Competition, cooperation and learning: the new dynamics of strategy and organisation design for the innovation net

The proliferation of breakthrough technologies and innovations among many industries has spurred the formulation of new types of competitive strategies and imperatives to learn new sources of competitive advantage. It is increasingly the case that the rising costs and risks of innovation make it increasingly difficult for any firm to undertake this knowledge-intensive endeavour completely on its own. As firms move towards establishing closer relationships with their suppliers, partners, and even their competitors, a new paradigm of strategy, value creation, and organisation design appears to be emerging. In this paper, we propose and define the concept of an "innovation net", whereby competition is based on creating new product architectures and technological platforms that often transcend the boundaries of any given industry. Within the innovation net, firms are becoming increasingly specialised in their value-creation activities, and yet simultaneously interdependent on other economic entities to shape the underlying value proposition offered to customers. Competitive advantage in the innovation net is based on learning and absorbing new sources of knowledge, no matter where they may emanate. A focus on modularity, cultivation of tacit knowledge, and learning alliances provides the key organisational design drivers that sustain competitive advantage.

[1]  Harry G. Barkema,et al.  Organizational Learning and diversification , 1994 .

[2]  David Lei,et al.  Industry evolution and competence development: the imperatives of technological convergence , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[3]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments , 1997 .

[4]  武石 彰.  Bridging inter-and intra-firm boundaries : management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 1998 .

[5]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[6]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[7]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[8]  E. H. Bowman,et al.  Strategy through the Option Lens: An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental-Choice Process , 1993 .

[9]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[10]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[11]  M. Feldman.  Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[12]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[13]  K. Clark,et al.  The power of product integrity. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[14]  Danny Miller,et al.  A Preliminary Typology of Organizational Learning: Synthesizing the Literature , 1996 .

[15]  F. Kodama.  Technology fusion and the new R & D: Harvard Business Review, 70 (4), 70–78 (July/August 1992) , 1993 .

[16]  Barbara W. Keats,et al.  Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century , 1998 .

[17]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[18]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[19]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[20]  Y. Doz,et al.  Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value Through Partnering , 1998 .

[21]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[22]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: a Structural Embeddedness Perspective , 2001 .

[23]  P. Evans,et al.  Strategy and the new economics of information. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[24]  P. Anderson,et al.  Generational Technological Change: Effects of Innovation and Local Rivalry on Performance , 1996 .

[25]  P. Ghemawat.  Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy , 1991 .

[26]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Tacit Knowledge as a Source of Competitive Advantage in the National Basketball Association , 2002 .

[27]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[28]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[29]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[30]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[31]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[32]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[33]  R. Normann,et al.  From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[34]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[35]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[36]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[37]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[39]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[40]  Hiroyuki Itami.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[41]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[42]  C R Morris,et al.  How architecture wins technology wars. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[43]  Joseph W. Leonard,et al.  Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value through Partnering , 1998 .

[44]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Unlearning the organization , 1993 .

[45]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[46]  D. Teece.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 2004 .

[47]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[48]  David Lei,et al.  Global Strategy, Competence-Building and Strategic Alliances , 1992 .

[49]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[50]  A. King,et al.  Competencies and firm performance: examining the causal ambiguity paradox , 2001 .

[51]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[52]  David Lei,et al.  Competence-building, technology fusion and competitive advantage : the key roles of organisational learning and strategic alliances , 1997 .

[53]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[54]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link : how firms compete through strategic alliances / Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. , 1993 .

[55]  R. Grant.  Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[56]  M. Schulz.  THE UNCERTAIN RELEVANCE OF NEWNESS: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS , 2001 .

[57]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[58]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  When is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation , 1999 .

[59]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Tacit Knowledge as a Source of Competitive Advantage in the National Basketball Association , 2002 .

[60]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[61]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .

[62]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[63]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[64]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[65]  Wenpin Tsai.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[66]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[67]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[68]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[69]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE, BARGAINING POWER, AND THE INSTABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES , 1997 .

[70]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[71]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  Risk Mitigation in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[72]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[73]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[74]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[75]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[76]  T. Das,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[77]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[78]  L. Argote.  Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[79]  B. Chakravarthy,et al.  The persistence of knowledge‐based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge , 2002 .

[80]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[81]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Co-Evolution of Capabilities and Industry: The Evolution of Mutual Fund Processing , 1994 .

[82]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[83]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .