Share, comment, but do not like

The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of politicians’ facial attractiveness on their online popularity as reflected in audience engagement with their Facebook posts during the 2015 Israeli election campaign.,Using Israel’s 2015 election campaign as the case study, the authors analyzed all messages posted (n=501) on 33 politicians’ official Facebook pages during the week leading to Election Day.,The results demonstrate that audiences do engage more with posts of the more facially attractive politicians. These posts generated more shares, more comments and more participants in their discussions – but not more likes – relative to posts of less attractive politicians. These effects became even stronger when the posts were accompanied by one or more visual image, and remained significant even after controlling for other engagement predictors, such as a politician’s gender, seniority or the timing of a post’s publication.,The findings emphasize the importance of attractive looks for politicians. The findings highlight that attractive politicians’ posts attract more attention, allowing them to better spread their ideas. Thus, politicians should aim to post aesthetic images and visuals to promote better engagement with their ideas on social media.,The study expands our understanding of online presentations of politicians, focusing on the effect of politicians’ facial attractiveness on their online popularity. Recent studies have demonstrated that physically attractive politicians enjoy more and better media attention on television news, but not in non-visual media such as radio and newspapers. This effect has not been examined in the social media environment, a central arena for today’s political debates and one that involves many visual messages.

[1]  E. Segev,et al.  Invest, Engage, and Win: Online Campaigns and Their Outcomes in an Israeli Election , 2017 .

[2]  Masahiro Yamamoto,et al.  Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election , 2010 .

[3]  Y. Tsfati,et al.  Why Do Better-Looking Members of Congress Receive More Television Coverage? , 2011 .

[4]  Tom Reichert,et al.  All the News That's Fit to See? The Sexualization of Television News Journalists as a Promotional Strategy , 2007 .

[5]  Y. Tsfati,et al.  Exploring the Association between Israeli Legislators’ Physical Attractiveness and Their Television News Coverage , 2010 .

[6]  James L. Perry,et al.  Do Campaign Web Sites Really Matter in Electoral Civic Engagement? , 2008 .

[7]  Seong-Jae Min From the Digital Divide to the Democratic Divide: Internet Skills, Political Interest, and the Second-Level Digital Divide in Political Internet Use , 2010 .

[8]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[9]  Henrik Jordahl,et al.  The Looks of a Winner: Beauty, Gender and Electoral Success , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  GueorguievaVassia Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[11]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Media Participation , 2001, New Media Soc..

[12]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  The Revolution Will be Networked , 2010 .

[13]  Bart Maddens,et al.  Politicians in the News: Media or Party Logic? , 2008 .

[14]  Shelley Boulianne,et al.  Campaigns and conflict on social media: a literature snapshot , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[15]  Y. Tsfati,et al.  How does beauty shape political television news? The effect of Israeli politicians’ facial attractiveness on the tone of their news coverage , 2019 .

[16]  M. Klein,et al.  The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine‐Westphalia state election of 2005 , 2007 .

[17]  Ericka Menchen-Trevino,et al.  The extent and nature of ideological selective exposure online: Combining survey responses with actual web log data from the 2013 Israeli Elections , 2016, New Media Soc..

[18]  Moran Yarchi,et al.  Aristotelian rhetoric and Facebook success in Israel's 2013 election campaign , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[19]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[20]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Daniela V. Dimitrova,et al.  The Effects of Digital Media on Political Knowledge and Participation in Election Campaigns , 2014, Commun. Res..

[22]  Gadi Wolfsfeld,et al.  Engagement and Likeability of Negative Messages on Facebook during Israel's 2013 Elections , 2017 .

[23]  K. Barnhurst,et al.  Image-Bite News , 1997 .

[24]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Tamir Sheafer,et al.  The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003 , 2007 .

[26]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Tanya Rosenblat,et al.  Why Beauty Matters ∗ , 2005 .

[28]  Jacob R. Straus,et al.  Congressional social media communications: evaluating Senate Twitter usage , 2016, Online Inf. Rev..

[29]  Tamir Sheafer Charismatic Communication Skill, Media Legitimacy, and Electoral Success , 2008 .

[30]  Jeffrey C. Neely,et al.  The Writing on the Wall: A Content Analysis of College Students' Facebook Groups for the 2008 Presidential Election , 2010 .

[31]  Jenny Bronstein,et al.  Like me! Analyzing the 2012 presidential candidates' Facebook pages , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..

[32]  Melissa K. Surawski,et al.  The effects of physical and vocal attractiveness on impression formation of politicians , 2006 .

[33]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[34]  Tsahi Hayat,et al.  “You too, Second Screeners?” Second Screeners’ Echo Chambers During the 2016 U.S. Elections Primaries , 2017 .

[36]  Claes H. de Vreese,et al.  Good News for the Future? Young People, Internet Use, and Political Participation , 2011, Commun. Res..

[37]  Doug Jones,et al.  Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations , 1993, Human nature.

[38]  Shaul R. Shenhav,et al.  Two routes to personalized politics , 2014 .

[39]  W. Wen Facebook political communication in Taiwan: 1.0/2.0 messages and election/post-election messages , 2014 .

[40]  Michael A. Stefanone,et al.  Face off: Implications of visual cues on initiating friendship on Facebook , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Sexually selective cognition: beauty captures the mind of the beholder. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[43]  S. Church YouTube Politics: YouChoose and Leadership Rhetoric During the 2008 Election , 2010 .

[44]  Giuseppe Porro,et al.  Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens’ political preferences with an application to Italy and France , 2013, New Media Soc..

[45]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  Off the wall political discourse: Facebook use in the 2008 U.S. presidential election , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[46]  Zizi Papacharissi The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[47]  Gwendolyn Seidman,et al.  Effects of Gender and Physical Attractiveness on Visual Attention to Facebook Profiles , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[48]  Azi Lev-On,et al.  MK websites and the personalization of Israeli politics , 2011 .

[49]  N. Etcoff,et al.  Survival of the Prettiest: The Science of Beauty , 1999 .

[50]  J JohnsonThomas,et al.  The Revolution Will be Networked , 2010 .

[51]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  The digital divide shifts to differences in usage , 2014, New Media Soc..

[52]  R. Gibson,et al.  Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political Actors and Citizens in the Aftermath of the Web.2.0 Evolution , 2014 .

[53]  Nicholas A. John The Social Logics of Sharing , 2013 .

[54]  Lynda Lee Kaid,et al.  Encyclopedia of political communication , 2008 .

[55]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  Young people, social media and connective action: from organisational maintenance to everyday political talk , 2015 .

[56]  Henrik Jordahl,et al.  The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success , 2010 .

[57]  Tal Samuel-Azran,et al.  Women politicians are more engaging: male versus female politicians’ ability to generate users’ engagement on social media during an election campaign , 2018 .

[58]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Jfbter Preference , 1986 .

[59]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  It's Complicated: Facebook Users' Political Participation in the 2008 Election , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[60]  E. W. Patterson,et al.  Voters vote beautiful: The effect of physical appearance on a national election. , 1974 .

[61]  Yu-Ping Chiu,et al.  Photograph and model use within an online auction page for influencing buyer's bidding behavior , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..

[62]  Anne Helmond,et al.  The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web , 2013, New Media Soc..

[63]  Tal Samuel-Azran,et al.  Political information repertoires and political participation , 2016, New Media Soc..

[64]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  THE IMAGE AND THE VOTE MANIPULATING VOTERS' PREFERENCES , 1987 .

[65]  Jody C. Baumgartner,et al.  MyFaceTube Politics , 2010 .

[66]  Anthony M. Limperos,et al.  The 2008 Presidential Election, 2.0: A Content Analysis of User-Generated Political Facebook Groups , 2010 .

[67]  Maria Laura Sudulich,et al.  “Every Little Helps”: Cyber-Campaigning in the 2007 Irish General Election , 2010 .

[68]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Shallow Cues With Deep Effects: Trait Judgments From Faces and Voting Decisions , 2009 .

[69]  Gadi Wolfsfeld,et al.  Rhetoric Styles and Political Affiliations During Israel’s 2013 “Facebook Elections” , 2018 .

[70]  Gadi Wolfsfeld,et al.  Equalization versus Normalization: Facebook and the 2013 Israeli Elections , 2015 .

[71]  Shannon C McGregor,et al.  Personalization, social media, and voting: Effects of candidate self-personalization on vote intention , 2018, New Media Soc..

[72]  Azi Lev-On,et al.  Normalizing or equalizing? Characterizing Facebook campaigning , 2018, New Media Soc..

[73]  R. Gibson,et al.  Does Cyber‐Campaigning Win Votes? Online Communication in the 2004 Australian Election , 2005 .