(How) Can we value health, safety and the environment?

Abstract The assumptions that underpin the conventional economic model of ‘rational agents’ tend to be substantially violated by data from surveys that try to elicit people’s values for health, safety and environmental goods. Psychological research suggests that there may be a large affective component in people’s responses to such surveys, with the result that those data are not amenable to the ‘logic’ of economic rationality. This raises questions both about the way we model human judgment and decision processes, and also about the use of survey data to guide public policy in these and other areas.

[1]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Determinants of insensitivity to quantity in valuation of public goods: Contribution, warm glow, budget constraints, availability, and prominence , 1996 .

[2]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  On the Contingent Valuation of Safety and the Safety of Contingent Valuation: Part 1-Caveat Investigator , 1998 .

[3]  Robert Sugden,et al.  The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty Without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences , 2004 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Rational choice and the framing of decisions , 1990 .

[5]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Coping with Preference Anomalies in Cost–Benefit Analysis: A Market-Simulation Approach , 2005 .

[6]  Christopher K. Hsee.  Attribute Evaluability and its Implications for Joint-Separate Evaluation Reversals and Beyond , 2006 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[8]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena. , 1987 .

[9]  D. Kahneman.  Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[10]  G. Loomes,et al.  Imprecise Preferences and Survey Design in Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[11]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology , 1999 .

[12]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Evaluation by Moments: Past and Future , 2002 .

[13]  Daniel Kahneman.  New challenges to the rationality assumption , 1994 .

[14]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation , 2005 .

[15]  David Laibson,et al.  Experienced Utility and Objective Happiness: A Moment-Based Approach , 2001 .

[16]  R. Sugden.  Public Goods and Contingent Valuation , 1999 .

[17]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences , 2001 .

[18]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance , 1982 .

[19]  J. Knetsch,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value , 1984 .

[20]  R. Thaler,et al.  Chapter 18 A survey of behavioral finance , 2003 .

[21]  R. Hogarth.  Insights in Decision Making , 1990 .

[22]  R. Thaler,et al.  Save More Tomorrow™: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  Angela Robinson,et al.  Why Did Two Theoretically Equivalent Methods Produce Two Very Different Values , 1995 .

[24]  Graham Loomes,et al.  VALUING THE PREVENTION OF NON-FATAL ROAD INJURIES: CONTINGENT VALUATION VS. STANDARD GAMBLES , 1995 .

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choices, Values, and Frames , 2000 .

[26]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Animal Spirits: Affective and Deliberative Processes in Economic Behavior , 2004 .

[27]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[28]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[29]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[30]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Graham Loomes,et al.  The Willingness to Accept Value of Statistical Life Relative to the Willingness to Pay Value: Evidence and Policy Implications , 2005 .

[32]  M. Jones-Lee,et al.  Valuation of Health Benefits Associated with Reductions in Air Pollution , 2004 .

[33]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? , 1991 .

[34]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[35]  W. Dubourg,et al.  Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity , 1994 .

[36]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Can ranking techniques elicit robust values? , 2007 .

[37]  Ilana Ritov,et al.  Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues , 1999 .

[38]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Economic Valuation With Stated Preference Techniques , 2002 .