Partial Component Exchange of a Non-infected Inflatable Penile Prosthesis is Associated with a Higher Complication Rate.

[1]  Zachary R. Dionise,et al.  Infection rates following urologic prosthetic revision without replacement of any device components compared to partial or complete device exchange: a single-center retrospective cohort study. , 2022, International journal of impotence research.

[2]  S. Hudak,et al.  Distance from Critical Pelvic Structures: Radiographic Comparison of High Submuscular and Space of Retzius IPP Reservoir Placement Techniques , 2021, Urology.

[3]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes. , 2019, The journal of sexual medicine.

[4]  M. Bolat,et al.  Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation. , 2019, The journal of sexual medicine.

[5]  Anton Wintner,et al.  Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Considerations in Revision Surgery , 2019, Current Urology Reports.

[6]  G. Henry,et al.  Biofilm and Infectious Agents Present at the Time of Penile Prosthesis Revision Surgery: Times Are a Changing. , 2017, Sexual medicine reviews.

[7]  L. Rangel,et al.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter Mechanical Failures-Is it Better to Replace the Entire Device or Just the Malfunctioning Component? , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[8]  Lee Cheng Zhao,et al.  Safety of the "drain and retain" option for defunctionalized urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs during artificial urinary sphincter and inflatable penile prosthesis revision surgery: 5-year experience. , 2013, Urology.

[9]  T. Köhler,et al.  Intentionally retained pressure-regulating balloon in artificial urinary sphincter revision. , 2013, The journal of sexual medicine.

[10]  B. Kava,et al.  Contemporary revision penile prosthesis surgery is not associated with a high risk of implant colonization or infection: a single-surgeon series. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[11]  J. Hotaling,et al.  Isolated infection of a decommissioned penile prosthesis reservoir with Actinomyces neuii. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[12]  R. Abouassaly,et al.  Risk of infection with an antibiotic coated penile prosthesis at device replacement for mechanical failure. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Brian R. Evans,et al.  Biofilm formation on clinically noninfected penile prostheses. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Georges Karam,et al.  Management of artificial urinary sphincter dysfunction. , 2004, European urology.

[15]  Ryan P Terlecki,et al.  Fate of the retained reservoir after replacement of 3-piece penile prosthesis. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[16]  C. Dhabuwala,et al.  Comparison of satisfaction rates and erectile function in patients treated with sildenafil, intracavernous prostaglandin E1 and penile implant surgery for erectile dysfunction in urology practice. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[17]  K. Angermeier,et al.  Artificial urinary sphincter troubleshooting. , 2001, Urology.

[18]  D. Montague,et al.  Cultures from genitourinary prostheses at reoperation: questioning the role of Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic infection. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[19]  M. Cleves,et al.  An outcomes analysis of over 200 revision surgeries for penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter study. , 2012, The journal of sexual medicine.

[20]  M. Cleves,et al.  Revision washout decreases penile prosthesis infection in revision surgery: a multicenter study. , 2005, The Journal of urology.