Situating culture in the global information sector

Presents a theoretical approach to understanding the local culture of firms in the multinational information sector. Called situating culture, this approach holds that cultural understanding is locally situated, behavioral and embedded in everyday, socially negotiated work practices. The application of this theory is provided through cases from the workplace cultures of US multinational IT firms operating in Ireland. These examples show how the local culture of a global IT firm represents the interaction of industry, corporate and national contexts. It results in locally situated work practices and distinct socially negotiated realities that ultimately impact behavior in these settings. The theoretical approach of situating culture contributes to a better understanding of contextualism in the cross‐cultural IT environment. This understanding, in turn, has implications for future cross‐cultural IS research as well as for cross‐cultural IT practice.

[1]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Operations Management: Decision Making in the Operations Function , 1981 .

[2]  C. Avgerou Information Systems and Global Diversity , 2002 .

[3]  R. Southwick,et al.  Transitioning to client/server: using a temporal framework to study organizational change , 1997 .

[4]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness , 1974 .

[5]  Eileen Moore Trauth,et al.  The Culture of an Information Economy: Influences and Impacts in the Republic of Ireland , 2000 .

[6]  R. Brightman Forget Culture: Replacement, Transcendence, Relexification , 1995 .

[7]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[8]  Allen S. Lee,et al.  Information systems and qualitative research , 1997 .

[9]  E. M. Trauth,et al.  Achieving the research goal with qualitative methods: lessons learned along the way , 1997 .

[10]  Stephen Turner,et al.  The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Tacit Knowledge and Presuppositions , 1996 .

[11]  G. Walsham Making a World of Difference: IT in a Global Context , 2001 .

[12]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[13]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[14]  Roy Wagner,et al.  The Invention of Culture , 1975 .

[15]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Information systems strategy and implementation: a case study of a building society , 1994, TOIS.

[16]  A. Kimball Romney,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[17]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Socio-technical Design: An Unfulfilled Promise or a Future Opportunity , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[18]  C. J. Meadows Globalizing Software Development , 1996 .

[19]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Technomethodology: paradoxes and possibilities , 1996, CHI.

[20]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[21]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Leapfrogging an IT labor force: multinational and indigenous perspectives , 1999 .

[22]  A. Kroeber,et al.  Culture, a critical review of concepts and definitions , 1953 .

[23]  Matthew Jones,et al.  The Moving Finger: The Use of Social Theory in WG 8.2 Conference Papers, 1975-1999 , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[24]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[25]  Yogesh Malhotra,et al.  Knowledge Assets in the Global Economy: Assessment of National Intellectual Capital , 2000, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[26]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  The interplay of information technology and the social milieu , 1997, Inf. Technol. People.

[27]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: multisite ERP implementations , 2000, CACM.

[28]  John Kidd,et al.  Management Integration through Software Applications: Japanese Manufacturing Firms in the UK Expert Control , 2000, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[29]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  The Study of Cross Cultural Management and Organization: The Future , 2001 .

[30]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Globalization and IT: Agenda for Research , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[31]  M. D. Myers,et al.  A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project , 1994 .

[32]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[33]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[34]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Process as Theory in Information Systems Research , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[35]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  The Influence of Societal Factors on the Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange in the Netherlands , 1993, Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development.

[36]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  The Role of Gender in User Resistance and Information Systems Failure , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[37]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[38]  Peter B. Smith The End of the Beginning? , 2001 .

[39]  David E. Avison,et al.  Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.2 Working Group on Information Systems Development: Human, Social, and Organizational Aspects: Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development , 1993 .

[40]  Alfred G. Meyer,et al.  Culture, a critical review of concepts and definitions , 1953 .

[41]  P. Salipante,et al.  Cultural Knowing As Practicing , 2000 .

[42]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[43]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[44]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[45]  J. Fleck Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology☆ , 1994 .

[46]  S. E. Little The Organizational Context of Systems Development , 1993, Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development.

[47]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  The Application of Neohumanist Principles in Information Systems Development , 1993, Human, Organizational, and Social Dimensions of Information Systems Development.

[48]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Trying to adopt systems development methodologies — a case‐based exploration of business users' interests , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[49]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[50]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: introduction , 2000, CACM.

[51]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Exploring analyst-client communication: using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering , 1997 .

[52]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Multisite ERP Implementations. , 2000 .

[53]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[54]  K. Lewin Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[55]  Rob Kling,et al.  What Is Social Informatics and Why Does It Matter? , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[56]  A. Escobar Encountering Development : The Making and Unmaking of the Third World , 1994 .

[57]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Redefining the social link: from baboons to humans , 1987 .

[58]  Robert Prus,et al.  Subcultural Mosaics and Intersubjective Realities: An Ethnographic Research Agenda for Pragmatizing the Social Sciences , 1997 .