Engeström’s activity theory as a tool to analyse online resources embedding academic literacies

Engestrom’s third generation activity theory, situated within sociocultural theory, can be used to analyse complexities within and surrounding academic activities, such as writing assignments or using online resources. This theory provides a tool to analyse how individual or groups use mediating artefacts (for example, an online writing resource) to achieve a specific object and outcome. This theory also provides a framework to analyse sociocultural influences of rules and norms, community and division of labour in the same activity system. Activity theory analysis describes these components and examines their interrelationship to identify affordances and contradictions within the system. As an activity system is not independent of other related activity systems, an analysis also considers co-existing related activity systems. Any contradictions can then be potentially addressed, transforming the activity and achieving improved outcomes. Activity theory can be used in conjunction with other research paradigms, such as action research. Whilst such a combination of paradigms can be viewed as controversial, some researchers use both activity theory and action research. This paper illustrates the value of using activity theory with action research to examine two networked academic activity systems –namely: 1) writing assignments, and 2) providing Academic Language and Learning (ALL) support online – which were implemented over three action research cycles. The analysis of the first action research cycle highlights the potential of activity theory to identify how contradictions lead to change for the activity and the stakeholders in the activity – both academics and students.

[1]  Lily Orland-Barak,et al.  Cycles of Action through Systems of Activity: Examining an Action Research Model through the Lens of Activity Theory , 2011 .

[2]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[3]  Yvonna S. Lincoln,et al.  The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues Sage The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues 480 £24.95 0761926941 0761926941 [Formula: see text]. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[4]  Y. Engeström.  Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[5]  Neil Murray,et al.  Good Practice Principles for English language proficiency for international students in Australian universities , 2016 .

[6]  H. Daniels.  Vygotsky and Research , 2008 .

[7]  Alisa Percy,et al.  The IDEALL approach to Learning Development: a model for fostering improved literacy and learning outcomes for students , 1998 .

[8]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[9]  G. Wells.  Integrating CHAT and Action Research , 2011 .

[10]  Y. Engeström,et al.  From Learning Environments and Implementation to Activity Systems and Expansive Learning , 2009 .

[11]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Understanding organizational learning by focusing on “activity systems” , 2000 .

[12]  Jack Whitehead,et al.  Doing and writing action research , 2009 .

[13]  Jennifer A. Silburn,et al.  Embedded academic language and learning support via an e-learning tool , 2012 .

[14]  Bridget Somekh,et al.  Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and Action Research , 2011 .

[15]  Helen Drury,et al.  Supporting student academic literacy in the disciplines using genre-based online pedagogy , 2012 .

[16]  J. Lantolf.  Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning , 2013 .

[17]  Michael D. Bush,et al.  Technology-enhanced language learning , 1997 .

[18]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[19]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Activity Theory and Education: An Introduction , 2004 .

[20]  A. Feldman,et al.  Orientations, purposes and reflection: a framework for understanding action research , 1999 .

[21]  C. Zimitat.  Teaching in transnational higher education: enhancing learning for offshore international students , 2008 .

[22]  Stephen Kemmis,et al.  What is to be done? The place of action research , 2010 .

[23]  Kris D. Gutiérrez,et al.  Cultural Ways of Learning: Individual Traits or Repertoires of Practice , 2003 .

[24]  Chik Collins.  Reflections on CHAT and Freire's Participatory Action Research From the West of Scotland: Praxis, Politics, and the “Struggle For Meaningful Life” , 2011 .

[25]  J. Brine,et al.  Students' perceptions of a selected aspect of a computer mediated academic writing program: An activity theory analysis , 2006 .

[26]  Lisa Ganobcsik-Williams.  Teaching Academic Writing in UK Higher Education: Theories, Practices and Models , 2006 .

[27]  Andrew Brown,et al.  Digital technology, communities and education , 2004 .

[28]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: themes, methods and impact on practice , 2006 .