Advantages and challenges in using mobile apps for field experiments: A systematic review and a case study

As smartphone’s computing power continues to grow and as mobile applications (apps) continue to dominate digital engagement, apps have become a new frontier for advancing field experiment methodology. Using apps may help researchers to scale up the reach, precisely control randomization and experiment materials, collect a variety of objective and self-reported data over time, and more conveniently replicate and adapt an experiment. We performed a systematic review on field experiments involving apps published between 2007 and 2017. Seven databases were scanned using a predefined search strategy. The database search retrieved 4,810 citations; 101 articles met the inclusion criteria. Our review suggests that scholars have only started to employ apps in field experiments in the last 4 years. Most studies only used apps as an experiment treatment instead of an experiment platform; therefore, researchers have yet to fully leverage the advantages. Almost all studies were from the health research domain and 77.2% used randomized controlled trial design. Only 7 studies utilized smartphone sensors for collecting data. Only one study reported cost and ethical concerns regarding using apps for the experiment. Given these findings, we reported a case study that targeted a minority racial group and leveraged the advantages of apps as an experiment platform and as a data collection tool to illustrate practical challenges and lessons learned regarding time, financial cost, and technical support. In conclusion, we suggest apps provide new ways to study causal mechanisms with experiment big data. Limitations of generalizability, retention, and design quality were discussed as well.

[1]  P. Lukowicz,et al.  FuturICT: Participatory computing to understand and manage our complex world in a more sustainable and resilient way , 2012 .

[2]  J. Naslund,et al.  Feasibility of popular m-health technologies for activity tracking among individuals with serious mental illness. , 2015, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[3]  P. Dayan,et al.  A computational and neural model of momentary subjective well-being , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Nils B. Weidmann,et al.  Measuring Ethnic Preferences in Bosnia and Herzegovina with Mobile Advertising , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  Open data kit sensors: mobile data collection with wired and wireless sensors , 2012, ACM DEV '12.

[6]  P. Adongo,et al.  Perceptions, Attitudes, and Experience Regarding mHealth Among Homeless Persons in New York City Shelters , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[7]  Jingwen Zhang,et al.  Support or competition? How online social networks increase physical activity: A randomized controlled trial☆ , 2016, Preventive medicine reports.

[8]  Kim Walsh-Childers,et al.  Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change , 2003 .

[9]  Hyunjoo Lee,et al.  A new dimension of the digital divide: Exploring the relationship between broadband connection, smartphone use and communication competence , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[10]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  “Kind and Grateful”: A Context-Sensitive Smartphone App Utilizing Inspirational Content to Promote Gratitude , 2016, Psychology of well-being.

[11]  D. Tate,et al.  Tweets, Apps, and Pods: Results of the 6-Month Mobile Pounds Off Digitally (Mobile POD) Randomized Weight-Loss Intervention Among Adults , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  Effects of Performance Versus Game-Based Mobile Applications on Response to Exercise , 2016, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[13]  P. Siemonsma,et al.  Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease , 2014, Interactive journal of medical research.

[14]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  Real Challenges in Mobile App Development , 2013, 2013 ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.

[15]  Lindsay Ems,et al.  Cell phone disconnection disrupts access to healthcare and health resources: A technology maintenance perspective , 2016, New Media Soc..

[16]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Social fMRI: Investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world , 2011, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[17]  Brandon Irwin,et al.  Testing the Efficacy of OurSpace, a Brief, Group Dynamics-Based Physical Activity Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Society: Build digital democracy , 2015, Nature.

[19]  D. Ben-Zeev,et al.  Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia. , 2014, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[20]  J. Jemmott,et al.  Mediation and moderation of an efficacious theory-based abstinence-only intervention for African American adolescents. , 2015, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  S. Iliffe,et al.  Bmc Medical Research Methodology Open Access the Hawthorne Effect: a Randomised, Controlled Trial , 2007 .

[22]  A. O'Leary,et al.  Theory-based behavioral intervention increases self-reported physical activity in South African men: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. , 2014, Preventive medicine.

[23]  J. Hornaday,et al.  Cancer Facts & Figures 2004 , 2004 .

[24]  R. Hornik Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change. , 2013 .

[25]  A. Gonzales The contemporary US digital divide: from initial access to technology maintenance , 2016 .

[26]  A. O'Leary,et al.  Efficacy and Mediation of a Theory-Based Physical Activity Intervention for African American Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2017, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[27]  Michael N. Huhns,et al.  Social networks for improving healthy weight loss behaviors for overweight and obese adults: A randomized clinical trial of the social pounds off digitally (Social POD) mobile app , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[28]  Donald P. Green,et al.  Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2012 .

[29]  J. Bernhardt,et al.  Behavioral Functionality of Mobile Apps in Health Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2015, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[30]  F. Vaca,et al.  New Media Use by Patients Who Are Homeless: The Potential of mHealth to Build Connectivity , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[31]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[32]  Jingwen Zhang,et al.  Efficacy and causal mechanism of an online social media intervention to increase physical activity: Results of a randomized controlled trial , 2015, Preventive medicine reports.

[33]  Jiaquan Xu,et al.  Deaths: final data for 2010. , 2013, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[34]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[35]  Tim Olds,et al.  The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[36]  Jylana L. Sheats,et al.  Harnessing Different Motivational Frames via Mobile Phones to Promote Daily Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Aging Adults , 2013, PloS one.