Effect of Once‐Weekly Exenatide on Clinical Outcomes According to Baseline Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Insights From the EXSCEL Trial

Background In the EXSCEL (Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering), exenatide once‐weekly resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and a nominal 14% reduction in all‐cause mortality in 14 752 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with and without cardiovascular disease. Whether patients at increased risk for events experienced a comparatively greater treatment benefit with exenatide is unknown. Methods and Results In the EXSCEL population, we created risk scores for MACEs and all‐cause mortality using step‐wise selection of baseline characteristics. A risk score was calculated for each patient, and a time‐to‐event model for each end point was developed including the risk score, treatment assignment, and risk‐treatment interaction. Interaction P values evaluating for a differential treatment effect by baseline risk were reported. Over a median follow‐up of 3.2 years (interquartile range, 2.2, 4.4), 1091 (7.4%) patients died and 1744 (11.8%) experienced a MACE. Independent predictors of MACEs and all‐cause mortality included age, sex, comorbidities (eg, previous cardiovascular event), body mass index, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The all‐cause mortality and MACE risk models had modest discrimination with optimism‐corrected c‐indices of 0.73 and 0.71, respectively. No interaction was observed between treatment effect and risk profile for either end point (both interactions, P>0.1). Conclusions Baseline characteristics (eg, age, previous cardiovascular events) and routine laboratory values (eg, hemoglobin A1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate) provided modest prognostic value for mortality and MACEs in a broad population of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exenatide's effects on mortality and MACEs were consistent across the spectrum of baseline risk. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01144338.

[1]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. , 2017, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[2]  Neha J. Pagidipati,et al.  Effects of Once‐Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Neha J. Pagidipati,et al.  Baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) , 2017, American heart journal.

[4]  D. Drucker The Cardiovascular Biology of Glucagon-like Peptide-1. , 2016, Cell metabolism.

[5]  M. Pencina,et al.  Rationale and design of the EXenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial. , 2016, American heart journal.

[6]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  Outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use in patients with comorbidities: results from a combined analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials. , 2014, JACC. Heart failure.

[7]  M. Copetti,et al.  Development and Validation of a Predicting Model of All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[8]  R. R. Holman,et al.  UKPDS Outcomes Model 2: a new version of a model to simulate lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using data from the 30 year United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study: UKPDS 82 , 2013, Diabetologia.

[9]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  The PROTECT in‐hospital risk model: 7‐day outcome in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure and renal dysfunction , 2012, European journal of heart failure.

[10]  Carol M. Mangione,et al.  Predictors of Mortality Over 8 Years in Type 2 Diabetic Patients , 2012, Diabetes Care.

[11]  Anil Jain,et al.  Predicting 6-Year Mortality Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[12]  Xilin Yang,et al.  Development and validation of an all-cause mortality risk score in type 2 diabetes. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  T. Vos,et al.  Are beta-blockers as efficacious in patients with diabetes mellitus as in patients without diabetes mellitus who have chronic heart failure? A meta-analysis of large-scale clinical trials. , 2003, American heart journal.

[14]  Daniel B. Mark,et al.  TUTORIAL IN BIOSTATISTICS MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORS , 1996 .