Genetic programs constructed from layered logic gates in single cells

Genetic programs function to integrate environmental sensors, implement signal processing algorithms and control expression dynamics. These programs consist of integrated genetic circuits that individually implement operations ranging from digital logic to dynamic circuits, and they have been used in various cellular engineering applications, including the implementation of process control in metabolic networks and the coordination of spatial differentiation in artificial tissues. A key limitation is that the circuits are based on biochemical interactions occurring in the confined volume of the cell, so the size of programs has been limited to a few circuits. Here we apply part mining and directed evolution to build a set of transcriptional AND gates in Escherichia coli. Each AND gate integrates two promoter inputs and controls one promoter output. This allows the gates to be layered by having the output promoter of an upstream circuit serve as the input promoter for a downstream circuit. Each gate consists of a transcription factor that requires a second chaperone protein to activate the output promoter. Multiple activator–chaperone pairs are identified from type III secretion pathways in different strains of bacteria. Directed evolution is applied to increase the dynamic range and orthogonality of the circuits. These gates are connected in different permutations to form programs, the largest of which is a 4-input AND gate that consists of 3 circuits that integrate 4 inducible systems, thus requiring 11 regulatory proteins. Measuring the performance of individual gates is sufficient to capture the behaviour of the complete program. Errors in the output due to delays (faults), a common problem for layered circuits, are not observed. This work demonstrates the successful layering of orthogonal logic gates, a design strategy that could enable the construction of large, integrated circuits in single cells.

[1]  J. Galán,et al.  Cloning and molecular characterization of genes whose products allow Salmonella typhimurium to penetrate tissue culture cells. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Galán,et al.  Type III Secretion Machines: Bacterial Devices for Protein Delivery into Host Cells , 1999 .

[3]  Roy Want,et al.  Embodied user interfaces for really direct manipulation , 2000, CACM.

[4]  Chris Hanson,et al.  Amorphous computing , 2000, Commun. ACM.

[5]  K. Darwin,et al.  Type III secretion chaperone‐dependent regulation: activation of virulence genes by SicA and InvF in Salmonella typhimurium , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[6]  P. Sansonetti,et al.  Identification of the cis-Acting Site Involved in Activation of Promoters Regulated by Activity of the Type III Secretion Apparatus in Shigella flexneri , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  S. Mangan,et al.  Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S. Basu,et al.  Spatiotemporal control of gene expression with pulse-generating networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Contemporary Logic Design , 2004 .

[10]  T. Marlovits,et al.  Structural Insights into the Assembly of the Type III Secretion Needle Complex , 2004, Science.

[11]  K. A. Walker,et al.  Regulation of the Ysa Type III Secretion System of Yersinia enterocolitica by YsaE/SycB and YsrS/YsrR , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  R. Weiss,et al.  Ultrasensitivity and noise propagation in a synthetic transcriptional cascade. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Environmental signal integration by a modular AND gate , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Modular cell biology: retroactivity and insulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  Adam Arkin,et al.  Setting the standard in synthetic biology , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Induction and relaxation dynamics of the regulatory network controlling the type III secretion system encoded within Salmonella pathogenicity island 1. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  D. Endy,et al.  Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Drew Endy,et al.  Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard , 2009, Journal of biological engineering.

[19]  L. You,et al.  Emergent bistability by a growth-modulating positive feedback circuit. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[20]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[21]  C. Ebel,et al.  Anti-activator ExsD Forms a 1:1 Complex with ExsA to Inhibit Transcription of Type III Secretion Operons* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  Priscilla E. M. Purnick,et al.  The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[23]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Programming cells: towards an automated 'Genetic Compiler'. , 2010, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[24]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  Synthetic biology: applications come of age , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  L. Tsimring,et al.  A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks , 2009, Nature.

[26]  Ruth J. Williams,et al.  Queueing up for Enzymatic Processing: Correlated Signaling through Coupled Degradation , 2022 .

[27]  Baojun Wang,et al.  Engineering modular and orthogonal genetic logic gates for robust digital-like synthetic biology , 2011, Nature communications.

[28]  Adam P Arkin,et al.  Versatile RNA-sensing transcriptional regulators for engineering genetic networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Refactoring the nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Klebsiella oxytoca , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.