Congruent population structure inferred from dispersal behaviour and intensive genetic surveys of the threatened Florida scrub‐jay (Aphelocoma cœrulescens)

The delimitation of populations, defined as groups of individuals linked by gene flow, is possible by the analysis of genetic markers and also by spatial models based on dispersal probabilities across a landscape. We combined these two complimentary methods to define the spatial pattern of genetic structure among remaining populations of the threatened Florida scrub‐jay, a species for which dispersal ability is unusually well‐characterized. The range‐wide population was intensively censused in the 1990s, and a metapopulation model defined population boundaries based on predicted dispersal‐mediated demographic connectivity. We subjected genotypes from more than 1000 individual jays screened at 20 microsatellite loci to two Bayesian clustering methods. We describe a consensus method for identifying common features across many replicated clustering runs. Ten genetically differentiated groups exist across the present‐day range of the Florida scrub‐jay. These groups are largely consistent with the dispersal‐defined metapopulations, which assume very limited dispersal ability. Some genetic groups comprise more than one metapopulation, likely because these genetically similar metapopulations were sundered only recently by habitat alteration. The combined reconstructions of population structure based on genetics and dispersal‐mediated demographic connectivity provide a robust depiction of the current genetic and demographic organization of this species, reflecting past and present levels of dispersal among occupied habitat patches. The differentiation of populations into 10 genetic groups adds urgency to management efforts aimed at preserving what remains of genetic variation in this dwindling species, by maintaining viable populations of all genetically differentiated and geographically isolated populations.

[1]  K. Crandall,et al.  Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  R. Wayne,et al.  Adaptive Units for Conservation: Population Distinction and Historic Extinctions in the Island Scrub‐Jay , 2005 .

[3]  R. L. Myers,et al.  Ecosystems of Florida. , 1991 .

[4]  Koen J. F. Verhoeven,et al.  Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power , 2005 .

[5]  M. Stephens,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. , 2003, Genetics.

[6]  P. Crochet Can measures of gene flow help to evaluate bird dispersal , 1996 .

[7]  Olivier François,et al.  Bayesian clustering algorithms ascertaining spatial population structure: a new computer program and a comparison study , 2007 .

[8]  B. Weir,et al.  ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  D. H. Vuren,et al.  Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. , 1996, Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

[10]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[11]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. , 1996 .

[12]  D. Paetkau Using Genetics to Identify Intraspecific Conservation Units: a Critique of Current Methods , 1999 .

[13]  Arnaud Estoup,et al.  Geneland: a computer package for landscape genetics , 2005 .

[14]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics , 2003 .

[15]  J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Isolation of microsatellite loci in the Florida Scrub-Jay Aphelocoma coerulescens , 2002 .

[16]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[17]  O. Berry,et al.  Can assignment tests measure dispersal? , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[18]  P. Thompson,et al.  Direct and indirect estimates of dispersal distances. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[20]  S. Funk,et al.  Ecological factors influence population genetic structure of European grey wolves , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[21]  A. Hoelzel Molecular genetic analysis of populations: a practical approach. , 1993 .

[22]  A Coulon,et al.  Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[23]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[24]  G. E. Woolfenden,et al.  Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) , 1996 .

[25]  David S. Pennock,et al.  Critique of the Evolutionarily Significant Unit as a Definition for “Distinct Population Segments” under the U.S. Endangered Species Act , 1997 .

[26]  M. Moran Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies , 2003 .

[27]  G. E. Woolfenden,et al.  Contrasting genetic structures in sister species of North American scrub-jays , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  F. Hailer,et al.  Development and multiplex PCR amplification of novel microsatellite markers in the White-tailed Sea Eagle, Haliaeetus albicilla (Aves: Falconiformes, Accipitridae) , 2005 .

[29]  Arnaud Estoup,et al.  A Spatial Statistical Model for Landscape Genetics , 2005, Genetics.

[30]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[31]  Guha Dharmarajan,et al.  Relative performance of Bayesian clustering software for inferring population substructure and individual assignment at low levels of population differentiation , 2006, Conservation Genetics.

[32]  Glen E. Woolfenden,et al.  The Florida scrub jay : demography of a cooperative-breeding bird , 1986 .

[33]  M. Baguette,et al.  Demographic versus genetic dispersal measures , 2004, Population Ecology.

[34]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Landscape patterns of Florida scrub jay habitat use and demographic success , 1995 .

[35]  O. Gaggiotti,et al.  INVITED REVIEW: What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[36]  G. Evanno,et al.  Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[37]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  Genetix v. 3.0, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome et Populations, CNRS UPR 9060, Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier. , 1997 .

[38]  Craig Moritz,et al.  Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. , 2002, Systematic biology.

[39]  J. Pritchard,et al.  Documentation for structure software : Version 2 . 3 , 2009 .

[40]  Noah A. Rosenberg,et al.  CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure , 2007, Bioinform..

[41]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Identification of management units using population genetic data. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  Ran Nathan,et al.  The challenges of studying dispersal , 2001 .

[43]  R. Waples Evolutionarily Significant Units, Distinct Population Segments, and the Endangered Species Act: Reply to Pennock and Dimmick , 1998 .

[44]  D. M. Green,et al.  Designatable Units for Status Assessment of Endangered Species , 2005 .