Pattern-oriented modeling of bird foraging and pest control in coffee farms

We develop a model of how land use and habitat diversity affect migratory bird populations and their ability to suppress an insect pest on Jamaican coffee farms. Bird foraging—choosing which habitat patch and prey to use as prey abundance changes over space and time—is the key process driving this system. Following the “pattern-oriented” modeling strategy, we identified nine observed patterns that characterize the real system's dynamics. The model was designed so that these patterns could potentially emerge from it. The resulting model is individual-based, has fine spatial and temporal resolutions, represents very simply the supply of the pest insect and other arthropod food in six habitat types, and includes foraging habitat selection as the only adaptive behavior of birds. Although there is an extensive heritage of bird foraging theory in ecology, most of it addresses only the individual level and is too simple for our context. We used pattern-oriented modeling to develop and test foraging theory for this across-scale problem: rules for individual bird foraging that cause the model to reproduce a variety of patterns observed at the system level. Four alternative foraging theories were contrasted by how well they caused the model to reproduce the nine characteristic patterns. Four of these patterns were clearly reproduced with the “null” theory that birds select habitat randomly. A version of classical theory in which birds stay in a patch until food is depleted to some threshold caused the model to reproduce five patterns; this theory caused lower, not higher, use of habitat experiencing an outbreak of prey insects. Assuming that birds select the nearby patch providing highest intake rate caused the model to reproduce all but one pattern, whereas assuming birds select the highest-intake patch over a large radius produced an unrealistic distribution of movement distances. The pattern reproduced under none of the theories, a negative relation between bird density and distance to trees, appears to result from a process not in the model: birds return to trees at night to roost. We conclude that a foraging model for small insectivorous birds in diverse habitat should assume birds can sense higher food supply but over short, not long, distances.

[1]  Madhusudan Katti,et al.  Linking Optimal Foraging Behavior to Bird Community Structure in an Urban‐Desert Landscape: Field Experiments with Artificial Food Patches , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[2]  I. Hardy,et al.  Insect gladiators II: Competitive interactions within and between bethylid parasitoid species of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) , 2005 .

[3]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Ecological and Economic Services Provided by Birds on Jamaican Blue Mountain Coffee Farms , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  Víctor M. Toledo,et al.  Biodiversity Conservation in Traditional Coffee Systems of Mexico , 1999 .

[5]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Roosting behaviour of a migratory songbird on Jamaican coffee farms: landscape composition may affect delivery of an ecosystem service , 2011, Bird Conservation International.

[6]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Effects of food availability on the distribution of migratory warblers among habitats in Jamaica , 2001 .

[7]  J. Emlen The Role of Time and Energy in Food Preference , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[8]  D. Levey,et al.  Digestive Responses of Temperate Birds Switched to Fruit or Insect Diets , 1989 .

[9]  C. Borgemeister,et al.  Biological control of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by Phymastichus coffea (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) in Colombia. , 2005, Bulletin of entomological research.

[10]  M. Kinnaird,et al.  Caffeine and Conservation , 2003, Science.

[11]  W. Tamis,et al.  Abundance of invertebrate prey for birds on organic and conventional arable farms in the Netherlands , 2011 .

[12]  Uta Berger,et al.  Pattern-Oriented Modeling of Agent-Based Complex Systems: Lessons from Ecology , 2005, Science.

[13]  A. Oaten,et al.  Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[14]  Damaris Zurell,et al.  The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers , 2010 .

[15]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[16]  Andrew D. West,et al.  Predicting mortality in novel environments: tests and sensitivity of a behaviour‐based model , 2000 .

[17]  J. Bullock,et al.  The effect of habitat complexity on the functional response of a seed‐eating passerine , 2009 .

[18]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[19]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Tests of Theory for Diel Variation in Salmonid Feeding Activity and Habitat Use , 2005 .

[20]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Individual-based modeling and ecology , 2005 .

[21]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Pest reduction services by birds in shade and sun coffee in Jamaica , 2010 .

[22]  P. Marra,et al.  Tropical winter habitat limits reproductive success on the temperate breeding grounds in a migratory bird , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Graham H. Pyke,et al.  Optimal Foraging: A Selective Review of Theory and Tests , 1977, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[24]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  The ODD protocol: A review and first update , 2010, Ecological Modelling.

[25]  Matthew D. Johnson Effects of Shade‐Tree Species and Crop Structure on the Winter Arthropod and Bird Communities in a Jamaican Shade Coffee Plantation 1 , 2000 .

[26]  R. Holmes,et al.  MASS LOSS BY BREEDING FEMALE SONGBIRDS: FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION SUPPORTS ENERGETIC STRESS HYPOTHESIS IN BLACK-THROATED BLUE WARBLERS , 2007 .

[27]  Birgit Müller,et al.  A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models , 2006 .

[28]  R. Stillman,et al.  Individual‐based ecology of coastal birds , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[29]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Bayesian birds: A simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging , 1980 .

[30]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  ANALYSIS OF HABITAT‐SELECTION RULES USING ANINDIVIDUAL‐BASED MODEL , 2002 .

[31]  R. Holmes,et al.  Comparative Population Bioenergetics of Three Insectivorous Passerines in a Deciduous Forest , 1979 .

[32]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction , 2011 .

[33]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Assessing Habitat Quality for a Migratory Songbird Wintering in Natural and Agricultural Habitats , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[34]  Tatsuya Amano,et al.  DECISION-MAKING IN GROUP FORAGERS WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION: TEST OF INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL IN GEESE , 2006 .

[35]  Richard A. Stillman,et al.  Predicting the functional response of a farmland bird , 2006 .

[36]  J. Krebs,et al.  Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging: A study of patch use by chickadees , 1974 .

[37]  S. Bearhop,et al.  Stable isotope ratios indicate that body condition in migrating passerines is influenced by winter habitat , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  A. Damon,et al.  A review of the biology and control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). , 2000, Bulletin of entomological research.

[39]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Movement rules for individual-based models of stream fish , 1999 .

[40]  M. Whittingham,et al.  The influence of substrate on the functional response of an avian granivore and its implications for farmland bird conservation , 2002, Oecologia.