The tendon organs of cat medial gastrocnemius: significance of motor unit type and size for the activation of Ib afferents.

1. Histological and histochemical studies suggest that each tendon organ in a mixed mammalian muscle should be particularly responsive to the contraction of a discrete number of motor units (ca. ten to fifteen), each with differing mechanical properties. This report describes physiological experiments that demonstrate this arrangement for the tendon organs of cat medial gastrocnemius. 2. No correlations could be found between the intensity of discharge of a single tendon organ and the contraction strengths of motor units whose contraction excited the receptor. Tendon organs were found to be as responsive to contraction of small slow twitch units as they were to contraction of larger fast twitch units. Taking the data as a whole, the apparent sensitivity of the receptors during motor unit contractions (pps/force recorded at the tendon) was inversely related to the contraction strengths of the motor units. 3. These findings are discussed in relation to recent evidence on the territory of single motor units in medial gastrocnemius and the force producing capabilities of their individual muscle fibres. It is concluded that in general each motor unit, whose contraction excites a given receptor, contributes one muscle fibre to the receptor capsule. Further, it appears that the various excitatory effects of those muscle fibres inserting into a given receptor capsule are not simply related to their relative contraction strengths but also depend on the details of the mechanical coupling between each fibre and the Ib afferent receptor endings. 4. The results of an ensemble analysis show that despite the lack of correlation between the intensity of tendon organ discharge and the force developed at the tendon during contraction of different motor units, a correlation does appear when the responses of several tendon organs and the forces developed by the motor units which excite them are summed progressively. This finding has implications for the recruitment order of motor units in that the profile of the collective Ib response is shown to differ according to whether motor unit forces are summed randomly or in order of increasing contraction strengths.

[1]  P. Matthews,et al.  Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions , 1974 .

[2]  R. Close.  Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. , 1972, Physiological reviews.

[3]  J. Houk,et al.  An evaluation of length and force feedback to soleus muscles of decerebrate cats. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  C. Bridgman.  The structure of tendon organs in the cat: A proposed mechanism for responding to muscle tension , 1968, The Anatomical record.

[5]  L. Edström,et al.  Differential histochemical effects of muscle contractions on phosphorylase and glycogen in various types of fibres: relation to fatigue. , 1968, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  D. M. Lewis,et al.  Further observations on the differentiation of skeletal muscles in the kitten hind limb , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  D. Barker,et al.  The Morphology of Muscle Receptors , 1974 .

[8]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Motor Unit Properties and Selective Involvement In Movement , 1975, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[9]  J A Stephens,et al.  Tendon organs of cat medial gastrocnemius: responses to active and passive forces as a function of muscle length. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  The motor units of cat medial gastrocnemius: Speed-size relations and their significance for the recruitment order of motor units , 1975, Brain Research.

[11]  J. Swett,et al.  The fine structure of the Golgi tendon organ , 1972, Journal of neurocytology.

[12]  G. E. Goslow,et al.  The cat step cycle: Hind limb joint angles and muscle lengths during unrestrained locomotion , 1973, Journal of morphology.

[13]  J E SWETT,et al.  Distribution and numbers of stretch receptors in medial gastrocnemius and soleus muscles of the cat , 1960 .

[14]  S. Grillner.  The role of muscle stiffness in meeting the changing postural and locomotor requirements for force development by the ankle extensors. , 1972, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  Motor unit area in a rat muscle. , 1961, The American journal of physiology.

[16]  R. E. Burke,et al.  Mammalian Motor Units: Physiological-Histochemical Correlation in Three Types in Cat Gastrocnemius , 1971, Science.

[17]  J. Houk,et al.  Responses of Golgi tendon organs to active contractions of the soleus muscle of the cat. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  J Bagust,et al.  Isometric contractions of motor units in a fast twitch muscle of the cat , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  V. Edgerton,et al.  HINDLIMB MUSCLE FIBER POPULATIONS OF FIVE MAMMALS , 1973 .

[20]  J A Stephens,et al.  The motor units of cat medial gastrocnemius: Electrical and mechanical properties as a function of muscle length , 1975, Journal of morphology.

[21]  R. Burke,et al.  Anatomy and innervation ratios in motor units of cat gastrocnemius , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  P. Matthews,et al.  The response of de‐efferented muscle spindle receptors to stretching at different velocities , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  R. L. Gerlach,et al.  Fatigability of Medial Gastrocnemius Motor Units in the Cat , 1973 .

[24]  J. Swett,et al.  Ultrastructural organization of the sensory fibers innervating the Golgi tendon organ , 1974, The Anatomical record.

[25]  D. Levine,et al.  Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  E. Henneman,et al.  PROPERTIES OF MOTOR UNITS IN A HOMOGENEOUS RED MUSCLE (SOLEUS) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.