Using brain-based measures to compose teams: How individual capabilities and team collaboration strategies jointly shape performance

Abstract Advances in understanding neural processes open the possibility of using brain-based measures to compose collaborative work teams. Neuroimaging studies have shown that individual differences in patterns of brain activity can predict differences in performance of specific tasks. We extended this finding by examining performance not simply by a single brain, but by pairs of brains. We used measures derived from brain-based studies to compose 100 two-person teams in which members’ roles were either congruent or incongruent with their individual abilities. The assessed abilities are rooted in the visual system, which comprises independent “spatial” and “object” subsystems. The team task required one member to navigate through a virtual maze (a spatial task) and the other to remember “tag” repetitions of complex “greebles” (an object-properties task). Teams in which members’ role assignments were congruent with their abilities performed better than incongruent teams and teams in which both members scored high on only one of the abilities. In addition, verbal collaboration enabled members of incongruent teams to overcome their compositional disadvantage but did not enhance the performance of congruent teams—and actually impaired performance in teams in which both members were adept in only one of the two necessary abilities. The findings show that knowledge about brain systems can not only be used to compose teams, but also provides insights into how teams can best perform.

[1]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise , 1997 .

[2]  Glen Lean,et al.  Spatial ability, visual imagery, and mathematical performance , 1981 .

[3]  Stephen H. Wagner,et al.  The Relationship between Work-Team Personality Composition and the Job Performance of Teams , 1999 .

[4]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Brain rCBF and performance in visual imagery tasks: Common and distinct processes , 2004 .

[5]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Why team cognition? An overview. , 2004 .

[6]  J. Myerson,et al.  Behavioral evidence for brain-based ability factors in visuospatial information processing , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Aaron M. Brower,et al.  What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .

[8]  D. Eden,et al.  Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts? , 1985 .

[9]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  Effects of Perceived Skill Dissimilarity and Task Interdependence on Helping in Work Teams , 2005 .

[10]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[11]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[12]  S. Platek,et al.  Evolutionary Cognitive Neuroscience , 2006 .

[13]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Influence of Working-Memory Demand and Subject Performance on Prefrontal Cortical Activity , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Daniel Y. Kimberg,et al.  Neural correlates of cognitive efficiency , 2006, NeuroImage.

[16]  J. Lepine.  Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[18]  R. Cattell.  Concepts and methods in the measurement of group syntality. , 1948, Psychological review.

[19]  I. Altman,et al.  The Effects of Social Isolation and Group Composition on Performance , 1967 .

[20]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[21]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[22]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[23]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[24]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances , 2002 .

[25]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[26]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[27]  David E. J. Linden,et al.  Separation of the Systems for Color and Spatial Manipulation in Working Memory Revealed by a Dual-task Procedure , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[30]  Mukesh Dhamala,et al.  Hyperscanning : Simultaneous fMRI during Linked Social Interactions , 2001 .

[31]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Individual Differences in Cerebral Blood Flow in Area 17 Predict the Time to Evaluate Visualized Letters , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Fisher.  014: On the "Probable Error" of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced from a Small Sample. , 1921 .

[33]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[34]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[35]  S. Kosslyn.  Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Jennifer M. Shephard,et al.  Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Jonathon N. Cummings.  Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Linda Argote,et al.  Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. , 1996 .

[39]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[40]  Thomas E. Jerde,et al.  Spatial and Object Visualization Cognitive Styles : Validation Studies in 3800 Individuals , 2006 .

[41]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Revising the Visualizer-Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers , 2002 .

[42]  Michael A. Motes,et al.  Object-Spatial Imagery: A New Self-Report Imagery Questionnaire , 2006 .

[43]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object and spatial visual working memory activate separate neural systems in human cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  M D'Esposito,et al.  The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory: effects of memory load and individual differences. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[46]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness , 1976 .