H2 and H∞ control options for the combined attitude and thermal control system (CATCS)

The combined attitude and thermal control system (CATCS) combines the conventional attitude control and thermal control subsystems. Its principle is based on circulating a heat conducting fluid inside a closed duct wielding the excess onboard heat in order to produce the attitude control torques. Previously only the proportional-integral (PI) controller has been tested for CATCS. In this paper two other control options for CATCS were designed based on the H2 and H∞ control methods to improve the attitude control performance of a small satellite. The control gain matrix with the minimum cost function is obtained by solving the Riccati equation and fed back to the system in order to achieve the system’s performance. The designed controllers can efficiently control the roll, pitch and yaw satellite attitudes. Simulations for the two techniques were carried out using Matlab and Simulink for ideal and non-ideal system models. Results show that the H2 controller has a better attitude control performance over the H∞ controller and PI controller itself.

[1]  Sahjendra Singh,et al.  Nonlinear Adaptive Attitude Control of Spacecraft , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[2]  Asad Azemi,et al.  Using MATLAB in a graduate electrical engineering optimal control course , 1997, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change.

[3]  Jyotirmay Gadewadikar,et al.  H -infinity output -feedback control: Application to unmanned aerial vehicle , 2007 .

[4]  Jan Tommy Gravdahl,et al.  Spacecraft attitude control using explicit model predictive control , 2005, Autom..

[5]  Eric N. Johnson,et al.  Development of a Variable Inertia Reaction Wheel System for Spacecraft Attitude Control , 2004 .

[6]  Li-Qun Chen,et al.  Attitude control of a rigid spacecraft with two momentum wheel actuators using genetic algorithm , 2004 .

[7]  Di Yang,et al.  Fine attitude control by reaction wheels using variable-structure controller , 2003 .

[8]  Renuganth Varatharajoo,et al.  Approach for Combining Spacecraft Attitude and Thermal Control Systems , 2003 .

[9]  J.-R. Tsai,et al.  Active control for initial attitude acquisition using magnetic torquers , 2005 .

[10]  Li-Chun Lai,et al.  Time-optimal maneuvering control of a rigid spacecraft , 2007 .

[11]  Rafael Wisniewski,et al.  Fully magnetic attitude control for spacecraft subject to gravity gradient , 1999, Autom..

[12]  F. L. Markley,et al.  IFAC World Congress, Beijing, China, July 1999 , 1999 .

[13]  Chang-Hee Won.  Comparative study of various control methods for attitude control of a LEO satellite , 1999 .

[14]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  State-space solutions to standard H/sub 2/ and H/sub infinity / control problems , 1989 .

[15]  Yew-Wen Liang,et al.  Study of VSC Reliable Designs With Application to Spacecraft Attitude Stabilization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[16]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  State-space solutions to standard H2 and H∞ control problems , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.