Disciplinary identities: On the rhetorical paths between English and communication studies

Abstract This essay explores some rhetorical paths of thought connecting the discipline of English Studies and Speech Communication. I focus on the rhetoric of science during two periods of disciplinary development: the use of scientific rhetoric to articulate new disciplinary identities in the 1910s and the debates over the rhetorical study of science in the 1990s. The transition from the former to the latter period was significantly affected by what might be called a rhetorical hermeneutics developed around 1960 by Chaim Perelman, Hans‐Georg Gadamer, and Thomas Kuhn. The establishment of Composition Studies provides an example of the changed rhetorical context for disciplinary legitimation in the late twentieth century. The main purpose of this rhetorical history is to encourage renewed dialogue among rhetoricians studying Literature, Composition, and Communication.

[1]  Maxine Hairston,et al.  The Winds of Change: Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing. , 1982 .

[2]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[3]  Herbert W. Simons,et al.  The rhetorical turn : invention and persuasion in the conduct of inquiry , 1990 .

[4]  T. Benson.  Speech Communication in the 20th Century , 1985 .

[5]  R. Harris.  Rhetoric of Science. , 1991 .

[6]  Treasurer,et al.  SECRETARY'S REPORT. , 1958, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[7]  Andrew Thomas Weaver.  Seventeen who made history—the founders of the association , 1959 .

[8]  S. Wells.  Sweet Reason: Rhetoric and the Discourses of Modernity , 1996 .

[9]  C. H. Weaver.  A History of the International Communication Association , 1977 .

[10]  Faye Ong,et al.  English-Language Arts Content Standards for California Public Schools: Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. , 1998 .

[11]  C. H. Woolbert.  The organization of departments of speech science in universities , 1916 .

[12]  Herman Cohen,et al.  The History of Speech Communication: The Emergence of a Discipline, 1914-1945 , 1994 .

[13]  J. P. O'Grady.  Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction , 1997 .

[14]  J. Emig.  Inquiry Paradigms and Writing , 1982 .

[15]  Sharon Crowley,et al.  Composition In The University: Historical and Polemical Essays , 1998 .

[16]  Robert J. Connors,et al.  Composition Studies and Science. , 1983 .

[17]  S. Miller,et al.  Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition , 1990 .

[18]  Michael A. Overington.  The Scientific Community as Audience: Toward a Rhetorical Analysis of Science. , 1977 .

[19]  H. Simons.  Rhetorical hermeneutics and the project of globalization , 1999 .

[20]  Mary Yost.  Argument from the point‐of‐view of sociology , 1917 .

[21]  L. Phelps,et al.  Composition as a Human Science: Contributions to the Self-Understanding of a Discipline , 1988 .

[22]  D. Gaonkar.  Deconstruction and rhetorical analysis: The case of Paul de Man , 1987 .

[23]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .