Testing the Perrone and Stone (1994) Model of Heading Estimation

Human observers cannot judge heading accurately in the presence of simulated gaze rotations under many conditions [Royden et al. (1994). Vision Research, 34, 3197-3214]. They make errors in the direction of rotation with magnitudes proportional to the rotation rate. Two hypotheses have been advanced to explain this phenomenon. The extra-retinal-signal hypothesis states that the observer's estimate of gaze rotation is always based on an extra-retinal signal such as an efference copy. In the absence of such a signal, the observer assumes that no rotation has taken place and responds accordingly. The retinal-image hypothesis states that visual input dominates when the extra-retinal signal is small or absent; under this hypothesis, errors with simulated rotations are the consequence of faulty visual mechanisms. Perrone and Stone [(1994). Vision Research, 34, 2917-2938] proposed a model that purports to account for these errors using retinal-image information (optic flow) alone; its assumptions make it inefficient under some conditions. The most important of these assumptions is that the fixated target is stationary with respect to the world (the gaze-stabilization constraint). I compared the model's performance to human data from two experiments of Royden et al. [(1994). Vision Research, 34, 3197-3214]. One experiment simulated translation while tracking a target attached to the scene (gaze-stabilized), while the other simulated translation while tracking a target that was not attached (gaze-unstabilized). The incorporation of the gaze-stabilization constraint leads to a predicted asymmetry for the errors in the gaze-unstabilized experiment that is not observed in human data. I conclude that the model as it stands is not consistent with human behavior. It is possible, however, that the predicted asymmetry is masked in human data by a counteracting asymmetry in a hypothetical processing stage subsequent to the heading estimation that extrapolates the observer's future path of self-motion.

[1]  A. V. van den Berg,et al.  Why two eyes are better than one for judgements of heading , 1994, Nature.

[2]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  James A. Crowell,et al.  The perception of heading during eye movements , 1992, Nature.

[4]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Humans combine the optic flow with static depth cues for robust perception of heading , 1994, Vision Research.

[5]  K. Prazdny.  Determining The Instantaneous Direction Of Motion From Optical Flow Generated By A Curvilinearly Moving Observer , 1981, Other Conferences.

[6]  M. Banks,et al.  Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  A. V. D. Berg,et al.  Robustness of perception of heading from optic flow , 1992, Vision Research.

[8]  J H Rieger,et al.  Processing differential image motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[9]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  Analysis of misperceived observer motion during simulated eye rotations , 1994, Vision Research.

[10]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Estimating heading during eye movements , 1994, Vision Research.

[11]  O. Braddick,et al.  The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals , 1991, Vision Research.

[12]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Estimating heading during real and simulated eye movements , 1996, Vision Research.

[13]  A. V. D. Berg,et al.  Perception of heading , 1993, Nature.

[14]  A. W. Blackwell,et al.  Perception of circular heading from optical flow. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  P. Werkhoven,et al.  Visual processing of optic acceleration , 1992, Vision Research.

[16]  J. Perrone,et al.  A model of self-motion estimation within primate extrastriate visual cortex , 1994, Vision Research.

[17]  D J Hannon,et al.  Eye movements and optical flow. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[19]  Allen M. Waxman,et al.  Surface Structure and Three-Dimensional Motion from Image Flow Kinematics , 1985 .

[20]  J. Gibson,et al.  Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  Ellen C. Hildreth,et al.  Recovering heading for visually-guided navigation , 1992, Vision Research.

[22]  James A. Crowell,et al.  The effect of depth information on heading judgments , 1996 .

[23]  Daniel J. Hannon,et al.  Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow , 1988, Nature.

[24]  J T Todd,et al.  The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  W. Warren,et al.  Perception of translational heading from optical flow. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  James A. Crowell,et al.  Ideal observer for heading judgments , 1996, Vision Research.