Not toeing the number line for simple arithmetic: Two large-n conceptual replications of Mathieu et al. (Cognition, 2016, Experiment 1)

This work was supported by a Discovery Grant awarded to Jamie Campbell by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

[1]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The Organization of Spatial Reference Frames Involved in the Snarc Effect , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Heuristics and biases in mental arithmetic: revisiting and reversing operational momentum , 2018 .

[3]  Romain Mathieu,et al.  What's Behind a “+” Sign? Perceiving an Arithmetic Operator Recruits Brain Circuits for Spatial Orienting , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Xuqun You,et al.  Spatial Attention Shifts in Addition and Subtraction Arithmetic: Evidence of Eye Movement , 2019, Perception.

[5]  Min Li,et al.  Addition and Subtraction but Not Multiplication and Division Cause Shifts of Spatial Attention , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Number concepts: abstract and embodied , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Spatial grounding of symbolic arithmetic: an investigation with optokinetic stimulation , 2018, Psychological research.

[8]  E. Wagenmakers A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  F. Mast,et al.  Counting is a spatial process: evidence from eye movements , 2016, Psychological research.

[11]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  Impact of optokinetic stimulation on mental arithmetic , 2016, Psychological Research.

[12]  Wim Fias,et al.  The temporary nature of number-space interactions. , 2016, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[13]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Moving along the Number Line: Operational Momentum in Nonsymbolic Arithmetic , 2006 .

[14]  Wim Fias,et al.  Which Space for Numbers , 2018 .

[15]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Time course of overt attentional shifts in mental arithmetic: Evidence from gaze metrics , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[17]  Tom Verguts,et al.  The Time Course of Spatial Attention Shifts in Elementary Arithmetic , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors , 2014, J. Probl. Solving.

[19]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Reading direction and spatial effects in parity and arithmetic tasks , 2020, Psychological Research.

[20]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Attentional Bias Induced by Solving Simple and Complex Addition and Subtraction Problems , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  M. Masson,et al.  Bayesian alternatives to null-hypothesis significance testing for repeated-measures designs , 2016 .

[22]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Catherine Thevenot,et al.  Running the number line: Rapid shifts of attention in single-digit arithmetic , 2016, Cognition.

[24]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Spatial Interferences in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence from the Motion–Arithmetic Compatibility Effect , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  Michael E J Masson,et al.  A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[26]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Finger Tracking Reveals the Covert Stages of Mental Arithmetic , 2017, Open Mind.

[28]  Michael Andres,et al.  Shifts of Spatial Attention Underlie Numerical Comparison and Mental Arithmetic: Evidence From a Patient With Right Unilateral Neglect , 2017, Neuropsychology.

[29]  André Knops,et al.  Neurocognitive Evidence for Spatial Contributions to Numerical Cognition , 2018 .

[30]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention , 2007, Cognition.

[32]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Addition goes where the big numbers are: evidence for a reversed operational momentum effect , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  R. Whelan Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data , 2008 .

[34]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  Effects of mixing and cueing simple addition and multiplication , 2010 .

[35]  Marcie Penner-Wilger,et al.  Calculation latency: The μ of memory and the τ of transformation , 2006 .

[36]  H. Prosper Bayesian Analysis , 2000, hep-ph/0006356.

[37]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic , 2008, Cognition.

[38]  Fabrizio Doricchi,et al.  Reconstructing the origins of the space-number association: spatial and number-magnitude codes must be used jointly to elicit spatially organised mental number lines , 2018, Cognition.

[39]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis , 2012, Behavior research methods.