Effect of the remuneration system on the general practitioner's choice between surgery consultations and home visits.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the influence of the remuneration system, municipality, doctor, and patient characteristics on general practitioners' choices between surgery and home visits. DESIGN--Prospective registration of patient contacts during one week for 116 general practitioners (GPs). SETTING--General practice in rural areas of northern Norway. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Type of GP visit (surgery v home visit). RESULTS--The estimated home visit rate was 0.14 per person per year. About 7% (range 0-39%) of consultations were home visits. Using multilevel analysis it was found that doctors paid on a "fee for service" basis tended to choose home visits more often than salaried doctors (adjusted odds ratio 1.90, 99% confidence interval 0.98, 3.69), but this was statistically significant for "scheduled" visits only (adjusted OR 4.50, 99% CI 1.67, 12.08). Patients who were older, male, and who were living in areas well served by doctors were more likely to receive home visits. CONCLUSION--In the choice between home visits and surgery consultations, doctors seem to be influenced by the nature of the remuneration when the patient's problem is not acute. Although home visiting is a function of tradition, culture, and organisational characteristics, the study indicates that financial incentives may be used to change behaviour and encourage home visiting.

[1]  I. S. Kristiansen,et al.  The general practitioner's use of time: is it influenced by the remuneration system? , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[2]  I. S. Kristiansen,et al.  Remuneration of GP services: time for more explicit objectives? A review of the systems in five industrialised countries. , 1993, Health policy.

[3]  P. Hjortdahl,et al.  The general practitioner and laboratory utilization: why does it vary? , 1992, Family practice.

[4]  Scholten,et al.  Changing remuneration systems: effects on activity in general practice. , 1990, BMJ.

[5]  D Hemenway,et al.  Physicians' responses to financial incentives. Evidence from a for-profit ambulatory care center. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  J. Sobal,et al.  House call practices among young family physicians. , 1989, The Journal of family practice.

[7]  J. Ramsdell,et al.  The Yield of a Home Visit in the Assessment of Geriatric Patients , 1989, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. , 1988 .

[9]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Response bias in a study of general practice. , 1988, Family practice.

[10]  R. A. Horne,et al.  A study of telephone advice in managing out-of-hours calls. , 1987, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[11]  J. Boan,et al.  Strained mercy : the economics of Canadian health care , 1985 .

[12]  J. Siwek.  House calls: current status and rationale. , 1985, American family physician.

[13]  J. Burton.  The House Call , 1985, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[14]  T. Rice,et al.  The Impact of Changing Medicare Reimbursement Rates on Physician-Induced Demand , 1983, Medical care.

[15]  M. Jacoby.  Changes in home visiting and night and weekend cover: the patient's view , 1982 .

[16]  Peter Tomson,et al.  General Practice Revisited , 1981 .

[17]  L. Tanum,et al.  [Home visiting service in Oslo. Who uses it?]. , 1981, Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke.

[18]  L. Boyd,et al.  Contextual Analysis: Concepts and Statistical Techniques , 1979 .

[19]  J. Maeland,et al.  Use of primary medical care: does place of residence play a role? , 1993, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[20]  D. Hall.  The off-duty arrangements of general practitioners in four European countries. , 1976, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.