a single unit within three periods and then use these state variables systematically to derive three-period locally ideal expressions for a subset of the constraints in unit commitment. Meanwhile, the linear dependence of those new state variables is leveraged to keep the compactness of the obtained formulations. Based on this approach, we propose two tight models. The proposed models and other four state-of-the-art models are tested on 56 instances over a scheduling period of 24 h for systems ranging from 10 to 1080 generating units. The simulation results show that our proposed unit commitment formulations are tighter and more efficient (Increased by 13.6%) than other state-of-the-art models. After transforming our models into mixed integer linear programming formulations, our models are still tighter and more efficient (Increased by 67.3%) than other models.

[1]  Jiangfeng Zhang,et al.  Low-carbon economic dispatch for electricity and natural gas systems considering carbon capture systems and power-to-gas , 2018, Applied Energy.

[2]  Miguel F. Anjos,et al.  Unit Commitment in Electric Energy Systems , 2017 .

[3]  M. Carrion,et al.  A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Zhen Yang,et al.  Optimal scheduling of isolated microgrid with an electric vehicle battery swapping station in multi-stakeholder scenarios: A bi-level programming approach via real-time pricing , 2018, Applied Energy.

[5]  J. Jian,et al.  Tight Relaxation Method for Unit Commitment Problem Using Reformulation and Lift-and-Project , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Yan Xu,et al.  A novel projected two-binary-variable formulation for unit commitmentin power systems , 2017 .

[7]  D. P. Kothari,et al.  A solution to the unit commitment problem—a review , 2013 .

[8]  Philip Ogunbona,et al.  Economic-emission dispatch problem: A semi-definite programming approach , 2014 .

[9]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  Multiple Perspective-Cuts Outer Approximation Method for Risk-Averse Operational Planning of Regional Energy Service Providers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[10]  Manfred Padberg,et al.  Location, Scheduling, Design and Integer Programming , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[11]  Suvrajeet Sen,et al.  A State Transition MIP Formulation for the Unit Commitment Problem , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  L. L. Garver,et al.  Power Generation Scheduling by Integer Programming-Development of Theory , 1962, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[13]  Robert Fildes,et al.  Short term electricity demand forecasting using partially linear additive quantile regression with an application to the unit commitment problem , 2018, Applied Energy.

[14]  G. Nemhauser,et al.  Integer Programming , 2020 .

[15]  C. Gentile,et al.  Tighter Approximated MILP Formulations for Unit Commitment Problems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  A. Conejo,et al.  Optimal response of a thermal unit to an electricity spot market , 2000 .

[17]  R. Jabr Tight polyhedral approximation for mixed-integer linear programming unit commitment formulations , 2012 .

[18]  Kenneth Bruninx,et al.  Impact of generator start-up lead times on short-term scheduling with high shares of renewables , 2020 .

[19]  Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo,et al.  A semi-analytical non-iterative primary approach based on priority list to solve unit commitment problem , 2015 .

[20]  Claudio Gentile,et al.  A tight MIP formulation of the unit commitment problem with start-up and shut-down constraints , 2017, EURO J. Comput. Optim..

[21]  M. Anjos,et al.  Tight Mixed Integer Linear Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  J. Latorre,et al.  Tight and Compact MILP Formulation for the Thermal Unit Commitment Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  Alper Atamtürk,et al.  A polyhedral study of production ramping , 2016, Math. Program..

[24]  C. Kang,et al.  Distributed real-time demand response based on Lagrangian multiplier optimal selection approach ☆ , 2017 .

[25]  Shuang Wu,et al.  Research on joint optimal dispatching method for hybrid power system considering system security , 2019, Applied Energy.

[26]  Tony Roskilly,et al.  Dynamic programming for optimal operation of a biofuel micro CHP-HES system , 2017 .