Evaluating the sustainable mining contractor selection problems: An imprecise last aggregation preference selection index method

Abstract The increasing complexity surrounding decision-making situations has made it inevitable for practitioners to apply ideas from a group of experts or decision makers (DMs) instead of individuals. In a large proportion of recent studies, not enough attention has been paid to considering uncertainty in practical ways. In this paper, a hesitant fuzzy preference selection index (HFPSI) method is proposed based on a new soft computing approach with risk preferences of DMs to deal with imprecise multi-criteria decision-making problems. Meanwhile, qualitative assessing criteria are considered in the process of the proposed method to help the DMs by providing suitable expressions of membership degrees for an element under a set. Moreover, the best alternative is selected based on considering the concepts of preference relation and hesitant fuzzy sets, simultaneously. Therefore, DMs' weights are determined according to the proposed hesitant fuzzy compromise solution technique to prevent judgment errors. Moreover, the proposed method has been extended based on the last aggregation method by aggregating the DMs' opinions during the last stage to avoid data loss. In this respect, a real case study about the mining contractor selection problem is provided to represent the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed HFPSI method in practice. Then, a comparative analysis is performed to show the feasibility of the presented approach. Finally, sensitivity analysis is carried out to show the effect of considering the DMs' weights and last aggregation approach in a dispersion of the alternatives’ ranking values.

[1]  Keun-Young Lee,et al.  Sustainable Development in the Mining Sector and Its Evaluation Using Fuzzy AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) Approach , 2011 .

[2]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[3]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority , 1992 .

[4]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A new incomplete preference relations based approach to quality function deployment , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A Mobile Decision Support System for Dynamic Group Decision-Making Problems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[6]  G. Wei,et al.  Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set , 2013 .

[7]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[8]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations under uncertain environments , 2010, Inf. Fusion.

[9]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[10]  Vicenç Torra,et al.  On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[11]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management , 2006 .

[12]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Ranking the strategies of mining sector through anp and topsis in a swot framework , 2011 .

[13]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  A Consensus Support System Model for Group Decision-Making Problems With Multigranular Linguistic Preference Relations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[14]  E. S. Gonzalez,et al.  Decision-support models for sustainable mining networks: fundamentals and challenges , 2016 .

[15]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[16]  H. Gitinavard,et al.  Solving robot selection problem by a new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-attributes group decision method , 2016 .

[17]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  A novel two-phase group decision making approach for construction project selection in a fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[18]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consistency‐based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values , 2008, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[19]  Chao Wang,et al.  Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[20]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[21]  Chia-Ling Chang,et al.  A modified VIKOR method for multiple criteria analysis , 2010, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[22]  M. Fedrizzi,et al.  Fuzzy Logic Approaches to Consensus Modelling in Group Decision Making , 2008 .

[23]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Soft computing based on a fuzzy grey group compromise solution approach with an application to the selection problem of material handling equipment , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[24]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[25]  Abbas Mahmoudabadi,et al.  Sub-Contractor Selection in General Contractor Organizations Using Interval-Valued Fuzzy , 2012 .

[26]  R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Robot selection by a multiple criteria complex proportional assessment method under an interval-valued fuzzy environment , 2014 .

[27]  Sławomir Biruk,et al.  Assessing contractor selection criteria weights with fuzzy AHP method application in group decision environment , 2010 .

[28]  K. Maniya,et al.  A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method , 2010 .

[29]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Interval multiplicative transitivity for consistency, missing values and priority weights of interval fuzzy preference relations , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[30]  Ehsan Pourjavad,et al.  Selecting maintenance strategy in mining industry by analytic network process and TOPSIS , 2013 .

[31]  Kamalakanta Muduli,et al.  Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP approach , 2015 .

[32]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[33]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Multiple-Attribute Group Decision Making With Different Formats of Preference Information on Attributes , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[34]  Sandeep Grover,et al.  Application of preference selection index method for decision making over the design stage of production system life cycle , 2015 .

[35]  Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS method , 2011 .

[36]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A New Optimization Model for Project Portfolio Selection Under Interval-Valued Fuzzy Environment , 2015 .

[37]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Green supply chain practices evaluation in the mining industry using a joint rough sets and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology , 2015 .

[39]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[40]  Mohammad Ataei,et al.  Suitable mining method for Golbini No. 8 deposit in Jajarm (Iran) using TOPSIS method , 2008 .

[41]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni means , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[42]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[43]  N. Foroozesh,et al.  Hierarchical Group Compromise Ranking Methodology Based on Euclidean–Hausdorff Distance Measure Under Uncertainty: An Application to Facility Location Selection Problem , 2019 .

[44]  Devika Kannan,et al.  Green vendor evaluation and selection using AHP and Taguchi loss functions in production outsourcing in mining industry , 2015 .

[45]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 2013, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.

[46]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  An Adaptive Consensus Support Model for Group Decision-Making Problems in a Multigranular Fuzzy Linguistic Context , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[47]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[48]  R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam,et al.  Dispatching Rule Evaluation in Flexible Manufacturing Systems by a New Fuzzy Decision Model with Possibilistic-Statistical Uncertainties , 2017 .

[49]  Z. S. Xu,et al.  Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation , 2004, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[50]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[51]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[52]  B. Vahdani,et al.  A NEW INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MODEL TO GROUP DECISION MAKING FOR THE SELECTION OF OUTSOURCING PROVIDERS , 2015 .

[53]  Mohammad Javad Rahimdel,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method to primary crusher selection for Golegohar Iron Mine (Iran) , 2014 .

[54]  Mousumi Modak,et al.  Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and Fuzzy AHP approach: A case of the Indian coal mining organization , 2017 .