Atrioventricular node reentry with 'smooth' AV node function curves: a different arrhythmia substrate?

BACKGROUND Some patients with otherwise typical AV node reentry do not manifest discontinuous AV node function curves. We examined the effects of an ablation in the slow-pathway region in patients with smooth AV node function curves. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifteen patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and discontinuous AV node function curves were compared with 15 patients with AVNRT and smooth AV node function curves. In the group with discontinuous curve, the "net" anterograde effective refractory period (AERP) of the AV node increased (270 +/- 28 versus 304 +/- 37 ms, P = .03) and AERP of the remaining fast pathway decreased (367 +/- 100 versus 304 +/- 37 ms, P = .026) after the ablation. In the group with a smooth curve, the AERP of the AV node increased (266 +/- 42 versus 299 +/- 76 ms, P = .07) and the anterograde Wenckebach cycle length increased (336 +/- 66 versus 379 +/- 86 ms, P = .008) after the ablation. Retrograde conduction over the AV node was similar in both groups and was unchanged after ablation. The longest attainable AH interval (AHmax) measured during atrial extrastimulus testing was more prolonged in patients with a discontinuous curve than in patients with a smooth curve (326 +/- 48 versus 250 +/- 70 ms, P = .002). The AHmax shortened in both groups after ablation (326 +/- 48 versus 173 +/- 34 ms, P < .0001, and 250 +/- 70 versus 179 +/ 34 ms, P < .0003, respectively) and were similar. Successful ablation in the slow-pathway zone in patients with a smooth AV node function curve resulted in the loss of the "tail" of the curve representing the slow pathway. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that the smooth AV node function curve consists of two distinct components representing both fast and slow AV node pathways even when the typical discontinuity is absent.

[1]  M. Niebauer,et al.  Effects of Partial and Complete Ablation of the Slow Pathway on Fast Pathway Properties in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia , 1994, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  A. Natale,et al.  Shortening of fast pathway refractoriness after slow pathway ablation. Effects of autonomic blockade. , 1994, Circulation.

[3]  C. Morillo,et al.  Elimination of slow pathway conduction: an accurate indicator of clinical success after radiofrequency atrioventricular node modification. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Chung,et al.  Therapeutic end points for the treatment of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia by catheter-guided radiofrequency current. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Delon Wu,et al.  A simple technique for selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  A. Natale,et al.  An anatomically guided approach to atrioventricular node slow pathway ablation. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  R. Lazzara,et al.  Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  D. Commenges,et al.  Elimination of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Using Discrete Slow Potentials to Guide Application of Radiofrequency Energy , 1992, Circulation.

[9]  G. Kay,et al.  Selective Radiofrequency Ablation of the Slow Pathway for the Treatment of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Evidence for Involvement of Perinodal Myocardium Within the Reentrant Circuit , 1992, Circulation.

[10]  Delon Wu Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Pathways: A Reappraisal , 1982 .

[11]  K. Rosen,et al.  Demonstration of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways in man. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  P. Denes,et al.  Demonstration of Dual A‐V Nodal Pathways in Patients with Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia , 1973, Circulation.