Human Papillomavirus Load Measured by Linear Array Correlates with Quantitative PCR in Cervical Cytology Specimens

ABSTRACT Carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are necessary causes of most anogenital cancers. Viral load has been proposed as a marker for progression to cancer precursors but has been confirmed only for HPV16. Challenges in studying viral load are related to the lack of validated assays for a large number of genotypes. We compared viral load measured by Linear Array (LA) HPV genotyping with the gold standard, quantitative PCR (Q-PCR). LA genotyping and Q-PCR were performed in 143 cytology specimens from women referred to colposcopy. LA signal strength was measured by densitometry. Correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to evaluate analytical and clinical performance. We observed a moderate to strong correlation between the two quantitative viral load measurements, ranging from an R value of 0.61 for HPV31 to an R value of 0.86 for HPV52. We also observed agreement between visual LA signal strength evaluation and Q-PCR. Both quantifications agreed on the disease stages with highest viral load, which varied by type (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 [CIN2] for HPV52, CIN3 for HPV16 and HPV33, and cancer for HPV18 and HPV31). The area under the curve (AUC) for HPV16 Q-PCR at the CIN3 cutoff was 0.72 (P = 0.004), and the AUC for HPV18 LA at the CIN2 cutoff was 0.78 (P = 0.04). Quantification of LA signals correlates with the current gold standard for viral load, Q-PCR. Analyses of viral load need to address multiple infections and type attribution to evaluate whether viral load has clinical value beyond the established HPV16 finding. Our findings support conducting comprehensive studies of viral load and cervical cancer precursors using quantitative LA genotyping data.

[1]  N. Kiviat,et al.  Viral load in the natural history of human papillomavirus type 16 infection: a nested case-control study. , 2011, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[2]  D. Celentano,et al.  Kinetics of DNA load predict HPV 16 viral clearance. , 2011, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[3]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Multiple human papillomavirus genotype infections in cervical cancer progression in the study to understand cervical cancer early endpoints and determinants , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[5]  N. Hens,et al.  Human Papillomavirus 16 Load and E2/E6 Ratio in HPV16-Positive Women: Biomarkers for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia ≥2 in a Liquid-Based Cytology Setting? , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[6]  D. Celentano,et al.  Confirmation and quantitation of human papillomavirus type 52 by Roche Linear Array using HPV52-specific TaqMan E6/E7 quantitative real-time PCR. , 2009, Journal of virological methods.

[7]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Human Papillomavirus Cofactors by Disease Progression and Human Papillomavirus Types in the Study to Understand Cervical Cancer Early Endpoints and Determinants , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[8]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Evaluation of Linear Array Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Using Automatic Optical Imaging Software , 2008, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  S. Wacholder,et al.  High load for most high risk human papillomavirus genotypes is associated with prevalent cervical cancer precursors but only HPV16 load predicts the development of incident disease , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[10]  M. Sherman,et al.  Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotyping Using Paired Exfoliated Cervicovaginal Cells and Paraffin-Embedded Tissues To Highlight Difficulties in Attributing HPV Types to Specific Lesions , 2007, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[11]  J. Doorbar,et al.  Papillomavirus Life Cycle Organization and Biomarker Selection , 2007, Disease markers.

[12]  S. Wacholder,et al.  Relationships of human papillomavirus type, qualitative viral load, and age with cytologic abnormality. , 2006, Cancer research.

[13]  N. Lalaoui,et al.  Dynamics of HPV16 DNA load reflect the natural history of cervical HPV-associated lesions. , 2006, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[14]  J. Fontaine,et al.  High Level of Correlation of Human Papillomavirus-16 DNA Viral Load Estimates Generated by Three Real-time PCR Assays Applied on Genital Specimens , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[15]  V. Dalstein,et al.  High risk HPV load estimated by Hybrid Capture II correlates with HPV16 load measured by real-time PCR in cervical smears of HPV16-infected women. , 2004, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[16]  C. Wheeler,et al.  Determinants of human papillomavirus load among women with histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: dominant impact of surrounding low-grade lesions. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[17]  C. Peyton,et al.  Reproducibility of HPV 16 and HPV 18 viral load quantitation using TaqMan real-time PCR assays. , 2003, Journal of virological methods.

[18]  David R. Scott,et al.  Viral load of human papillomavirus and risk of CIN3 or cervical cancer , 2002, The Lancet.