Crossing boundaries: Interdisciplinarity in the context of urban environments

Drawing upon the discussions and insights provided by researchers and policy-makers during a seminar series, this paper explores the rationales for, and the practices and difficulties of, interdisciplinarity. The urban environment provides the problem context. Despite a consistent rhetoric and repeated attempts to promote interdisciplinary research, not least by the funding councils in response to policy imperatives, success appears to have been limited. The paper suggests that rather than viewing interdisciplinarity as a distinct, often difficult, category of research it is more useful to consider a continuum of research types from multi- to transdisciplinarity. The paper furthers the interdisciplinarity debate by characterising five categories of ‘border troubles’. These involve the relentless association of interdisciplinarity with ‘real world problems’, the epistemological structuring of disciplines, assumptions about the disciplinary division of labour and the privileging of certain frames and forms of enquiry, the increasing complexity of knowledge transfer, and the ‘hard wiring’ of the research funding and assessment system. However, we conclude optimistically in terms of the evident willingness of researchers to occupy hazardous disciplinary border zones to further urban environmental understanding and propose a set of ‘conditions for success’ encompassing both the approach and practices of participants in interdisciplinary work as well as operational and contextual factors.

[1]  C. P. Snow,et al.  The Two Cultures: And a Second Look , 1965 .

[2]  Judith Petts,et al.  Barriers to Deliberative Participation in EIA: Learning from Waste Policies, Plans and Projects , 2003 .

[3]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[4]  Mark Whitehead,et al.  (Re)Analysing the Sustainable City: Nature, Urbanisation and the Regulation of Socio-environmental Relations in the UK , 2003 .

[5]  J. Sime,et al.  Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity , 2004 .

[6]  John Forrester,et al.  Participatory Modelling and the Local Governance of the Politics of UK Air Pollution: A Three-City Case Study , 2003, Environmental Values.

[7]  Carole Després,et al.  Futures of Transdisciplinarity , 2004 .

[8]  Keith Richards,et al.  Geography in the United Kingdom 1992-1996 , 1996 .

[9]  Thierry Ramadier,et al.  Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies , 2004 .

[10]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Concepts of risk : a classification , 1992 .

[11]  J. Petts,et al.  Expert Conceptualisations of the Role of Lay Knowledge in Environmental Decisionmaking: challenges for Deliberative Democracy , 2006 .

[12]  Simon Shackley,et al.  Reconceiving Science and Policy: Academic, Fiducial and Bureaucratic Knowledge , 1999 .

[13]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  Publish and Perish? , 2002 .

[14]  Brendan Gleeson,et al.  Consuming Cities: the urban environment in the global economy after the Rio declaration , 2000 .

[15]  Jonathan D. Sime Designing for people or ball-bearings? , 1985 .

[16]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[17]  Erica Schoenberger,et al.  Interdisciplinarity and social power , 2001 .

[18]  P. Hall,et al.  Urban Future 21: A Global Agenda for Twenty-First Century Cities , 2000 .

[19]  Robin Williams,et al.  Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: the case of the Fifth Framework programme , 2004 .

[20]  J. Ravetz Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems , 2020 .

[21]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Bridging the Two Cultures of Risk Analysis1,2 , 1993 .

[22]  P. Degeling THE SIGNIFICANCE OF 'SECTORS' IN CALLS FOR URBAN PUBLIC HEALTH INTERSECTORALISM: an Australian perspective , 1995 .

[23]  G. Petts,et al.  Restructuring physical geography , 2002 .

[24]  S. Owens ‘Engaging the Public’: Information and Deliberation in Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[25]  Simon Marvin,et al.  Disciplining the sustainable city: Moving beyond science, technology or society? , 2004 .

[26]  S. Krimsky,et al.  Social Theories of Risk , 1992 .

[27]  M. Betsill,et al.  Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the 'Urban' Politics of Climate Change , 2005 .

[28]  N. Thrift,et al.  Geography in the United Kingdom 1996–2000 , 2000 .

[29]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[30]  G. Myers Centering: Proposals for an Interdisciplinary Research Center , 1993 .