Optimum ratio of distraction in double level tibial lengthening.

The authors reviewed 43 double level tibial lengthenings by Ilizarov technique in 34 consecutive patients (6-31 years old), and investigated the factors affecting regenerate bone healing to determine the optimum ratio of distraction rate or magnitude of lengthening at the proximal and distal osteotomy sites. Length gain averaged 6.1 cm (range, 2.5-12.3 cm), equivalent to a 28% increase of the segment. The variables investigated included age, gender, concomitant deformity correction, etiology, and the amount of length gain. The healing index averaged 1.8 months per centimeter proximally and 2.8 months per centimeter distally. Age and the amount of length gain affected the healing index at proximal and distal lengthening sites. However, the proximal to distal healing index ratio, which averaged 0.72, was not affected by any parameters investigated. This study suggests that to minimize external fixation treatment time, the distraction rate, or amount of length gain, of the distal osteotomy site should be approximately 3/4 that of the proximal site in the double level tibial lengthening.

[1]  D. Stanitski,et al.  The effect of femoral lengthening on knee articular cartilage: the role of apparatus extension across the joint. , 1996, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[2]  P. Armstrong,et al.  Results of tibial lengthening with the Ilizarov technique. , 1996, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[3]  J Aronson,et al.  Temporal and spatial increases in blood flow during distraction osteogenesis. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  C. Chung,et al.  Changes of Blood Flow of the Femoral Head After Subtrochanteric Osteotomy in Legg‐Perthes' Disease: A Serial Scintigraphic Study , 1992, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[5]  N. Yasui,et al.  The effect of distraction upon bone, muscle, and periosteum. , 1991, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[6]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  Clinical application of the tension-stress effect for limb lengthening. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  D. Paley,et al.  Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  G A Ilizarov,et al.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Roberto Aldegheri,et al.  Limb Lengthening by Callus Distraction (Callotasis) , 1987, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.