The Bias in Moment Estimators for Parameters of Drop Size Distribution Functions: Sampling from Exponential Distributions

Abstract The moment estimators frequently used to estimate parameters for drop size distribution (DSD) functions being “fitted” to observed raindrop size distributions are biased. Consequently, the fitted functions often do not represent well either the raindrop samples or the underlying populations from which the samples were taken. Monte Carlo simulations of the process of sampling from a known exponential DSD, followed by the application of a variety of moment estimators, demonstrate this bias. Skewness in the sampling distributions of the DSD moments is the root cause of this bias, and this skewness increases with the order of the moment. As a result, the bias is stronger when higher-order moments are used in the procedures. Correlations of the sample moments with the size of the largest drop in a sample (Dmax) lead to correlations of the estimated parameters with Dmax, and, in turn, to spurious correlations between the parameters. These things can lead to erroneous inferences about characteristics of...

[1]  David Atlas,et al.  Sampling errors in the measurement of rain and hail parameters , 1977 .

[2]  Robert A. Black,et al.  The Concept of “Normalized” Distribution to Describe Raindrop Spectra: A Tool for Cloud Physics and Cloud Remote Sensing , 2001 .

[3]  David R. Maidment,et al.  Handbook of Hydrology , 1993 .

[4]  Paul L. Smith.  On the graphical presentation of raindrop size data , 1982 .

[5]  Ziad S. Haddad,et al.  A new parametrization of the rain drop size distribution , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Carlton W. Ulbrich,et al.  Rainfall Microphysics and Radar Properties: Analysis Methods for Drop Size Spectra , 1998 .

[7]  J. Marshall,et al.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF RAINDROPS WITH SIZE , 1948 .

[8]  Paul L. Smith.  Raindrop Size Distributions: Exponential or Gamma—Does the Difference Matter? , 2003 .

[9]  E. Im,et al.  Parameterizing the Raindrop Size Distribution , 1996 .

[10]  C. Ulbrich.  Natural Variations in the Analytical Form of the Raindrop Size Distribution , 1983 .

[11]  Paul L. Smith,et al.  A Study of Sampling-Variability Effects in Raindrop Size Observations , 1993 .

[12]  D. Short,et al.  Evidence from Tropical Raindrop Spectra of the Origin of Rain from Stratiform versus Convective Clouds , 1996 .

[13]  J. Smith.  Marked point process models of raindrop-size distributions , 1993 .

[14]  S. C. Choi,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Parameters of the Gamma Distribution and Their Bias , 1969 .

[15]  A. Waldvogel,et al.  The N0 Jump of Raindrop Spectra , 1974 .

[16]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Just a Moment , 2013 .

[17]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar , 2001 .

[18]  J. Joss,et al.  Shapes of Raindrop Size Distributions , 1978 .

[19]  Toshiaki Kozu,et al.  Rainfall Parameter Estimation from Dual-Radar Measurements Combining Reflectivity Profile and Path-integrated Attenuation , 1991 .