Identifying and managing coordination complexity in global product development project

Abstract The complexity of communication and coordination stemming from teams distributed across geographic locations and time zones is a fundamental feature of the global product development (GPD) project. The GPD project is also a complex web of interactions involving many overlapped activities and interdependent components. In order to manage coordination complexity, this paper presents a systematic method for identifying and measuring coordination drivers and coordination barriers in GPD projects. For characterizing coordination drivers, this paper builds quantitative models to measure dependency strengths related to product features and overlapped processes based on Multi-Domain Matrix (MDM) and Design Structure Matrix (DSM). For characterizing coordination barriers, the concepts of daily overlapping working hours ratio and relative spatial distance between GPD teams are presented for modeling dependency strengths related to temporal separation and spatial distance. Further, this paper proposes a new dependency rating scheme of organization DSM to evaluate the integrated coordinative dependency strength (ICDS). A two-stage clustering criteria minimizing the total coordination cost is used to reduce complexity of GPD organization. An industrial example is provided to illustrate the proposed models. Optimization results provide a more integrated managerial insight for evaluating ICDS and reducing total coordination cost.

[1]  Christian Terwiesch,et al.  Product Development and Concurrent Engineering , 2000 .

[2]  T. Allen Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[3]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering , 1998 .

[4]  Audris Mockus,et al.  An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally Distributed Software Development , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[5]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Sloan School of Management Working Paper Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunications Industry Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: an Empirical Study in the Telecommunica , 2022 .

[6]  Christoph Meier,et al.  Systematic module and interface definition using component design structure matrix , 2010 .

[7]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Organizing Global Product Development for Complex Engineered Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  Tony Gorschek,et al.  Empirical evidence in global software engineering: a systematic review , 2010, Empirical Software Engineering.

[9]  Madhu T. Rao,et al.  Key Issues for Global it Sourcing: Country and Individual Factors , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[10]  Bo Zhang,et al.  The impact of uncertainty and ambiguity related to iteration and overlapping on schedule of product development projects , 2014 .

[11]  Jonathon N. Cummings Geography is alive and well in virtual teams , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[12]  Li Lin,et al.  Modeling team member characteristics for the formation of a multifunctional team in concurrent engineering , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Structuring Work Distribution for Global Product Development Organizations , 2013 .

[14]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[15]  Bo Zhang,et al.  An Overlapping-Based Design Structure Matrix for Measuring Interaction Strength and Clustering Analysis in Product Development Project , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[16]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Information Technology and Distance-Induced Effort to Manage Offshore Activities , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Paulo J. Gomes,et al.  Linking modularity with problem solving and coordination efforts , 2008 .

[18]  Pamela Abbott,et al.  Why 'nearshore' means that distance matters , 2007, CACM.

[19]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Time Separation, Coordination, and Performance in Technical Teams , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[20]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[21]  Ita Richardson,et al.  Global software development and collaboration: barriers and solutions , 2010, INROADS.

[22]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Following the Sun: Temporal Dispersion and Performance in Open Source Software Project Teams , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Architecture and Communication among Product Development Engineers , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139).

[24]  Daniela E. Damian,et al.  Does Socio-Technical Congruence Have an Effect on Software Build Success? A Study of Coordination in a Software Project , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[25]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .

[26]  Timothy R. Kayworth,et al.  The global virtual manager: a prescription for success , 2000 .

[27]  E. Prater,et al.  A Research Framework for the Impact of Cultural Differences on IT Outsourcing , 2006 .

[28]  Daniela Cruzes,et al.  The impact of global dispersion on coordination, team performance and software quality - A systematic literature review , 2015, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[29]  Aurora Vizcaíno,et al.  Collaboration Tools for Global Software Engineering , 2010, IEEE Software.

[30]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Coordination and Performance in Global Software Service Delivery: The Vendor's Perspective , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[31]  Daniela E. Damian,et al.  Mining Task-Based Social Networks to Explore Collaboration in Software Teams , 2009, IEEE Software.

[32]  Ronnie E. Thebeau Knowledge management of system interfaces and interactions from product development processes , 2001 .

[33]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Crossing Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Globally Distributed Projects: A Relational Model of Coordination Delay , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..