Sponsored Data Plan

Data traffic demand over the Internet is increasing rapidly, and it is changing the pricing model between Internet service providers (ISPs), content providers (CPs) and end users. One recent pricing proposal is sponsored data plan, i.e., when accessing contents from a particular CP, end users do not need to pay for that volume of traffic consumed, but the CP will sponsor for this data consumption. In this paper, our goal is to understand the rationale behind this new pricing model, as well as its impacts to the wireless data market, in particular, who will benefit and who will be hurt from this scheme. We build a two-class service model to analyze the consumers' traffic demand under the sponsored data plan with consideration of QoS. We use a two-stage Stackelberg game to characterize the interaction between CPs and the ISP and reveal a number of important findings. Our conclusions include: 1) When the ISP's capacity is sufficient, the sponsored data plan benefits consumers and CPs in the short run, but the ISP does not have incentives to further improve its service in the long run. 2) When ISP's capacity is insufficient, the ISP and end users may achieve a win- win trade, while the ISP and CPs always compete for the revenue. 3) The sponsored data plan may enlarge the un- balance in revenue distribution between different CPs; CPs with higher unit income and poorer technology support are more likely to prefer the sponsored data plan.

[1]  Ke Xu,et al.  Can P2P Technology Benefit Eyeball ISPs? A Cooperative Profit Distribution Answer , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[2]  Ke Xu,et al.  Edge overlay multicast to support comparable multi-class services , 2008, J. High Speed Networks.

[3]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[4]  Andrew M. Odlyzko,et al.  Paris metro pricing for the internet , 1999, EC '99.

[5]  Richard T. B. Ma Subsidization Competition: Vitalizing the Neutral Internet , 2014, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[6]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Internet QoS and Regulations , 2010, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[7]  Hyoseop Lee,et al.  Calculating the benefits of sponsored data for an individual content provider , 2014, 2014 48th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS).

[8]  Dan Wang,et al.  Sponsoring content: Motivation and pitfalls for content service providers , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[9]  Alec Wolman,et al.  Splitting the bill for mobile data with SIMlets , 2013, HotMobile '13.

[10]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  Sponsoring mobile data: An economic analysis of the impact on users and content providers , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[11]  Vishal Misra,et al.  Congestion equilibrium for differentiated service classes , 2011, 2011 49th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[12]  Ke Xu,et al.  A Model Approach to the Estimation of Peer-to-Peer Traffic Matrices , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[13]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[14]  Qiong Wang,et al.  Economic models of sponsored content in wireless networks with uncertain demand , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[15]  Yuan Wu,et al.  Revenue sharing among ISPs in two-sided markets , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[16]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control , 2000, TNET.

[17]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  The Economics of Product-Line Restrictions with an Application to the Network Neutrality Debate , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[18]  A. Robert Calderbank,et al.  Network Pricing and Rate Allocation with Content Provider Participation , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[19]  Murat Yuksel,et al.  Quantifying Overprovisioning vs. Class-of-Service: Informing the Net Neutrality Debate , 2010, 2010 Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks.

[20]  LiuYing,et al.  Edge overlay multicast to support comparable multi-class services , 2008 .

[21]  WalrandJean,et al.  Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control , 2000 .

[22]  Sangtae Ha,et al.  TUBE: time-dependent pricing for mobile data , 2012, SIGCOMM '12.

[23]  Vishal Misra,et al.  Internet Economics: The Use of Shapley Value for ISP Settlement , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[24]  Andrew Odlyzko The Volume and Value of Information , 2012 .

[25]  Dan Wang,et al.  Time dependent pricing in wireless data networks: Flat-rate vs. usage-based schemes , 2014, IEEE INFOCOM 2014 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[26]  Vishal Misra,et al.  The Public Option: A Nonregulatory Alternative to Network Neutrality , 2011, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[27]  Asuman Ozdaglar,et al.  Date : July 16 , 2010 Investment in Two Sided Markets and the Net Neutrality Debate , 2010 .