The Comprehension Strategies of Second Language Readers

Think-aloud protocols, a version of verbal report in which participants state their thoughts and behaviors, have become increasingly popular as a means of studying the comprehension processes of native English speakers. The study reported in this article used think-alouds to examine the comprehension strategies used by college-level students-both native speakers of English and nonnative speakers--enrolled in remedial reading classes as they read material from a college textbook. "Poor" readers (those who had failed the college's reading proficiency test) were chosen for study because they are the ones at whom college remedial reading programs are aimed. Furthermore, their use of comprehension strategies has not attained the degree of automaticity found in fluent readers. Thus, they may be more aware of how they solve the problems they encounter as they read. Some of the strategies used by the ESL and native-speaking readers in the study are described. Strategy use is related to measures of memory and comprehension and to academic performance, and implications for teaching are discussed. The thoughts that wander or rush through the minds of readers, the searches and struggles for meaning, the reflections and associations, are hidden from the outside observer. Yet this struggle and search for control are the core of reading comprehension. For teachers, knowledge of the components and management of this internal process is extremely important. Without it, educators must resort to designing reading programs based on intuitions and guesses about students' problems. Without it, classroom teachers are left commiserating with Eskey (1973), who described the "maddening experience of having a student who appears to understand every sentence and yet cannot answer the simplest question about a passage as a whole" (p. 177). Knowledge about the process, not just the product of reading, is needed if we are to move

[1]  J. Cummins The Cross-Lingual Dimensions of Language Proficiency: Implications for Bilingual Education and the Optimal Age Issue. , 1980 .

[2]  Robert L. Schreiner,et al.  The reading processes of above average and average readers: a comparison of the use of reasoning strategies in responding to standardized comprehension measures , 1979 .

[3]  Sandra L. Stotsky Research on Reading/Writing Relationships: A Synthesis and Suggested Directions , 1983, Language Arts.

[4]  W. Lambert,et al.  Bilingual education of children;: The St. Lambert experiment , 1972 .

[5]  David E. Eskey A MODEL PROGRAM FOR TEACHING ADVANCED READING TO STUDENTS OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE , 1973 .

[6]  Gary A. Cziko LANGUAGE COMPETENCE AND READING STRATEGIES: A COMPARISON OF FIRST‐AND SECOND‐LANGUAGE ORAL READING ERRORS1 , 1980 .

[7]  John W. Oller,et al.  CLOZE TESTS IN ENGLISH, THAI, AND VIETNAMESE: NATIVE AND NON‐NATIVE PERFORMANCE , 1972 .

[8]  Victoria Chou Hare Readers' Problem Identification and Problem Solving Strategies for High-and Low-Knowledge Articles , 1981 .

[9]  Emerald V. Dechant Diagnosis and remediation of reading disability , 1981 .

[10]  Linda B. Gambrell,et al.  Adult Disabled Readers' Metacognitive Awareness about Reading Tasks and Strategies , 1981 .

[11]  L. Baker,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring: Identifying and Coping with Text Confusions1 , 1979 .

[12]  Peter P. Afflerbach,et al.  On the Use of Verbal Reports in Reading Research , 1984 .

[13]  A. Fareed Interpretive Responses in Reading History and Biology: An Exploratory Study. , 1971 .

[14]  Ann Raimes,et al.  WHAT UNSKILLED ESL STUDENTS DO AS THEY WRITE: A CLASSROOM STUDY OF COMPOSING , 1985 .

[15]  Vivian Zamel The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies , 1983 .

[16]  Kenneth S. Goodman,et al.  Psycholinguistic Universals in the Reading Process. , 1970 .

[17]  Robert J. Tierney,et al.  Toward a Composing Model of Reading. , 1983 .

[18]  Vivian Zamel,et al.  Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning , 1982 .

[19]  Thom Hudson,et al.  The effects of induced schemata on the "short circuit" in L2 reading: Non‐decoding factors in L2 reading performance. , 1982 .

[20]  James R. Squire Composing and Comprehending: Two Sides of the Same Basic Process. , 1983 .

[21]  R. Strang,et al.  How Do Students Read a Short Story , 1965 .

[22]  K. Stanovich TOWARD AN INTERACTIVE-COMPENSATORY MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF READING FLUENCY , 1980 .

[23]  K. Goodman,et al.  Reading and Writing Relationships: Pragmatic Functions. , 1983 .

[24]  G. Kleiman Comparing Good and Poor Readers: A Critique of the Research. Technical Report. No. 246. , 1982 .

[25]  Ellen L. Block The comprehension strategies of nonproficient native and non-native readers of English : a descriptive study of process in progress , 1985 .

[26]  Ruth Garner,et al.  Monitoring of Understanding: An Investigation of Good and Poor Readers' Awareness of Induced Miscomprehension of Text , 1980 .

[27]  Jill Edwards Olshavsky,et al.  Reading as Problem Solving: An Investigation of Strategies. , 1976 .

[28]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[29]  Carol Hosenfeld,et al.  A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners , 1977 .

[30]  Richard A. Kasschau The psychology of being human. 2nd ed. , 1977 .

[31]  Helen K. Smith The Responses of Good and Poor Readers When Asked to Read for Different Purposes , 1967 .

[32]  J. Piekarz Getting Meaning from Reading , 1956, The Elementary School Journal.

[33]  J. Emig The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders , 1971 .

[34]  J. Macnamara Comparative Studies of Reading and Problem Solving in Two Languages. , 1970 .

[35]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  SOME USES OF MENTALISTIC DATA IN SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH1 , 1981 .

[36]  Peter Johnston,et al.  Comprehension Monitoring and the Error Detection Paradigm , 1982 .

[37]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. Technical Report No. 306. , 1988 .

[38]  M. Clarke READING IN SPANISH AND ENGLISH: EVIDENCE FROM ADULT ESL STUDENTS , 1979 .