The Outcomes of Broadcasting Self-Disclosure Using New Communication Technologies: Responses to Disclosure Vary Across One’s Social Network

Several new communication technologies have made it relatively easy for individuals to broadcast a single self-disclosure directly to almost everyone with whom they share a relationship—ranging from close friends to little-known acquaintances. Drawing from research on self-disclosure and the negativity effect, two studies were conducted to test the notion that the interpersonal and relational outcomes of broadcasting positive and negative self-disclosures are not uniform. The results of the cross-sectional survey offer evidence that the outcomes of positive and negative broadcasted disclosures vary depending on the receiver’s relationship with the discloser. The results from the experiment largely support the negativity effect explanation for differences in the outcomes of broadcasted disclosures. Relative to positive disclosures, negative broadcasted self-disclosures have a significantly greater impact on acquaintances than on friends’ perceptions of the discloser and their relationship.

[1]  L. Miller,et al.  Should I Brag? Nature and Impact of Positive and Boastful Disclosures for Women and Men , 1992 .

[2]  Yoon Hyung Choi,et al.  Self‐Disclosure Characteristics and Motivations in Social Media: Extending the Functional Model to Multiple Social Network Sites , 2015 .

[3]  Michael Smithson,et al.  Variables Affecting the Perception of Self-Disclosure Appropriateness , 1983 .

[4]  Perceived understanding and self-disclosure in the stepparent-stepchild relationship. , 1999, The Journal of psychology.

[5]  พรพรรณ ประจักษ์เนตร.  Self-Disclosure in Social Media: Extending the Functional Approach to Disclosure Motivations and Characteristics on Social Network Sites , 2015 .

[6]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[7]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Managing Impressions and Relationships on Facebook , 2013 .

[8]  Kathy Kellermann,et al.  The Negativity Effect in Interaction It's All in Your Point of View , 1989 .

[9]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Mediated disclosure on Twitter: The roles of gender and identity in boundary impermeability, valence, disclosure, and stage , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Self Book.  Self Disclosure An Experimental Analysis Of The Transparent Self , 2016 .

[11]  B. Buunk,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships , 2006 .

[12]  S. Petronio.  Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[13]  Natalya N. Bazarova.  Public Intimacy: Disclosure Interpretation and Social Judgments on Facebook , 2012 .

[14]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS social support survey. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[15]  Z. Rubin.  Measurement of romantic love. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Jessica Vitak.  The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures , 2012 .

[17]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[18]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[19]  M. Stefanone,et al.  NON-DIRECTED SELF-DISCLOSURE IN THE BLOGOSPHERE , 2011 .

[20]  Dalmas A. Taylor,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Intimacy and Valence on Self-Disclosure Reciprocity , 1986 .

[21]  Self-Disclosure with Friends Across the Life Cycles , 1986 .

[22]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Are there special effects of personalistic self-disclosure? , 1976 .

[23]  Gale G. Whiteneck,et al.  Toward a Multidimensional Approach to the Study of Self-Disclosure , 1976 .

[24]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. , 1980 .

[25]  Susan S. Hendrick,et al.  Communication, Love and Relationship Satisfaction , 1998 .

[26]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Shirley J. Gilbert,et al.  THE COMMUNICATION OF SELF‐DISCLOSURE: LEVEL VERSUS VALENCE1 , 1975 .

[28]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[29]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[30]  Namkee Park,et al.  Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Frederick Plotkin,et al.  I. SELF-DISCLOSURE , 1971 .

[32]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[33]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Email, Gender, and Personal Relationships , 2008 .

[35]  M. Allen,et al.  Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Raymond W. Preiss,et al.  Self-Disclosure Research: Knowledge Through Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[37]  James J. Bradac,et al.  Disclosing Self to Friends and Family: A Reexamination of Initial Questions. , 1981 .

[38]  Michael L. Hecht,et al.  Multivariate indices of the effects of self‐disclosure , 1979 .

[39]  Joseph P. Stokes,et al.  Self-disclosure, intimacy, and the depenetration process. , 1984 .

[40]  Pamela J. Lannutti,et al.  Classroom Communication: The Influence of Instructor Self-disclosure on Student Evaluations , 2006 .

[41]  Susan S. Hendrick.  A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. , 1988 .

[42]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[43]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[44]  Kathy Kellermann.  The negativity effect and its implications for initial interaction , 1984 .

[45]  Sonja Utz,et al.  The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Matthew M. Martin,et al.  Teacher Self-Disclosure: Amount, Relevance, and Negativity , 2008 .

[47]  L. Webb,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships , 2010 .

[48]  V. Derlega,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships: Self-Disclosure in Personal Relationships , 2006 .

[49]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[50]  P. Cozby.  Self-disclosure: a literature review. , 1973, Psychological bulletin.