Strategy for stopping failure cascades in interdependent networks

Abstract Interdependencies are ubiquitous throughout the world. Every real-world system interacts with and is dependent on other systems, and this interdependency affects their performance. In particular, interdependencies among networks make them vulnerable to failure cascades, the effects of which are often catastrophic. Failure propagation fragments network components, disconnects them, and may cause complete systemic failure. We propose a strategy of avoiding or at least mitigating the complete destruction of a system of interdependent networks experiencing a failure cascade. Starting with a fraction 1 − p of failing nodes in one network, we reconnect with a probability γ every isolated component to a functional giant component (GC), the largest connected cluster. We find that as γ increases the resilience of the system to cascading failure also increases. We also find that our strategy is more effective when it is applied in a network of low average degree. We solve the problem theoretically using percolation theory, and we find that the solution agrees with simulation results.

[1]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Robustness of a Network of Networks , 2010, Physical review letters.

[3]  Dawei Zhao,et al.  Multiple routes transmitted epidemics on multiplex networks , 2013, ArXiv.

[4]  Sergio Gómez,et al.  On the dynamical interplay between awareness and epidemic spreading in multiplex networks , 2013, Physical review letters.

[5]  H. Stanley,et al.  Structure of shells in complex networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[8]  Zonghua Liu,et al.  Explosive synchronization in adaptive and multilayer networks. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[9]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[10]  Cesar Ducruet,et al.  Inter-similarity between coupled networks , 2010, ArXiv.

[11]  L. D. Valdez,et al.  A triple point induced by targeted autonomization on interdependent scale-free networks , 2013, 1310.6345.

[12]  S. Redner,et al.  Introduction To Percolation Theory , 2018 .

[13]  S. Buldyrev,et al.  Interdependent networks with identical degrees of mutually dependent nodes. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  I. Sokolov,et al.  Reshuffling scale-free networks: from random to assortative. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  S. Havlin,et al.  Interdependent networks: reducing the coupling strength leads to a change from a first to second order percolation transition. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[16]  Jinzhi Lei,et al.  Burst synchronization transitions in a neuronal network of subnetworks. , 2011, Chaos.

[17]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[18]  L. Braunstein,et al.  Synchronization in interacting Scale Free Networks , 2015, 1505.02753.

[19]  J. S. Andrade,et al.  Avoiding catastrophic failure in correlated networks of networks , 2014, Nature Physics.

[20]  P. Steerenberg,et al.  Targeting pathophysiological rhythms: prednisone chronotherapy shows sustained efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[21]  E. Ott,et al.  Synchronization in networks of networks: the onset of coherent collective behavior in systems of interacting populations of heterogeneous oscillators. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[23]  Conrado J. Pérez Vicente,et al.  Diffusion dynamics on multiplex networks , 2012, Physical review letters.