论文信息 - THE PREAPPEAL CONFERENCE AND EFFECTIVE JUSTICE

THE PREAPPEAL CONFERENCE AND EFFECTIVE JUSTICE

Appellate courts—both state and federal—have experienced dramatic increases in court business since 1960. A popular policy to meet this demand has been to encourage litigants to end their appeals short of decision by the judges. Few of these programs have been evaluated; and of those few the evidence is either insufficient to support claims of effectiveness, or demonstrate that some preappeal procedures do not work.

J. Goldman

[1] Jerry Goldman,et al. A Randomization Procedure for "Trickle-Process" Evaluations , 1977 .

[2] J. Goldman,et al. Caseload Forecasting Models for Federal District Courts , 1976, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[3] I. Kaufman. The Pre-Argument Conference: An Appellate Procedural Reform , 1974 .

[4] J. G. Holmes,et al. Functions of a third party in the resolution of conflict: The role of a judge in pretrial conferences. , 1974 .

[5] M. Rosenberg. The pretrial conference and effective justice : a controlled test in personal injury litigation , 1965 .