Portfolio decision analysis methods in environmental decision making

Abstract Environmental modellers recurrently work with decisions where a portfolio of actions has to be formed to effectively address the overall situation at hand. When creating the portfolio, one needs to consider multiple objectives and constraints, identify promising action candidates and examine interactions among them. The area of portfolio decision analysis deals with such tasks. This paper reviews portfolio modelling approaches and software that are applicable in environmental management. A framework for environmental portfolio decision analysis is provided that consists of steps ranging from problem framing to modelling and optimization, as well as to the analysis of results. The use of this framework is demonstrated with an illustrative case describing planning of urban water services. The problem is analyzed with a recently introduced portfolio decision analysis method called Robust Portfolio Modelling, which enables the use of incomplete preference information and consequence data. This feature can be particularly useful in environmental applications.

[1]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[2]  Oswald Marinoni,et al.  Water planning in a changing climate: Joint application of cost utility analysis and modern portfolio theory , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Hans Vrolijk,et al.  Behavioral and procedural consequences of structural variation in value trees , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  R. Honert.  Improving Decision Making about Natural Disaster Mitigation Funding in Australia—A Framework , 2016 .

[5]  João Carlos Lourenço,et al.  PROBE - A multicriteria decision support system for portfolio robustness evaluation , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Gamini Herath,et al.  Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis for Integrated Catchment Management , 2007 .

[7]  Martin Weber,et al.  The Effect of Attribute Ranges on Weights in Multiattribute Utility Measurements , 1993 .

[8]  Jr Evans,et al.  A review and synthesis of OR/MS and creative problem solving (Parts 1 and 2) , 1989 .

[9]  João C. N. Clímaco,et al.  A review of interactive methods for multiobjective integer and mixed-integer programming , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  A visual reference direction approach to solving discrete multiple criteria problems , 1988 .

[11]  Christian Stummer,et al.  Interactive R&D portfolio analysis with project interdependencies and time profiles of multiple objectives , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[12]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[13]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  The threat of weighting biases in environmental decision analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Environmental Applications and Case Studies , 2011 .

[15]  W. Sharpe.  CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK* , 1964 .

[16]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  Transparent prioritisation, budgeting and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Elmar Kiesling,et al.  A multicriteria Decision Support System for Competence-Driven Project Portfolio Selection , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[19]  Jeffrey M. Keisler,et al.  Multicriteria Portfolio Decision Analysis for Project Selection , 2016 .

[20]  Zachary A. Collier,et al.  Risk-based standards: integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches , 2014, Environment Systems and Decisions.

[21]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Tuomas J. Lahtinen,et al.  Path dependence in Operational Research—How the modeling process can influence the results , 2016 .

[23]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Path dependence and biases in the even swaps decision analysis method , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  C.A. Bana e Costa,et al.  Software packages for multi-criteria resource allocation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[25]  Tuomas J. Lahtinen,et al.  Why pay attention to paths in the practice of environmental modelling? , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  R. Gregory,et al.  Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values , 1994 .

[27]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  An approach for examining the effects of preferential uncertainty on the contents of forest management plan at stand and holding level , 2008, European Journal of Forest Research.

[29]  Yael Grushka-Cockayne,et al.  An Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Improving European Air Traffic Management , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Mika Marttunen,et al.  The Decision Analysis Interview Approach in the Collaborative Management of a Large Regulated Water Course , 2008, Environmental management.

[31]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges , 2013, Climatic Change.

[32]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Creating More and Better Alternatives for Decisions Using Objectives , 2015, Oper. Res..

[33]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis , 2015, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  Kevin A. Crowe,et al.  Using portfolio theory to guide reforestation and restoration under climate change scenarios , 2008 .

[35]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies , 2007 .

[36]  Cynthia Mitchell,et al.  Costing for sustainable outcomes in urban water systems - a guidebook , 2007 .

[37]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the importance of behavioral operational research: The case of understanding and communicating about dynamic systems , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Multicriteria Portfolio Modeling for the Development of Shared Action Agendas , 2014 .

[39]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices , 2012 .

[40]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Combining a Multiattribute Value Function with an Optimization Model: An Application to Dynamic Resource Allocation for Infrastructure Maintenance , 2009, Decis. Anal..

[41]  Kamal Golabi,et al.  Selecting a Portfolio of Solar Energy Projects Using Multiattribute Preference Theory , 1981 .

[42]  Elmar Kiesling,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Two Interactive Visualization Methods for Multicriteria Portfolio Selection , 2011 .

[43]  Z. Paydar,et al.  Irrigation water management in uncertain conditions—Application of Modern Portfolio Theory , 2012 .

[44]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Selecting Attributes to Measure the Achievement of Objectives , 2005, Oper. Res..

[45]  Matteo Convertino,et al.  Portfolio Decision Analysis Framework for Value-Focused Ecosystem Management , 2013, PloS one.

[46]  Bert De Reyck,et al.  Portfolio Decision Analysis , 2011 .

[47]  Jeffrey Keisler,et al.  When to Consider Synergies In Project Portfolio Decisions , 2005 .

[48]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Behavioural issues in environmental modelling - The missing perspective , 2015, Environmental Modelling & Software.

[49]  Lisa V. Bardwell.  Problem-Framing: A perspective on environmental problem-solving , 1991 .

[50]  Christian Stummer,et al.  Research and development project selection and resource allocation: a review of quantitative modelling approaches , 1999 .

[51]  L. J. Savage,et al.  Three Problems in Rationing Capital , 1955 .

[52]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[53]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Decision Structuring Dialogue , 2015 .

[54]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons , 1995 .

[55]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Web-Based Decision Support: Creating a Culture of Applying Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Web-Supported Participation in Environmental Decision Making , 2010 .

[56]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2016 .

[57]  Juuso Liesiö,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions for Portfolio Decision Analysis , 2014, Decis. Anal..

[58]  Andrew Higgins,et al.  Evaluating water quality investments using cost utility analysis. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[59]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[60]  Suzanne A. Pierce,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders e Next generation , 2015 .

[61]  I. Linkov,et al.  Managing A Portfolio of Risks , 2010 .

[62]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Structuring resource allocation decisions: A framework for building multi-criteria portfolio models with area-grouped options , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[63]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment , 1995 .

[64]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[65]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation , 1998, Science.

[66]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Facilitated modelling in operational research , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[67]  Ahti Salo,et al.  A Resource Allocation Model for R&D Investments - A Case Study in Telecommunication Standardization , 2011 .

[68]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  Optimization in the utility maximization framework for conservation planning: a comparison of solution procedures in a study of multifunctional agriculture , 2014, PeerJ.

[69]  Andrew J. Higgins,et al.  A multi-objective model for environmental investment decision making , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[70]  Andrew J. Higgins,et al.  The multiple criteria analysis tool (MCAT): A new software tool to support environmental investment decision making , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[71]  B. Fasolo,et al.  Behavioural Issues in Portfolio Decision Analysis , 2011 .

[72]  D. N. Kleinmuntz.  Advances in Decision Analysis: Resource Allocation Decisions , 2007 .

[73]  Norman R. Baker,et al.  Economic Models for R and D Project Selection in the Presence of Project Interactions , 1984 .

[74]  Marcus Selart,et al.  Understanding the Role of Value‐Focused Thinking in Idea Management , 2011 .

[75]  Andrew Higgins,et al.  Optimisation and the Selection of Conservation Contracts , 2007 .

[76]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Multiobjective Portfolio Analysis of Dam Removals Addressing Dam Safety, Fish Populations, and Cost , 2013 .

[77]  S Pacala,et al.  Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies , 2004, Science.

[78]  R. P. Hiimiiliiinen,et al.  Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment , 1995 .