Multi-species inversion and IAGOS airborne data for a better constraint of continental-scale fluxes

Abstract. Airborne measurements of CO2, CO, and CH4 proposed in the context of IAGOS (In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System) will provide profiles from take-off and landing of airliners in the vicinity of major metropolitan areas useful for constraining sources and sinks. A proposed improvement of the top-down method to constrain sources and sinks is the use of a multispecies inversion. Different species such as CO2 and CO have partially overlapping emission patterns for given fuel-combustion-related sectors, and thus share part of the uncertainties related both to the a priori knowledge of emissions and to model–data mismatch error. We use a regional modelling framework consisting of the Lagrangian particle dispersion model STILT (Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport) combined with the high-resolution (10 km × 10 km) EDGARv4.3 (Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research) emission inventory, differentiated by emission sector and fuel type for CO2, CO, and CH4, and combined with the VPRM (Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model) for biospheric fluxes of CO2. Applying the modelling framework to synthetic IAGOS profile observations, we evaluate the benefits of using correlations between different species' uncertainties on the performance of the atmospheric inversion. The available IAGOS CO observations are used to validate the modelling framework. Prior uncertainty values are conservatively assumed to be 20 %, for CO2 and 50 % for CO and CH4, while those for GEE (gross ecosystem exchange) and respiration are derived from existing literature. Uncertainty reduction for different species is evaluated in a domain encircling 50 % of the profile observations' surface influence over Europe. We found that our modelling framework reproduces the CO observations with an average correlation of 0.56, but simulates lower mixing ratios by a factor of 2.8, reflecting a low bias in the emission inventory. Mean uncertainty reduction achieved for CO2 fossil fuel emissions is roughly 38 %; for photosynthesis and respiration flux it is 41 and 44 % respectively. For CO and CH4 the uncertainty reduction is roughly 63 and 67 % respectively. Considering correlation between different species, posterior uncertainty can be reduced by up to 23 %; such a reduction depends on the assumed error structure of the prior and on the considered time frame. The study suggests a significant uncertainty constraint on regional emissions using multi-species inversions of IAGOS in situ observations.

[1]  John A. Pyle,et al.  Measurement of ozone and water vapor by Airbus in-service aircraft: The MOZAIC airborne program, an overview , 1998 .

[2]  John C. Lin,et al.  North American CO 2 exchange: inter-comparison of modeled estimates with results from a fine-scale atmospheric inversion , 2011 .

[3]  Steven Pawson,et al.  Error correlation between CO2 and CO as constraint for CO2 flux inversions using satellite data , 2009 .

[4]  Gregory J. Frost,et al.  Quantifying sources of methane using light alkanes in the Los Angeles basin, California , 2013 .

[5]  Johannes W. Kaiser,et al.  Constraining CO 2 emissions from open biomass burning by satellite observations of co-emitted species: a method and its application to wildfires in Siberia , 2014 .

[6]  F. Boschetti,et al.  On the representation of IAGOS/MOZAIC vertical profiles in chemical transport models: contribution of different error sources in the example of carbon monoxide , 2015 .

[7]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[8]  Frédéric Coulon,et al.  Review of the scientific evidence to support environmental risk assessment of shale gas development in the UK. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Anthony J. Marchese,et al.  Constructing a Spatially Resolved Methane Emission Inventory for the Barnett Shale Region. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Kevin R. Gurney,et al.  A new inversion method to calculate emission inventories without a prior at mesoscale: Application to the anthropogenic CO2 emission from Houston, Texas , 2012 .

[11]  Gregory J. Frost,et al.  Top-down estimate of surface flux in the Los Angeles Basin using a mesoscale inverse modeling technique: assessing anthropogenic emissions of CO, NOx and CO2 and their impacts , 2012 .

[12]  S. Houweling,et al.  Time-dependent atmospheric CO2 inversions based on interannually varying tracer transport , 2003 .

[13]  David G. Streets,et al.  Using CO2:CO Correlations to Improve Inverse Analyses of Carbon Fluxes , 2006 .

[14]  John C. Lin,et al.  A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model , 2003 .

[15]  P. Ciais,et al.  On the potential of the ICOS atmospheric CO 2 measurement network for estimating the biogenic CO 2 budget of Europe , 2015 .

[16]  M. Heimann,et al.  Atmospheric CO 2 inversions on the mesoscale using data-driven prior uncertainties: quantification of the European terrestrial CO 2 fluxes , 2018 .

[17]  C. Rödenbeck,et al.  The CO 2 release and Oxygen uptake from Fossil Fuel Emission Estimate (COFFEE) dataset: effects from varying oxidative ratios , 2011 .

[18]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  An inverse modeling approach to investigate the global atmospheric methane cycle , 1997 .

[19]  Martin Heimann,et al.  The global atmospheric tracer model TM3 , 1995 .

[20]  Toshinobu Machida,et al.  Worldwide Measurements of Atmospheric CO2 and Other Trace Gas Species Using Commercial Airlines , 2008 .

[21]  Martin Gallagher,et al.  Global-scale atmosphere monitoring by in-service aircraft – current achievements and future prospects of the European Research Infrastructure IAGOS , 2015 .

[22]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia in the year 2000 , 2003 .

[23]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Biogenic versus anthropogenic sources of CO in the United States , 2008 .

[24]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Fugitive emissions from the Bakken shale illustrate role of shale production in global ethane shift , 2016 .

[25]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  Aircraft-Based Estimate of Total Methane Emissions from the Barnett Shale Region. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  A. Segers,et al.  Description of current temporal emission patterns and sensitivity of predicted AQ for temporal emission patterns , 2011 .

[27]  Allison L. Dunn,et al.  A satellite‐based biosphere parameterization for net ecosystem CO2 exchange: Vegetation Photosynthesis and Respiration Model (VPRM) , 2008 .

[28]  P. Ciais,et al.  CO2 emissions from wildfires in Siberia: FRP measurement based estimates constrained by satellite and ground based observations of co-emitted species , 2013 .

[29]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  A synthesis inversion of the concentration and δ 13 C of atmospheric CO 2 , 1995 .

[30]  G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al.  Estimation of continuous anthropogenic CO 2 : model-based evaluation of CO 2 , CO, δ 13 C(CO 2 ) and Δ 14 C(CO 2 ) tracer methods , 2015 .

[31]  D. Hauglustaine,et al.  Multi-species inversion of CH4, CO and H2 emissions from surface measurements , 2008 .

[32]  S. Pandey,et al.  On the use of satellite-derived CH 4 : CO 2 columns in a joint inversion of CH 4 and CO 2 fluxes , 2015 .

[33]  D. Davydov,et al.  Continuous measurements of methane from a tower network over Siberia , 2010 .

[34]  C. Gerbig,et al.  Accounting for the effect of transport errors on tracer inversions , 2005 .

[35]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[36]  Martin Heimann,et al.  global atmospheric tracer model TM3: model description and user's manual ; release 3.8aThe , 2010 .

[37]  Hidekazu Matsueda,et al.  Aircraft observation of the seasonal variation in the transport of CO2 in the upper atmosphere , 2012 .

[38]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  Inverse modeling of the global CO cycle: 1 , 2000 .

[39]  J. B. Miller,et al.  Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability , 2006, Nature.

[40]  John C. Lin,et al.  Toward constraining regional‐scale fluxes of CO2 with atmospheric observations over a continent: 2. Analysis of COBRA data using a receptor‐oriented framework , 2003 .

[41]  J. Pyle,et al.  A cautionary tale: A study of a methane enhancement over the North Sea , 2017 .

[42]  C. Gerbig,et al.  The IAGOS-core greenhouse gas package: a measurement system for continuous airborne observations of CO2, CH4, H2O and CO , 2015 .

[43]  Jean-Noël Thépaut,et al.  The MACC reanalysis: an 8 yr data set of atmospheric composition , 2012 .

[44]  F. Carminati,et al.  Climatology of pure tropospheric profiles and column contents of ozone and carbon monoxide using MOZAIC in the mid-northern latitudes (24° N to 50° N) from 1994 to 2009 , 2013 .

[45]  C. Grimmond,et al.  Evaluating methane inventories by isotopic analysis in the London region , 2017, Scientific Reports.