Critical Assessment of Technological Development: What Can Bibliometrics Reveal?

Scientific discoveries and innovations have served as the backbone for technological advancements, which can impart societal benefits and address critical needs in areas such as public health. For example, the modern hip implant has proven to be an effective treatment for joint-related diseases like arthritis. In the procedure, artificial joints are used to replace damaged or worn joints which can restore mobility and relieve concomitant pains. Today, many materials and implant parameters such as geometry, shape, and angle are available to surgeons, which can support a positive treatment outcome. Considering the significance, it is of interest to retroactively reflect on the technological evolutionary pathways. Technological assessment is not new, but evaluating the process is necessary for optimizing best-case outcomes. Technological developments follow the cycle of of need and solution, leading to both radical and incremental advancements. In this work, we examine the research patterns and contributions that have shaped the technical discourse, using a commonplace hip implant material as an illustrative study from the scholarly perspective. In the span of 5 decades, output for polyethylene-related works grew from 2 in the late 1970s, to 2,123 publications in the 2010s, totaling over 4,600 publications with contributions from surgeons, biologists, engineers, physicists, and chemists. We disentangle components within the ecosystem and discuss the validity of insights from a bibliometric perspective. The reconciliation of technological developments to the impact is dependent on the aims of the assessment. Whilst it is found that bibliometrics analysis could help to disambiguate the technological innovations involving materials systems, advanced computer modeling, and detailed clinical trials, there are socioeconomic aspects, such as health systems, that are not easily validated. To maintain a greater degree of neutrality, the assessment of both public and private will benefit the interpretation of a multi-level system.

[1]  Y. Ho,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics , 2019, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[2]  Veronika Pilz,et al.  Projections of primary hip arthroplasty in Germany until 2040 , 2018, Acta orthopaedica.

[3]  M. Coccia Driving Forces of Technological Change in Medicine: Radical Innovations Induced by Side Effects and Their Impact on Society and Healthcare , 2012 .

[4]  G. Arora,et al.  Effects of Osteoarthritis on Quality of life in Elderly Population of Bhubaneswar, India , 2015, Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation.

[5]  Wenchao Zhang,et al.  The top 100 most cited articles on total hip arthroplasty: a bibliometric analysis , 2019, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[6]  Hung-Wen Wei,et al.  Incidence of hip replacement among national health insurance enrollees in Taiwan , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[7]  A. Rietveld,et al.  Total hip replacement in dancers , 2013, Clinical Rheumatology.

[8]  P. Devos,et al.  Publication output of French orthopedic and trauma surgeons: Quantitative and qualitative bibliometric analysis of their scientific production in orthopedics and other medical fields. , 2019, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[9]  F. Narin,et al.  Bibliometrics/Theory, Practice and Problems , 1994 .

[10]  N. Heckmann,et al.  Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Trends in the United States From 2007 to 2014: The Rise of Ceramic on Polyethylene. , 2018, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  A. Geissler,et al.  Utilization rates of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries. , 2014, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[12]  M. Gordon,et al.  Projections of total hip replacement in Sweden from 2013 to 2030 , 2014, Acta orthopaedica.

[13]  M. Beck,et al.  The Hundred Most Cited Publications in Orthopaedic HIP Research - A Bibliometric Analysis , 2016, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[14]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: the effect of poorly cited journals in oncology , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[15]  E. Malacova,et al.  A decade of Australian and New Zealand orthopaedic publications: a bibliometric trend analysis from 2008 to 2018 , 2019, International Orthopaedics.

[16]  L. Beckert,et al.  Pseudotumours and IgG4-related disease: a case report. , 2014, The New Zealand medical journal.

[17]  P. Choudhari,et al.  Trends in scientific publications of Indian arthroplasty surgeons over 15 years (2001–2015) , 2017 .

[18]  T. Cheng,et al.  Research in orthopaedics from China has thrived over the last decade: a bibliometric analysis of publication activity. , 2012, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[19]  T. K. Kim,et al.  Bibliometric Analysis of Orthopedic Literature on Total Knee Arthroplasty in Asian Countries: A 10-year Analysis , 2015, Knee surgery & related research.

[20]  A. Geissler,et al.  Projections of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries up to 2050 , 2018, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[21]  S. Affatato,et al.  Materials for Hip Prostheses: A Review of Wear and Loading Considerations , 2019, Materials.

[22]  C. Cooper,et al.  Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. , 2015, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[23]  E. Jang,et al.  Epidemiology of Hip Replacements in Korea from 2007 to 2011 , 2014, Journal of Korean medical science.

[24]  Julia Melkers,et al.  Bibliometrics as a Tool for Analysis of R&D Impacts , 1993 .

[25]  Thomas M. Krummel,et al.  Innovation in Surgery: A Historical Perspective , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[26]  Y. Akman,et al.  Worldwide arthroplasty research productivity and contribution of Turkey , 2018, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[27]  M. Meyer Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[28]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  Kun-zheng Wang,et al.  Joint replacement in China: progress and challenges. , 2012, Rheumatology.

[30]  T. Joyce,et al.  Precaution, governance and the failure of medical implants: the ASR(TM) hip in the UK , 2014, Life sciences, society and policy.

[31]  Konstantinos N Malizos,et al.  Quality of life and psychological consequences in elderly patients after a hip fracture: a review , 2018, Clinical interventions in aging.

[32]  R. Malhotra,et al.  Anthropometric measurements to design best-fit femoral stem for the Indian population , 2012, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[33]  Atul Kumar,et al.  Temporal trends in primary and revision total knee and hip replacement in Taiwan , 2015, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.