Encoding Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Relations Without Input-Output Correlations: New Simulation Models
暂无分享,去创建一个
Stephen M. Kosslyn | Christopher F. Chabris | David P. Baker | S. Kosslyn | C. Chabris | D. P. Baker
[1] C. B. Cave,et al. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[2] R. W. Rodieck,et al. Identification, classification and anatomical segregation of cells with X‐like and Y‐like properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of old‐world primates. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.
[3] S. Kosslyn,et al. Hemispheric differences in sizes of receptive fields or attentional biases , 1994 .
[4] Edward E. Cureton,et al. Note on φ/φmax , 1959 .
[5] S. Kosslyn. Image and brain: the resolution of the imagery debate , 1994 .
[6] J. Hellige,et al. Categorical versus Coordinate Spatial Processing: Effects of Blurring and Hemispheric Asymmetry , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[7] Norman D. Cook,et al. Correlations Between Input and Output Units in Neural Networks , 1995, Cogn. Sci..
[8] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .
[9] S. Kosslyn. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[10] James L. McClelland. Explorations In Parallel Distributed Processing , 1988 .
[11] S. Kosslyn. Seeing and Imagining in the Cerebral Hemispheres: A Computational Approach , 1988 .
[12] H. Früh,et al. The cerebral hemispheres and neural network simulations: design considerations. , 1995, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
[13] Robert A. Jacobs,et al. Encoding Shape and Spatial Relations: The Role of Receptive Field Size in Coordinating Complementary Representations , 1994, Cogn. Sci..
[14] J. Hellige,et al. Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information , 1989, Memory & cognition.
[15] S. Kosslyn,et al. Neural network models as evidence for different types of visual representations , 1995 .
[16] On computational evidence for different types of spatial relations encoding: reply to Cook et al. (1995). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] Joseph B. Hellige,et al. Spatial Processing and Hemispheric Asymmetry: Contributions of the Transient/Magnocellular Visual System , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[18] Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al. Effects of isoluminant-background color on metacontrast and stroboscopic motion: Interactions between sustained (P) and transient (M) channels , 1990, Vision Research.
[19] James L. McClelland,et al. PDP models and general issues in cognitive science , 1986 .
[20] Leslie G. Ungerleider. Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .
[21] William J. Hoyer,et al. Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: A reappraisal , 1992, Memory & cognition.
[22] S. Kosslyn,et al. Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .
[24] Robert A. Jacobs,et al. On Computational Evidence for Different Types of Spatial Relations Encoding: Reply to Cook et al. (1995) , 1995 .
[25] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.