Users' guides to the medical literature. XI. How to use an article about a clinical utilization review. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

CLINICAL SCENARIO You are a general internist attending a medical advisory committee meeting as the newly appointed chief of staff in a large community hospital affiliated with a major health maintenance organization. A junior administrator presents data showing that the hospital's utilization of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is high relative to similar-sized centers with similar numbers of interventional cardiologists. He insinuates that unnecessary PTCAs are being done. The cardiologists present are infuriated, and the meeting degenerates into a shouting match. After the hospital chief executive officer brings the meeting back to order, you and the chief of cardiology agree to research the matter independently and report back in 1 week. THE SEARCH Raw utilization data are insufficient to assess whether cardiologists at your hospital are using PTCA inappropriately. You need to review their practice in light of criteria for deciding whether each application of PTCA was likely, given a

[1]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: X. How to Use an Article Reporting Variations in the Outcomes of Health Services , 1996 .

[2]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. X. How to use an article reporting variations in the outcomes of health services. The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[3]  R S Hayward,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: VIII. How to Use Clinical Practice Guidelines B. What Are the Recommendations and Will They Help You in Caring for Your Patients? , 1995 .

[4]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Validity of criteria used for detecting underuse of coronary revascularization. , 1995, JAMA.

[5]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: VIII. How to Use Clinical Practice Guidelines A. Are the Recommendations Valid? , 1995 .

[6]  A S Detsky,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. VII. How to use a clinical decision analysis. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence Based Medicine Working Group. , 1995, JAMA.

[7]  Detsky As,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. VII. How to use a clinical decision analysis. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? Evidence Based Medicine Working Group. , 1995, JAMA.

[8]  A S Detsky,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. VII: How to use a clinical decision analysis : a are the results of the study valid ? , 1995 .

[9]  C. Naylor Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine , 1995, The Lancet.

[10]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 1994, JAMA.

[11]  M. Kutner,et al.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass Surgery , 1994 .

[12]  C. Hamm,et al.  A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI) , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Gordon H. Guyatt,et al.  Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: II. How to Use an Article About Therapy or Prevention B. What Were the Results and Will They Help Me in Caring for My Patients? , 1994 .

[14]  G H Guyatt,et al.  USERS' GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE. II: HOW TO USE AN ARTICLE ABOUT THERAPY OR PREVENTION A. ARE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY VALID ? , 1993 .

[15]  I. Palacios,et al.  Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in-hospital results and 1-year follow-up. ERACI Group. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  E. Ribeiro,et al.  Randomized trial of direct coronary angioplasty versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  J. Reiber,et al.  A comparison of immediate coronary angioplasty with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  K. Bailey,et al.  Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. The Mayo Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory Groups. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  J O'Keefe,et al.  A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1993 .

[20]  Joy,et al.  Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial. , 1993, Lancet.

[21]  RITA-2 trial participants Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial , 1993, The Lancet.

[22]  Indications for cholecystectomy: the results of a consensus panel approach. , 1993, Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care.

[23]  L. Leape,et al.  The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. , 1993, JAMA.

[24]  L. Leape,et al.  The appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. , 1993, JAMA.

[25]  P. Hartigan,et al.  A comparison of angioplasty with medical therapy in the treatment of single-vessel coronary artery disease. Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  A. Basiński Quality of care: 2. Quality of care studies and their consequences. Health Services Research Group. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[27]  L. Leape,et al.  Group judgments of appropriateness: the effect of panel composition. , 1992, Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care.

[28]  K L Posner,et al.  Effect of outcome on physician judgments of appropriateness of care. , 1991, JAMA.

[29]  D. Ronis,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Utilization Review Criteria: Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, Standardized Medreview Instrument, and Intensity-Severity-Discharge Criteria , 1990, Medical care.

[30]  J. Wittes,et al.  Overview of results of randomized clinical trials in heart disease. I. Treatments following myocardial infarction. , 1988, JAMA.

[31]  R. Brook,et al.  DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF CORONARY DISEASE: COMPARISON OF DOCTORS' ATTITUDES IN THE USA AND THE UK , 1988, The Lancet.

[32]  K. Kahn,et al.  Measuring the Clinical Appropriateness of the Use of a Procedure Can We Do It? , 1988, Medical care.

[33]  K. Kahn,et al.  The effect of comorbidity on appropriateness ratings for two gastrointestinal procedures. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  R. Brook,et al.  Sufficiency of clinical literature on the appropriate uses of six medical and surgical procedures. , 1987, The Western journal of medicine.

[35]  R H Brook,et al.  A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical Technologies , 1986, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.