Factors explaining the academic success of second-year economics students: an exploratory analysis

The factors influencing academic success of first-year Economics students have received much attention from researchers. Very little attention, however, has been given to the determinants of success of senior Economics students. In the USA, Graunke and Woosley (2005: 367) indicate that college sophomores (second years) face academic difficulties, but this receives little attention in the literature. Economics is an elective subject for second-year students at Stellenbosch University. The academic performance of the second-year students has shown a decline, as compared to the first-year Economics performance and the faculty’s average performance. An observed phenomenon at Stellenbosch University is the poor attendance of lecture and tutorials by second year students, some of the factors than can perhaps explain why students perform poorly. This phenomenon may be explained in part by second year students losing interest in academic activities, focusing on other social commitments. This study investigates the academic success of second-year Economics students. It adds to the existing literature on the factors affecting the academic success of Economics students by focusing on the second-year students (a much neglected group in empirical studies, particularly in South Africa). The empirical analyses confirm some of the existing findings in the literature, namely that lecture and tutorial attendance are important contributors to academic success. We also find that as students progress to Economics at the second-year level, their performance in individual matriculation subjects is less relevant, except for those students who had taken Additional Mathematics. However, the matriculation aggregate mark is significant in explaining the academic performance, in a non-linear way. An important finding is that non-White students tend to perform more poorly in essay writing (one of the components of the course mark in the second year) than White students.

[1]  Leonard C. Smith,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF PEDAGOGIC INTERVENTIONS IN FIRST-YEAR ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MAINSTREAM COURSES IN MICROECONOMICS , 2009 .

[2]  Petronella Horn,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE IMPACT OF TUTORIALS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF ECONOMICS STUDENTS , 2009 .

[3]  I. Barron.  An exploration of the factors that affect the ethnic identities of a group of three and four year old children , 2008 .

[4]  Petronella Horn,et al.  Do tutorial programmes influence the performance of Economics students? A case study of the Economics 178 course at Stellenbosch University , 2008 .

[5]  Steven E. Gump.  Classroom Research in a General Education Course: Exploring Implications Through an Investigation of the Sophomore Slump , 2007, The Journal of General Education.

[6]  Pamela M. Schmitt,et al.  The Performance of Economics Graduates over the Entire Curriculum: The Determinants of Success , 2006 .

[7]  Jimmie Gahagan,et al.  The Second-Year Experience: Turning Attention to the Academy's Middle Children , 2006 .

[8]  Alex van der Merwe,et al.  Identifying Some Constraints In First Year Economics Teaching And Learning At A Typical South African University Of Technology , 2006 .

[9]  Kudayja Parker,et al.  The Effect Of Student Characteristics On Achievement In Introductory Microeconomics In South Africa , 2006 .

[10]  Alvin G. Wint,et al.  Determinants of students' performance at university: reflections from the caribbean , 2006 .

[11]  Cornéa van Walbeek,et al.  DOES LECTURE ATTENDANCE MATTER? SOME OBSERVATIONS FROM A FIRST-YEAR ECONOMICS COURSE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN , 2005 .

[12]  Sherry A. Woosley,et al.  An Exploration of the Factors that Affect the Academic Success of College Sophomores. , 2005 .

[13]  L. C. Smith,et al.  A multivariate evaluation of mainstream and academic development courses in first-year microeconomics at the University of Cape Town : a comparative study , 2007 .

[14]  Luca Stanca,et al.  The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics , 2004 .

[15]  Ann Kirby,et al.  The Effect of Attendance on Grade for First Year Economics Students in University College Cork , 2003 .

[16]  Lamont A. Flowers.  Developing Purpose in College: Differences between Freshmen and Seniors * , 2002 .

[17]  P. Friedman,et al.  Why Students Do and Do Not Attend Classes , 2001 .

[18]  C. Watts,et al.  HIV/AIDS Prevention and Care Interventions in Sub‐Saharan Africa: An Econometric Analysis of the Costs of Scaling‐Up , 2000 .

[19]  L. Edwards,et al.  An Econometric Evaluation of Academic Development Programmes in Economics , 2000 .

[20]  C. Okpala,et al.  Academic Efforts and Study Habits Among Students in a Principles of Macroeconomics Course , 2000 .

[21]  B. Greene,et al.  Verbal Abilities, Gender, and the Introductory Economics Course: A New Look at an Old Assumption , 1997 .

[22]  D. Romer,et al.  Do Students Go to Class? Should They? , 1993 .

[23]  Gregory S. Blimling.  A Meta-Analysis of the Influence of College Residence Halls on Academic Performance. , 1989 .

[24]  E. Hanushek.  Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Educational Production Functions , 1979 .

[25]  John J. Siegfried,et al.  Research on Teaching College Economics: A Survey , 1979 .

[26]  Kenneth Brandt,et al.  Relation of Student Residence to Academic Performance in College. , 1970 .