Managed realignment The developing story of a comparatively new approach to soft engineering

Abstract Managed realignment is growing in popularity as a means of defending estuaries in the face of increasing wave activity and sea level rise. Being a comparatively new approach to coastal management, this increased usage has occurred against a background of little firm knowledge of the longer term impacts. This review gathers together a range of different research areas in an attempt to inform some of these issues. Most notable appears to be the role of pre-realignment vegetation on a site, both in terms of its role in increasing sediment accumulation as a way of enhancing new salt marsh growth, and, conversely, in its decay and generation of anoxic conditions, delaying the onset of marsh growth. Other factors include larger scale changes in soil properties, often governed by what has happened in terms of improvement during its agricultural history, size and shape of the site, and the ability to restore ecosystem functioning. Overall, the message here is that whilst realignment presents a logical and sound approach to increasing estuarine marsh loss, there are important lessons still to be learnt. Some of these can be informed from existing schemes, and some from looking at historic storm-breached sites. Overall, however, there are still major questions to be answered, with much of the required knowledge having to come from existing realignment sites at some point in the future.

[1]  M. Scrimshaw,et al.  Flood defence in the Blackwater Estuary, Essex, UK: the impact of sedimentological and geochemical changes on salt marsh development in the Tollesbury Managed Realignment site. , 2001, Marine pollution bulletin.

[2]  J. Dronkers,et al.  Tidal asymmetry and estuarine morphology , 1986 .

[3]  P. W. French,et al.  Coastal Defences: Processes, Problems and Solutions , 2001 .

[4]  E. Downing,et al.  CHANGES IN THE STRUCTURE OF MARSH SOILS FOLLOWING DRAINAGE AND ARABLE CULTIVATION , 1976 .

[5]  C. Roman,et al.  Quantifying Vegetation and Nekton Response to Tidal Restoration of a New England Salt Marsh , 2002 .

[6]  N. Pontee.  Designing sustainable estuarine intertidal habitats , 2003 .

[7]  Coastal defence : the retreat option , 1992 .

[8]  Scrimshaw,et al.  Public perceptions and attitudes towards a current managed realignment scheme: Brancaster West Marsh, North Norfolk, U.K. , 2003 .

[9]  S. Lau,et al.  Contaminant release from sediments in a coastal wetland , 1999 .

[10]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  The Recreational Value of Cley Marshes Nature Reserve: An Argument Against Managed Retreat? , 1998 .

[11]  J. Doody,et al.  Directions in European coastal management , 1995 .

[12]  A. Cundy,et al.  Sedimentary response of Pagham Harbour, southern England to barrier breaching in AD 1910 , 2002 .

[13]  O. A. L. Paramor,et al.  On the loss of saltmarshes in south-east England and methods for their restoration , 2004 .

[14]  The release of nitrous oxide from the intertidal zones of two European estuaries in response to increased ammonium and nitrate loading , 2004 .

[15]  J. Lester,et al.  A revised grain-size trend analysis program to define net sediment transport pathways , 2001 .

[16]  R. Jefferies,et al.  Destruction of wetland habitats by lesser snow geese: a keystone species on the west coast of Hudson Bay. , 1990 .

[17]  A. M. Godfrey,et al.  The United Kingdom Parliament , 2002 .

[18]  J. Callaway.  The Challenge of Restoring Functioning Salt Marsh Ecosystems , 2005 .

[19]  C. Simenstad,et al.  Contrasting Functional Performance of Juvenile Salmon Habitat in Recovering Wetlands of the Salmon River Estuary, Oregon, U.S.A. , 2002 .

[20]  Gregory D. Williams,et al.  Fish assemblage composition in constructed and natural tidal marshes of San Diego Bay: Relative influence of channel morphology and restoration history , 1999 .

[21]  V. Guida,et al.  Considerations of habitat linkages, estuarine landscapes, and the trophic spectrum in wetland restoration design , 2005 .

[22]  E. D. Seneca,et al.  Nitrogen, phosphorus and organic carbon pools in natural and transplanted marsh soils , 1988 .

[23]  T. Jickells,et al.  A review of sediment contamination by trace metals in the Humber catchment and estuary, and the implications for future estuary water quality , 2005 .

[24]  L. Levin,et al.  Colonization, succession, and nutrition of macrobenthic assemblages in a restored wetland at Tijuana Estuary, California , 2004 .

[25]  J. Lester,et al.  Geochemical Changes in Metal and Nutrient Loading at Orplands Farm Managed Retreat Site, Essex, UK (April 1995–1997) , 1999 .

[26]  E. Maltby,et al.  The short-term impact of managed realignment on soil environmental variables and hydrology , 2004 .

[27]  Odette Paramor,et al.  The effects of bioturbation and herbivory by the polychaete Nereis diversicolor on loss of saltmarsh in south‐east England , 2004 .

[28]  J. Callaway,et al.  Evaluating the progress of restored cordgrass (Spartina foliosa) marshes: Belowground biomass and tissue nitrogen , 2000 .

[29]  Philip B. Williams.  Restoring Physical Processes in Tidal Wetlands , 2001 .

[30]  K. Able,et al.  Movements and food habits of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in Delaware Bay (USA) salt marshes: comparison of a restored and a reference marsh , 2000 .

[31]  G. Bryan,et al.  Bioavailability, accumulation and effects of heavy metals in sediments with special reference to United Kingdom estuaries: a review. , 1992, Environmental pollution.

[32]  J. Lester,et al.  Solid phase partitioning of metals in managed retreat soils: field changes over the first year of tidal inundation. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Halophyte recruitment in a salt marsh restoration site , 2002 .

[34]  C. Lindau,et al.  Substrate Characterization of an Experimental Marsh and Three Natural Marshes , 1981 .

[35]  P. Jivoff,et al.  Evaluating salt marsh restoration in Delaware Bay: The response of blue crabs,Callinectes sapidus, at former salt hay farms , 2003 .

[36]  L. Boorman,et al.  Soils and ‘managed retreat’ in South East England , 2001 .

[37]  P. W. French.  Managed retreat: a natural analogue from the Medway estuary, UK , 1999 .

[38]  G. Benoit,et al.  Sedimentation rates in flow-restricted and restored salt marshes in Long Island Sound , 1999 .

[39]  C. Watson,et al.  Sedimentation–erosion dynamics of abandoned reclamations: the role of waves and tides , 2000 .

[40]  David F. Ludwig,et al.  Success criteria and adaptive management for a large-scale wetland restoration project , 1996, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[41]  Public perception of managed realignment: Brancaster West Marsh, North Norfolk, UK , 2002 .