Threshold Effects in Online Group Buying

This paper studies two types of threshold-induced effects: a surge of new sign-ups around the time when the thresholds of group-buying deals are reached, and a stronger positive relation between the number of new sign-ups and the cumulative number of sign-ups before the thresholds are reached than afterward. This empirical study uses a data set that records the intertemporal cumulative number of sign-ups for group-buying deals in 86 city markets covered by Groupon, during a period of 71 days when Groupon predominantly used "a deal a day" format for each local market and posted the number of sign-ups in real time. We find that the first type of threshold effect is significant in all product categories and in all markets. The second type of threshold effect varies across product categories and markets. Our results underscore the importance of considering product and market characteristics in threshold design decisions for online group buying. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2015 . This paper was accepted by Pradeep Chintagunta, marketing.

[1]  J. Stock,et al.  Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments , 1994 .

[2]  J. M. Villas-Boas,et al.  Endogeneity in Brand Choice Models , 1999 .

[3]  Dipak C. Jain,et al.  Why the Bass Model Fits without Decision Variables , 1994 .

[4]  D. Ariely,et al.  Auction fever: The effect of opponents and quasi-endowment on product valuations , 2004 .

[5]  David A. Jaeger,et al.  Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak , 1995 .

[6]  M. Nerlove,et al.  Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects , 1988 .

[7]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Group Buying: A New Mechanism for Selling Through Social Interactions , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Xitong Li,et al.  Measuring Effects of Observational Learning and Social-Network Word-of-Mouth (WOM) on the Sales of Daily-Deal Vouchers , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Krishnan S. Anand,et al.  Group Buying on the Web: A Comparison of Price-Discovery Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[10]  R. Kauffman.  1 BID TOGETHER , BUY TOGETHER : ON THE EFFICACY OF GROUP-BUYING BUSINESS MODELS IN INTERNET-BASED SELLING , 2001 .

[11]  Sonia Jaffe,et al.  To Groupon or not to Groupon: The profitability of deep discounts , 2014 .

[12]  Jian Chen,et al.  Comparison of the group-buying auction and the fixed pricing mechanism , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Jiahua Wu,et al.  Simultaneous vs. Sequential Group-Buying Mechanisms , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[14]  David Roodman,et al.  A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments , 2008 .

[15]  U. Dholakia.  How Effective are Groupon Promotions for Businesses? , 2010 .

[16]  A. Roth,et al.  Last Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Theory and Evidence from a Natural Experiment on the Internet , 2000 .

[17]  Peng Liu,et al.  Rational Herding in Microloan Markets , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Hairul Azlan Annuar,et al.  Foreign investors' interests and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from an emerging economy , 2015 .

[19]  Georgios Zervas,et al.  Daily deals: prediction, social diffusion, and reputational ramifications , 2011, WSDM '12.

[20]  D. Malhotra,et al.  Towards a competitive arousal model of decision-making: A study of auction fever in live and Internet auctions , 2005 .