Encoding Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Relations Without Input-Output Correlations: New Simulation Models

Cook (1995) criticized Kosslyn, Chabris, Marsolek & Koenig's (1992) network simulation models of spatial relations encoding in part because the absolute position of a stimulus in the input array was correlated with its spatial relation to a landmark; thus, on at least some trials, the networks did not need to compute spatial relations. The network models reported here include larger input arrays, which allow stimuli to appear in a large range of locations with an equal probability of being above or below a “bar,” thus eliminating the confound present in earlier models. The results confirm the original hypothesis that as the size of the network's receptive fields increases, performance on a coordinate spatial relations task (which requires computing precise, metric distance) will be relatively better than on a categorical spatial relations task (which requires computing above/below relative to a landmark).

[1]  C. B. Cave,et al.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  R. W. Rodieck,et al.  Identification, classification and anatomical segregation of cells with X‐like and Y‐like properties in the lateral geniculate nucleus of old‐world primates. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Hemispheric differences in sizes of receptive fields or attentional biases , 1994 .

[4]  Edward E. Cureton,et al.  Note on φ/φmax , 1959 .

[5]  S. Kosslyn Image and brain: the resolution of the imagery debate , 1994 .

[6]  J. Hellige,et al.  Categorical versus Coordinate Spatial Processing: Effects of Blurring and Hemispheric Asymmetry , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Norman D. Cook,et al.  Correlations Between Input and Output Units in Neural Networks , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[9]  S. Kosslyn Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  James L. McClelland Explorations In Parallel Distributed Processing , 1988 .

[11]  S. Kosslyn Seeing and Imagining in the Cerebral Hemispheres: A Computational Approach , 1988 .

[12]  H. Früh,et al.  The cerebral hemispheres and neural network simulations: design considerations. , 1995, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[13]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Encoding Shape and Spatial Relations: The Role of Receptive Field Size in Coordinating Complementary Representations , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  J. Hellige,et al.  Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[15]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural network models as evidence for different types of visual representations , 1995 .

[16]  On computational evidence for different types of spatial relations encoding: reply to Cook et al. (1995). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Spatial Processing and Hemispheric Asymmetry: Contributions of the Transient/Magnocellular Visual System , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Effects of isoluminant-background color on metacontrast and stroboscopic motion: Interactions between sustained (P) and transient (M) channels , 1990, Vision Research.

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  PDP models and general issues in cognitive science , 1986 .

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[21]  William J. Hoyer,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: A reappraisal , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[22]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[24]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  On Computational Evidence for Different Types of Spatial Relations Encoding: Reply to Cook et al. (1995) , 1995 .

[25]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.