Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: Frequency-place functions and rate pitch

Eight cochlear implant users with near-normal hearing in their non-implanted ear compared pitch percepts for pulsatile electric and acoustic pure-tone stimuli presented to the two ears. Six subjects were implanted with a 31-mm MED-EL FLEX(SOFT) electrode, and two with a 24-mm medium (M) electrode, with insertion angles of the most apical contacts ranging from 565° to 758°. In the first experiment, frequency-place functions were derived from pure-tone matches to 1500-pps unmodulated pulse trains presented to individual electrodes and compared to Greenwood's frequency position map along the organ of Corti. While the overall median downward shift of the obtained frequency-place functions (-0.16 octaves re. Greenwood) and the mean shifts in the basal (<240°; -0.33 octaves) and middle (-0.35 octaves) regions were statistically significant, the shift in the apical region (>480°; 0.26 octaves) was not. Standard deviations of frequency-place functions were approximately half an octave at electrode insertion angles below 480°, increasing to an octave at higher angular locations while individual functions were gradually leveling off. In a second experiment, subjects matched the rates of unmodulated pulse trains presented to individual electrodes in the apical half of the array to low-frequency pure tones between 100 Hz and 450 Hz. The aim was to investigate the influence of electrode place on the salience of temporal pitch cues, for coding strategies that present temporal fine structure information via rate modulations on select apical channels. Most subjects achieved reliable matches to tone frequencies from 100 Hz to 300 Hz only on electrodes at angular insertion depths beyond 360°, while rate-matches to 450-Hz tones were primarily achieved on electrodes at shallower insertion angles. Only for electrodes in the second turn the average slopes of rate-pitch functions did not differ significantly from the pure-tone references, suggesting their use for the encoding of within-channel fine frequency information via rate modulations in temporal fine structure stimulation strategies.

[1]  Alexandra Kaider,et al.  A New Fine Structure Speech Coding Strategy: Speech Perception at a Reduced Number of Channels , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  U. Baumann,et al.  Pitch Matching Psychometrics in Electric Acoustic Stimulation , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Gerald E Loeb,et al.  Are cochlear implant patients suffering from perceptual dissonance? , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Ying-Yee Kong,et al.  Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  W. Wundt,et al.  Grundzüge der physiologischen psyhcologie , 1893 .

[6]  Peter Nopp,et al.  Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: An evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus , 2008, Hearing Research.

[7]  Clemens Zierhofer,et al.  Temporal fine structure in cochlear implants: Preliminary speech perception results in Cantonese-speaking implant users , 2010, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  D. D. Greenwood.  Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .

[9]  Ernst Terhardt,et al.  Calculating virtual pitch , 1979, Hearing Research.

[10]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Relative importance of temporal envelope and fine structure in lexical-tone perception. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. Meddis,et al.  A unitary model of pitch perception. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. L. Goldstein.  An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[15]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Koch Sigmund Ed,et al.  Psychology: A Study of A Science , 1962 .

[17]  M F Dorman,et al.  The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Ilona Anderson,et al.  Incapacitating Unilateral Tinnitus in Single-Sided Deafness Treated by Cochlear Implantation , 2008, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[19]  G. Clark,et al.  Psychophysical studies evaluating the feasibility of a speech processing strategy for a multiple-channel cochlear implant. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[21]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[22]  D. D. Greenwood.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  C. Bray,et al.  Present possibilities for auditory theory. , 1930 .

[24]  Hugh McDermott,et al.  Electro-Acoustic Stimulation , 2009, Audiology and Neurotology.

[25]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Changes in Pitch with a Cochlear Implant Over Time , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[26]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Cochlear Implant Speech Processor Frequency Allocations May Influence Pitch Perception , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[29]  Clemens Zierhofer,et al.  Clinical Trial Results with the MED-EL Fine Structure Processing Coding Strategy in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users , 2012, ORL.

[30]  E LlanezaRodriguez.  Theory of hearing , 1951 .

[31]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Pitch Comparisons between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Normal-hearing Contralateral Ear , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[32]  Manabu Sakuta,et al.  [one hundred books which built up neurology (52)--Hermann von Helmholtz "Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grundlage fur die Theorie der Musik" (1863)]. , 2011, Brain and nerve = Shinkei kenkyu no shinpo.

[33]  Louise Loiselle,et al.  An Electric Frequency-to-place Map for a Cochlear Implant Patient with Hearing in the Nonimplanted Ear , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[34]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Acoustic to Electric Pitch Comparisons in Cochlear Implant Subjects with Residual Hearing , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[35]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Relative Importance of Rate and Place: Experiments Using Pitch Scaling Techniques with Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[36]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations , 1996, Hearing Research.

[37]  Uwe Baumann,et al.  The cochlear implant electrode–pitch function , 2006, Hearing Research.

[38]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[39]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Effect of stimulus level and place of stimulation on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant users. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.