Effects of building orientation and heat treatment on fatigue behavior of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel

Abstract The effects of building orientation and post-fabrication heat treatment (solution annealing plus peak-aging) on fully-reversed strain-controlled fatigue behavior of 17-4 precipitation hardening (PH) stainless steel (SS) fabricated via Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is investigated. For this particular alloy, post-SLM heat treatment was found to be necessary in order to improve its tensile strength and fatigue behavior in low cycle fatigue (LCF), where the effects of microstructural impurities are less pronounced. However, the selected heat treatment was found to have detrimental influence on the SLM 17-4 PH SS high cycle fatigue (HCF) performance. The heat treatment resulted in precipitation hardening, allowing the SLM parts to become more sensitive to impurities in HCF, where the crack initiation stage dominates the total fatigue lifetime. Building orientation played a significant role on fatigue behavior in both LCF and HCF, owing to the relative orientation of deposited layers with respect to applied load. Un-melted regions (i.e. inter-layer cavities/voids), resulting from insufficient fusion or low laser penetration depth, were found to be the most detrimental type of defects on fatigue strength of SLM 17-4 PH SS due to their relatively large size and irregular shape. These specific regions that formed during fabrication of vertically-orientated samples were more detrimental than those of horizontally-built ones as they provided more stress concentration under loading, leading to lower fatigue strength. Although the process parameters were optimized based on maximizing density, the results of this study imply that this criterion is not sufficient for improving fatigue behavior, as the split-shaped un-melted regions, containing a large area with small volume, cannot be taken into account through conventional density measurements.

[1]  Chih-Kuang Lin,et al.  Effect of strain rate on high-temperature low-cycle fatigue of 17-4 PH stainless steels , 2005 .

[2]  Nima Shamsaei,et al.  Fatigue behavior and failure mechanisms of direct laser deposited Ti–6Al–4V , 2016 .

[3]  H. O. Fuchs,et al.  Metal fatigue in engineering , 2001 .

[4]  Joseph D. Bronzino,et al.  Biomechanics: Principles and Applications, Second Edition , 2007 .

[5]  A. Elwany,et al.  Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of Selective Laser Melted 17-4 PH Stainless Steel , 2015 .

[6]  Ali Fatemi,et al.  Effect of hardness on multiaxial fatigue behaviour and some simple approximations for steels , 2009 .

[7]  Chih-Kuang Lin,et al.  Influence of Frequency on High-Temperature Fatigue Behavior of 17-4 PH Stainless Steels , 2003 .

[8]  H. A. Leybold,et al.  Axial-Load Fatigue Tests on 17-7 PH Stainless Steel Under Constant-Amplitude Loading , 1960 .

[9]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  Fatigue of Materials II: Advances and Emergences in Understanding , 2016 .

[10]  Alaa Elwany,et al.  Accelerated process optimization for laser-based additive manufacturing by leveraging similar prior studies , 2017 .

[11]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Fatigue of Materials III Advances and Emergences in Understanding: Proceedings of the Third Biennial Symposium , 2014 .

[12]  Brent Stucker,et al.  Influences of Energy Density on Porosity and Microstructure of Selective Laser Melted 17-4PH Stainless Steel , 2013 .

[13]  I. Todd,et al.  Selection of steels suitable for additive layer manufacturing , 2014 .

[14]  J. Rice,et al.  Elementary engineering fracture mechanics , 1974 .

[15]  W. Luecke,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Austenitic Stainless Steel Made by Additive Manufacturing , 2014, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[16]  E. Abele,et al.  Fatigue Analysis in Selective Laser Melting: Review and Investigation of Thin-walled Actuator Housings , 2014 .

[17]  Brent Stucker,et al.  Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of 17-4 Precipitation Hardenable Steel Processed by Selective Laser Melting , 2014, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[18]  Ali Fatemi,et al.  Small fatigue crack growth under multiaxial stresses , 2014 .

[19]  R. Morgan,et al.  Density analysis of direct metal laser re-melted 316L stainless steel cubic primitives , 2004 .

[20]  T. Mower,et al.  Mechanical behavior of additive manufactured, powder-bed laser-fused materials , 2016 .

[21]  Weidong Huang,et al.  Microstructure and mechanical properties of laser forming repaired 17-4PH stainless steel , 2012 .

[22]  N. Shamsaei,et al.  An overview of Direct Laser Deposition for additive manufacturing; Part I: Transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics , 2015 .

[23]  Lawrence E Murr,et al.  Microstructures and Properties of 17-4 PH Stainless Steel Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting , 2012 .

[24]  Yung C. Shin,et al.  Predictive modeling and experimental results for residual stresses in laser hardening of AISI 4140 steel by a high power diode laser , 2009 .

[25]  William D. Callister,et al.  Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction , 1985 .

[26]  N. Shamsaei,et al.  Effects of process time interval and heat treatment on the mechanical and microstructural properties of direct laser deposited 316L stainless steel , 2015 .

[27]  Chih-Kuang Lin,et al.  Tensile and fatigue properties of 17-4 PH stainless steel at high temperatures , 2002 .

[28]  I. Lonardelli,et al.  Metastable Austenite in 17–4 Precipitation‐Hardening Stainless Steel Produced by Selective Laser Melting , 2010 .

[29]  A. Elwany,et al.  FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OF SELECTIVE LASER MELTED 17-4 PH STAINLESS STEEL , 2015 .

[30]  N. Shamsaei,et al.  An overview of Direct Laser Deposition for additive manufacturing; Part II: Mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control , 2015 .