The political feasibility of Norway as the ‘green battery’ of Europe

Norway has great potential for producing pumped-storage hydropower, and the European Union (EU) hope Norway can contribute to Europe's transition to a renewable energy system by serving as a ‘green battery’. This is certainly technically feasible. However, this paper asks whether the green battery idea is politically feasible. The paper analyses four scenarios, three of which Norway serves as a green battery and one domestic. It focuses on decision-makers' and interest groups' positions on new interconnectors from Norway to continental Europe and the United Kingdom (UK), pumped-storage hydropower, and new renewable energy production in Norway. The paper argues that the present policy is characterised by incremental change—decisions about new interconnectors are made on an individual basis. Moreover the paper argues there is little reason to believe that this status quo policy will change based on any of the green battery scenarios in the near term. Still, decision-makers and interest groups are positive, in principle, towards new interconnectors and pumped-storage hydropower. Hence, Norway might become a green battery in the longer term. In the short term, however, a politically feasible contribution from Norway is balancing power through already existing hydropower capacity.

[1]  A. Gullberg,et al.  Target-group influence and political feasibility: the case of climate policy design in Europe , 2010 .

[2]  Pieter Bouwen,et al.  Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access , 2002 .

[3]  G. Majone On the notion of political feasibility , 1975 .

[4]  Andreas Dür Interest Groups in the European Union: How Powerful Are They? , 2008 .

[5]  Magnus Korpås,et al.  Pumped Storage Hydropower , 2013 .

[6]  S. Kasa Policy networks as barriers to green tax reform: The case of CO2‐taxes in Norway , 2000 .

[7]  William A. Gamson,et al.  A theory of coalition formation , 1961 .

[8]  Bart. Kerremans,et al.  Opportunity Structures in the EU Multi-Level System , 2008 .

[9]  Bjørn Erik Rasch,et al.  Det politiske landskap , 2003 .

[10]  Erik Gawel,et al.  Wie viel Europa braucht die Energiewende? , 2014, Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft.

[11]  Christian H.C.A. Henning,et al.  Policy Networks: More Than a Metaphor? , 1998 .

[12]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism , 1995, British Journal of Political Science.

[13]  Brendan Haley,et al.  Promoting low-carbon transitions from a two-world regime: Hydro and wind in Québec, Canada , 2014 .

[14]  M. Schreurs,et al.  Towards a low carbon energy future – Renewable energy cooperation between Germany and Norway , 2014 .

[15]  Alemayehu Gebremedhin,et al.  Towards a flexible energy system – A case study for Inland Norway , 2014 .