Visual mental imagery in congenital prosopagnosia

Congenital prosopagnosia (cPA) is a selective impairment in the visual learning and recognition of faces without detectable brain damage or malformation. There is evidence that it can be inherited in an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. We assessed the capacity for visual mental imagery in 53 people with cPA using an adapted Marks' VVIQ (Vividness of Visual Imaging Questionnaire). The mean score of the prosopagnosic group showed the lowest mental imagery scores ever published for a non-brain damaged group. In a subsample of 12 people with cPA, we demonstrated that the cPA is a deficit of configural face processing. We suggest that the 'VVIQ-PA' (VVIQ-Prosopagnosia) questionnaire can help to confirm the diagnosis of cPA. Poor mental imagery, a configural face processing impairment and clinical prosopagnosia should be considered as symptoms of a yet poorly understood hereditary cerebral dysfunction.

[1]  Galia Avidan,et al.  A detailed investigation of facial expression processing in congenital prosopagnosia as compared to acquired prosopagnosia , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Mariya V. Cherkasova,et al.  Face imagery and its relation to perception and covert recognition in prosopagnosia , 2003, Neurology.

[3]  I. Biederman,et al.  Less impairment in face imagery than face perception in early prosopagnosia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  D. Maurer,et al.  The effect of early visual deprivation on the development of face processing , 2002 .

[5]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Structural imaging reveals anatomical alterations in inferotemporal cortex in congenital prosopagnosia. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  S. McKelvie.  The VVIQ and beyond: Vividness and its measurement. , 1995 .

[7]  G. Kaufmann.  What is wrong with imagery questionnaires , 1981 .

[8]  H. Leder,et al.  When Feature Information Comes First! Early Processing of Inverted Faces , 2005, Perception.

[9]  G Goldenberg,et al.  The ability of patients with brain damage to generate mental visual images. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Cortical activation evoked by visual mental imagery as measured by fMRI , 2000, Neuroreport.

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Mental Imagery of Faces and Places Activates Corresponding Stimulus-Specific Brain Regions , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[13]  E. D. Haan,et al.  A familial factor in the development of face recognition deficits. , 1999 .

[14]  C. Carbon.  Famous Faces as Icons. The Illusion of Being an Expert in the Recognition of Famous Faces , 2008, Perception.

[15]  Seth E. Bouvier,et al.  Behavioral deficits and cortical damage loci in cerebral achromatopsia. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Karl Sperling,et al.  Hereditary Prosopagnosia: the First Case Series , 2007, Cortex.

[17]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  Preserved Visual Imagery and Categorization in a Case of Associative Visual Agnosia , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal Recognition of Emotion in a Prosopagnosic , 2003, Perception.

[19]  Raya Ariel,et al.  Congenital Visual Agnosia and Prosopagnosia in a Child: A Case Report , 1996, Cortex.

[20]  A. Monaco,et al.  Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language , 2002, Nature.

[21]  P. Montague,et al.  Vividness of mental imagery: Individual variability can be measured objectively , 2007, Vision Research.

[22]  E. Renzi,et al.  Disorders of Visual Recognition , 2000 .

[23]  Gail Levy-Berger,et al.  Human Experimental Psychology , 1985 .

[24]  G. Schwarzer,et al.  Gaze behaviour in hereditary prosopagnosia , 2007, Psychological research.

[25]  Marcello G P Rosa,et al.  Hierarchical development of the primate visual cortex, as revealed by neurofilament immunoreactivity: early maturation of the middle temporal area (MT). , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Irene Daum,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia: A Review , 2003, Behavioural neurology.

[27]  Stefan J. Kiebel,et al.  Simulation of talking faces in the human brain improves auditory speech recognition , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Catherine J. Mondloch,et al.  The effect of early visual deprivation on the development of face processing , 1998 .

[29]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Part-to-Whole Effects and Configural Processing in Faces , 2004 .

[30]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: an event-related brain potentials study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural foundations of imagery , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Guillaume Flandin,et al.  Retinotopic organization of visual mental images as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  D. Levine,et al.  Two visual systems in mental imagery , 1985, Neurology.

[34]  A. Monaco,et al.  A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder , 2001, Nature.

[35]  H. McConachie,et al.  Developmental Prosopagnosia. A Single Case Report , 1976, Cortex.

[36]  Juliana K. Leding,et al.  Compelling untruths: content borrowing and vivid false memories. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Face-specific configural processing of relational information. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[38]  M. Farah,et al.  EARLY COMMITMENT OF NEURAL SUBSTRATES FOR FACE RECOGNITION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[39]  C. Carbon,et al.  Neural and genetic foundations of face recognition and prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[40]  Ingo Kennerknecht,et al.  First report of prevalence of non‐syndromic hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA) , 2006, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[41]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[42]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[43]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  Faces as Objects of Non-Expertise: Processing of Thatcherised Faces in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2007, Perception.

[44]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[45]  S. McKelvie.  The Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire as a predictor of facial recognition memory performance. , 1994, British journal of psychology.

[46]  E. De Renzi.  Disorders of Visual Recognition , 2000, Seminars in neurology.

[47]  I. W. R. Bushneil,et al.  Neonatal recognition of the mother's face , 1989 .

[48]  Guido Gainotti,et al.  Face familiarity feelings, the right temporal lobe and the possible underlying neural mechanisms , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.

[49]  Joachim Bodamer,et al.  Die Prosop-Agnosie , 2004, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[50]  P J Chara,et al.  An Inquiry into the Construct Validity of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[51]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Visual Imagery of Famous Faces: Effects of Memory and Attention Revealed by fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.