Analysis of Invasion Dynamics of Matrix-Embedded Cells in a Multisample Format.

In vitro tests of cancer cell invasion are the "first line" tools of preclinical researchers for screening the multitude of chemical compounds or cell perturbations that may aid in halting or treating cancer malignancy. In order to have predictive value or to contribute to designing personalized treatment regimes, these tests need to take into account the cancer cell environment and measure effects on invasion in sufficient detail. The in vitro invasion assays presented here are a trade-off between feasibility in a multisample format and mimicking the complexity of the tumor microenvironment. They allow testing multiple samples and conditions in parallel using 3D-matrix-embedded cells and deal with the heterogeneous behavior of an invading cell population in time. We describe the steps to take, the technical problems to tackle and useful software tools for the entire workflow: from the experimental setup to the quantification of the invasive capacity of the cells. The protocol is intended to guide researchers to standardize experimental set-ups and to annotate their invasion experiments in sufficient detail. In addition, it provides options for image processing and a solution for storage, visualization, quantitative analysis, and multisample comparison of acquired cell invasion data.

[1]  Andrew G. Clark,et al.  Modes of cancer cell invasion and the role of the microenvironment. , 2015, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  D. L. Sean McElwain,et al.  How much information can be obtained from tracking the position of the leading edge in a scratch assay? , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  G. Devi,et al.  Three-dimensional culture systems in cancer research: Focus on tumor spheroid model. , 2016, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[4]  B. Vanloo,et al.  Inhibitory cortactin nanobodies delineate the role of NTA‐ and SH3‐domain–specific functions during invadopodium formation and cancer cell invasion , 2017, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[5]  Christine Unger,et al.  In vitro cell migration and invasion assays. , 2013, Mutation research.

[6]  Lennart Martens,et al.  An open data ecosystem for cell migration research. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[7]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Pore size variable type I collagen gels and their interaction with glioma cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[8]  G. Schneider,et al.  Computer-assisted quantification of motile and invasive capabilities of cancer cells , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Lennart Martens,et al.  An end-to-end software solution for the analysis of high-throughput single-cell migration data , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Jacco van Rheenen,et al.  Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. , 2009, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[11]  Eric Bullinger,et al.  Cell Invasion in the Spheroid Sprouting Assay: A Spatial Organisation Analysis Adaptable to Cell Behaviour , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  C. Ampe,et al.  Taking Aim at Moving Targets in Computational Cell Migration. , 2016, Trends in cell biology.

[13]  P. Panine,et al.  Fibrillogenesis in dense collagen solutions: a physicochemical study. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Enrico Gratton,et al.  Image correlation spectroscopy of multiphoton images correlates with collagen mechanical properties. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Steven C George,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of collagen gel microstructure and mechanics using multiphoton microscopy. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[16]  K. Hulkower,et al.  Cell Migration and Invasion Assays as Tools for Drug Discovery , 2011, Pharmaceutics.

[17]  O. De Wever,et al.  Single cell and spheroid collagen type I invasion assay. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[18]  Anthony P. Austin,et al.  Dual fluorescent protein reporters for studying cell behaviors in vivo , 2009, Genesis.

[19]  Lennart Martens,et al.  CellMissy: a tool for management, storage and analysis of cell migration data produced in wound healing-like assays , 2013, Bioinform..

[20]  D. Meldrum,et al.  A simple non-perturbing cell migration assay insensitive to proliferation effects , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[21]  G. O'Neill,et al.  Cooperative cell invasion: matrix metalloproteinase–mediated incorporation between cells , 2016, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Spheroid culture as a tool for creating 3D complex tissues. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[24]  Stephen J. Weiss,et al.  Protease-dependent versus -independent cancer cell invasion programs: three-dimensional amoeboid movement revisited , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  Alan J. Man,et al.  Scaffold-free three-dimensional cell culture utilizing micromolded nonadhesive hydrogels. , 2007, BioTechniques.

[26]  J. Bussink,et al.  Generation of multicellular tumor spheroids of breast cancer cells: how to go three-dimensional. , 2013, Analytical biochemistry.

[27]  Brendan M Leung,et al.  Media additives to promote spheroid circularity and compactness in hanging drop platform. , 2015, Biomaterials science.

[28]  P. Friedl,et al.  Classifying collective cancer cell invasion , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[29]  Z. Wang,et al.  3D pulmospheres serve as a personalized and predictive multicellular model for assessment of antifibrotic drugs. , 2017, JCI insight.

[30]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Quantifying the roles of cell motility and cell proliferation in a circular barrier assay , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[31]  R. Knuechel,et al.  Multicellular spheroids: a three‐dimensional in vitro culture system to study tumour biology , 1998, International journal of experimental pathology.

[32]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.