Feasibility and long-term safety of elective Impella-assisted high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a pilot two-centre study

Objective We evaluated the acute and long-term results of the use of a new intracardiac microaxial pump, the Impella Recover LP 2.5, during elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions in a two-centre registry. Methods Ten consecutive patients with poor left ventricular function and multivessel or left main coronary artery disease were considered at high risk of haemodynamic compromise and underwent percutaneous coronary interventions with preintervention Impella implantation. Procedural complications, 30-day and 12-month clinical outcome were recorded. Left ventricular ejection fraction was assessed by echocardiography before procedure and after at least 6 months. Results The Impella was implanted before percutaneous coronary interventions by femoral approach and percutaneous coronary interventions were successfully performed (by contra lateral femoral or radial approach) in all cases. After percutaneous coronary intervention, Impella was removed in all patients, and haemostasis was obtained by prolonged manual compression or by double suture device preimplantation technique. No access-site complication was observed and no patient required transfusions. One patient died after Impella removal due to acute stent thrombosis. The other patients had an uncomplicated in-hospital course and were discharged within 5 days. At 1-year follow-up, no patient died nor suffered acute myocardial infarction, whereas two patients underwent re-percutaneous coronary intervention. Left ventricular ejection fraction at follow-up increased significantly in this study population (from 31 ± 7% to 41% ± 13%, P = 0.02). Conclusion Our results support the feasibility and safety of Impella-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in high-risk patients. Prospective randomized trials are needed to test the clinical impact of such an innovative approach.

[1]  A. M. Leone,et al.  A case of fatal stent thrombosis after Carbostent implantation: is clopidogrel alone antiplatelet therapy a safe alternative to aspirin alone antiplatelet therapy? , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  I. Iakovou,et al.  Elective versus provisional intraaortic balloon pumping in unprotected left main stenting. , 2006, American heart journal.

[3]  G. Sianos,et al.  The Recover(R) LP 2.5 catheter-mounted left ventricular assist device. , 2006, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  P. Serruys,et al.  Use of Impella Recover(R) LP 2.5 left ventricular assist device during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions; clinical, haemodynamic and biochemical findings. , 2006, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  W. Weintraub,et al.  The evolving role for a left ventricular assist device in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2006, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[7]  S. Iliceto,et al.  High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention using the intracardiac microaxial pump 'Impella recover'. , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular medicine.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  Left ventricular unloading and concomitant total cardiac output increase by the use of percutaneous impella recover LP 2.5 assist device during high‐risk coronary intervention , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  J. Maessen,et al.  Miniature intracardiac assist device provides more effective cardiac unloading and circulatory support during severe left heart failure than intraaortic balloon pumping. , 2004, Chest.

[10]  E. Verbeken,et al.  Left ventricular support by catheter-mounted axial flow pump reduces infarct size. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  C. Di Mario,et al.  Elective versus provisional intra-aortic balloon pumping in high-risk percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 2003, American heart journal.

[12]  S D Moulopoulos,et al.  Counterpulsation: historical background, technical improvements, hemodynamic and metabolic effects. , 1994, Cardiology.

[13]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Prediction of risk for hemodynamic compromise during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.