Anchoring and Yea-saying with Private Goods: An Experiment

This book explores frontier work at the intersection of experimental and environmental economics, with cutting edge research provided by premier scholars in the field. The book begins by focusing on improving benefit–cost analysis, which remains the hallmark of public policy decision-making around the globe. The contributors provide innovative avenues to credibly lead to more efficient policies. T

[1]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  Testing Explanations of Preference Reversal , 2004 .

[2]  Randall A. Kramer,et al.  An Independent Sample Test of Yea-Saying and Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation , 1995 .

[3]  David S. Brookshire,et al.  An experiment on the economic value of visibility , 1980 .

[4]  Jean-Paul Chavas,et al.  Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: A Comparison of Nonmarket Techniques , 1985 .

[5]  David S. Brookshire,et al.  Valuing Public Goods: A Comparison of Survey and Hedonic Approaches , 1982 .

[6]  John Quiggin,et al.  Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up Questionnaire , 1994 .

[7]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[8]  Robert K. Davis.  Recreation Planning as an Economic Problem , 1963 .

[9]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies , 1995 .

[10]  Edgar Crane,et al.  Response Bias, Yea-Saying, and the Double Negative , 1975 .

[11]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment. , 1971 .

[12]  John R. Stoll,et al.  Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource , 1988 .

[13]  Jean C. Buzby,et al.  Differences between continuous and discrete contingent value estimates , 1996 .

[14]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models , 1992 .

[15]  Valuing Wildlife in Benefit-C A Case Study Involving Endangered Species , .

[16]  D. Ariely,et al.  “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences , 2003 .

[17]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Accuracy in Valuation Is a Matter of Degree , 1988 .

[18]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good , 1996 .

[19]  Alan Randall,et al.  A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation , 1987 .

[20]  Barbara Kanninen,et al.  Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation , 1995 .

[21]  Arthur van Soest,et al.  A Test for Anchoring and Yea-Saying in Experimental Consumption Data , 2004 .

[22]  I. Bateman,et al.  A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 1997 .

[23]  Jason F. Shogren,et al.  Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning , 1996 .

[24]  Mary Jo Kealy,et al.  Contingent Valuation of Environmental Assets: Comparison with a Stimulated Market , 1983 .

[25]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Welfare Measurements Using Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of Techniques , 1988 .