The impact of geopolitical risk, governance, technological innovations, energy use, and foreign direct investment on CO_2 emissions in the BRICS region

[1]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Pollution Haven or Halo? How European countries leverage FDI, energy, and human capital to alleviate their ecological footprint , 2023, Gondwana Research.

[2]  M. Usman,et al.  Heterogeneous role of energy utilization, financial development, and economic development in ecological footprint: How far away are developing economies from developed ones , 2023, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[3]  N. Saqib,et al.  Assessing the Connection between Nuclear and Renewable Energy on Ecological Footprint within the EKC Framework: Implications for Sustainable Policy in Leading Nuclear Energy-producing Countries , 2023, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.

[4]  M. Usman,et al.  Achieving ecological sustainability through technological innovations, financial development, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption in developing European countries , 2023, Gondwana Research.

[5]  M. Usman,et al.  Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist? , 2023, Resources Policy.

[6]  A. Chandio,et al.  The dynamic change trends and internal driving factors of green development efficiency: robust evidence from resource-based Yellow River Basin cities , 2023, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  M. Usman,et al.  Do all renewable energy stocks react to the war in Ukraine? Russo-Ukrainian conflict perspective , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[8]  M. Usman,et al.  Revisiting EKC hypothesis in context of renewable energy, human development and moderating role of technological innovations in E-7 countries? , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[9]  M. Usman,et al.  Investigating the effects of natural resources and institutional quality on CO_2 emissions during globalization mode in developing countries , 2022, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[10]  A. Chandio,et al.  Towards sustainable food production: What role ICT and technological development can play for cereal production in Asian-7 countries? , 2022, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[11]  M. Usman,et al.  How Do Institutional Quality, Natural Resources, Renewable Energy, and Financial Development Reduce Ecological Footprint without Hindering Economic Growth Trajectory? Evidence from China , 2022, Sustainability.

[12]  N. Saqib,et al.  Oil rents, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in 13 OPEC member economies: Asymmetry analyses , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[13]  M. Usman,et al.  Are Mercosur economies going green or going away? An empirical investigation of the association between technological innovations, energy use, natural resources and GHG emissions , 2022, Gondwana Research.

[14]  R. Kousar,et al.  Heterogeneous effects of renewable energy and structural change on environmental pollution in Africa: Do natural resources and environmental technologies reduce pressure on the environment? , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[15]  M. Usman,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Ecological Footprint Using Nuclear Energy, Industrialization, Fossil Fuels and Foreign Direct Investment , 2022, Energies.

[16]  N. Saqib,et al.  Influence of energy structure, environmental regulations and human capital on ecological sustainability in EKC framework; evidence from MINT countries , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[17]  M. Usman,et al.  Investigation on the causality relationship between environmental innovation and energy consumption: Empirical evidence from EU countries , 2022, Energy & Environment.

[18]  N. Saqib,et al.  The determinants of life expectancy and environmental degradation in Pakistan: evidence from ARDL bounds test approach , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[19]  M. Tanveer,et al.  Rule of Law, Control of Corruption and CO2 Emissions in Pakistan , 2022, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.

[20]  M. Tariq,et al.  Are globalization, urbanization, and energy consumption cause carbon emissions in SAARC region? New evidence from CS-ARDL approach , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[21]  Joshua Sunday Riti,et al.  Geopolitical risk and environmental degradation in BRICS: Aggregation bias and policy inference , 2022, Energy Policy.

[22]  Kangyin Dong,et al.  Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO 2 emissions in the G7 countries: The moderating role of social globalisation , 2022, Sustainable Development.

[23]  N. Saqib,et al.  An Empirical Study on the Impact of Energy Poverty on Carbon Intensity of the Construction Industry: Moderating Role of Technological Innovation , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[24]  M. Usman,et al.  Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: Does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  N. Saqib,et al.  Modelling the effect of renewable energy and public-private partnership in testing EKC hypothesis: Evidence from methods moment of quantile regression , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[26]  N. Saqib.  Green energy, non-renewable energy, financial development and economic growth with carbon footprint: heterogeneous panel evidence from cross-country , 2022, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[27]  A. Alola,et al.  Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk surge CO2 emissions? New insights from panel quantile regression approach , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[28]  R. Inglesi‐Lotz,et al.  Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis amidst geopolitical risk: Global evidence using bootstrap ARDL approach , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[29]  N. Saqib.  ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM MENA REGION , 2021, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.

[30]  M. Usman,et al.  Do industrialization, economic growth and globalization processes influence the ecological footprint and healthcare expenditures? Fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for countries with the highest healthcare expenditures , 2021 .

[31]  Lijuan Chen.  How CO2 emissions respond to changes in government size and level of digitalization? Evidence from the BRICS countries , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[32]  S. Sarwar,et al.  The role of governance indicators to minimize the carbon emission: a study of Saudi Arabia , 2021, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

[33]  H. Lean,et al.  Do Economic Policy Uncertainty and Geopolitical Risk Lead to Environmental Degradation? Evidence from Emerging Economies , 2021, Sustainability.

[34]  J. Hussain,et al.  The repercussions of financial development and corruption on energy efficiency and ecological footprint: Evidence from BRICS and next 11 countries , 2021 .

[35]  Anwar Khan,et al.  Exploring the role of finance, natural resources, and governance on the environment and economic growth in South Asian countries , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[36]  M. Usman,et al.  What determines environmental deficit in Asia? Embossing the role of renewable and non-renewable energy utilization , 2021 .

[37]  N. Apergis,et al.  Does geopolitical risk escalate CO2 emissions? Evidence from the BRICS countries , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[38]  S. Shah,et al.  Impact of stock market, renewable energy consumption and urbanization on environmental degradation: new evidence from BRICS countries , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[39]  F. Adedoyin,et al.  Do energy use and economic policy uncertainty affect CO2 emissions in China? Empirical evidence from the dynamic ARDL simulation approach , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[40]  A. Isiksal.  Testing the effect of sustainable energy and military expenses on environmental degradation: evidence from the states with the highest military expenses , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[41]  A. Alola,et al.  Crude oil production in the Persian Gulf amidst geopolitical risk, cost of damage and resources rents: Is there asymmetric inference? , 2020 .

[42]  Zeeshan Khan,et al.  Eco-innovation and energy productivity: New determinants of renewable energy consumption. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  M. Chishti,et al.  Effect of foreign direct investment on CO2 emission with the role of globalization, institutional quality with pooled mean group panel ARDL , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[44]  U. Alola,et al.  The (Un)sticky role of exchange and inflation rate in tourism development: insight from the low and high political risk destinations , 2020, Current Issues in Tourism.

[45]  M. Usman,et al.  The role of financial development, tourism, and energy utilization in environmental deficit: evidence from 20 highest emitting economies , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[46]  Anis Omri,et al.  Good governance for sustainable development goals: Getting ahead of the pack or falling behind? , 2020, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[47]  M. Azam,et al.  Dynamic nexus among tourism, corruption, democracy and environmental degradation: a panel data investigation , 2020, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[48]  Turgay Avcí,et al.  Does causality between geopolitical risk, tourism and economic growth matter? Evidence from Turkey , 2020 .

[49]  M. Bildirici.  Terrorism, environmental pollution, foreign direct investment (FDI), energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidences from China, India, Israel, and Turkey , 2020 .

[50]  I. Ozturk,et al.  The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[51]  J. Raji,et al.  The role of financial development and corruption in environmental degradation of Sub-Saharan African countries , 2020 .

[52]  M. Bein,et al.  The relationship between good governance and CO2 emissions in oil- and non-oil-producing countries: a dynamic panel study of sub-Saharan Africa , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[53]  E. Rasoulinezhad,et al.  Geopolitical Risk and Energy Transition in Russia: Evidence from ARDL Bounds Testing Method , 2020, Sustainability.

[54]  Khalid Latif,et al.  Relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions: does governance matter? , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[55]  S. Akadiri,et al.  Economic and social determinants of carbon emissions: Evidence from organization of petroleum exporting countries , 2020 .

[56]  M. A. Baloch,et al.  Analyzing the role of governance in CO2 emissions mitigation: The BRICS experience , 2019 .

[57]  Khalid Khan,et al.  Does geopolitical risk strengthen or depress oil prices and financial liquidity? Evidence from Saudi Arabia , 2019, Energy.

[58]  Abdul Rahim Ridzuan,et al.  THE IMPACT OF CORRUPTION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY IN THE DEVELOPING COUNTRIES OF ASEAN–3: THE APPLICATION OF THE BOUND TEST , 2019, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy.

[59]  Avik Sinha,et al.  Impact of corruption in public sector on environmental quality: Implications for sustainability in BRICS and next 11 countries , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[60]  Irwan Shah Zainal Abidin,et al.  THE IMPACT OF DEMOCRACY, CORRUPTION AND MILITARY EXPENDITURE ON ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION: EVIDENCE FROM TOP SIX ASEAN COUNTRIES , 2019, Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews.

[61]  Serdar Cop,et al.  The spillover effects of tourism receipts, political risk, real exchange rate, and trade indicators in Turkey , 2019, International Journal of Tourism Research.

[62]  Jiaxing Pang,et al.  Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from the agricultural sector of China's main grain-producing areas. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[63]  رضا اخباری,et al.  Does the effect of corruption on carbon emissions vary in different countries? , 2019, Environmental Sciences.

[64]  J. A. Puppim de Oliveira.  Intergovernmental relations for environmental governance: Cases of solid waste management and climate change in two Malaysian States. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[65]  Per G. Fredriksson,et al.  Corruption and environmental regulatory policy in the United States: Does trust matter? , 2018, Resource and Energy Economics.

[66]  N. Saqib.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Gulf Cooperation Council Countries , 2018 .

[67]  Y. Hao,et al.  The impact of environmental regulation, shadow economy, and corruption on environmental quality: Theory and empirical evidence from China , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[68]  Asma Sghaier,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Corruption, Economic Growth, Environmental Degradation, and Energy Consumption: a Panel Analysis in MENA Region , 2018 .

[69]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  The moderating role of corruption between economic growth and CO2 emissions: Evidence from BRICS economies , 2018 .

[70]  Renjin Sun,et al.  Do natural gas and renewable energy consumption lead to less CO2 emission? Empirical evidence from a panel of BRICS countries , 2017 .

[71]  Meenakshi Rishi,et al.  Determinants of CO2 emission for post-Soviet Union independent countries , 2017 .

[72]  Ching-Fu Chen,et al.  The Effects of Tourism on Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions: A Comparison between Developed and Developing Economies , 2017 .

[73]  Liangsheng Du,et al.  Effects of energy production and CO2 emissions on economic growth in Iran: ARDL approach , 2017 .

[74]  Manuchehr Irandoust,et al.  The renewable energy-growth nexus with carbon emissions and technological innovation: Evidence from the Nordic countries , 2016 .

[75]  M. Abid.  Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa economies , 2016 .

[76]  R. Brännlund,et al.  Energy Efficient R&D Investment and Aggregate Energy Demand: Evidence from OECD Countries , 2015 .

[77]  R. Begum,et al.  Dynamic impact of household consumption on its CO2 emissions in Malaysia , 2015, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[78]  J. Rejeb,et al.  The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Corruption in the Mena Region , 2015 .

[79]  Hoda Hassaballa.  The Effect of Corruption on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the Mena Region , 2015 .

[80]  Anis Omri.  Co2 Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in MENA Countries: Evidence from Simultaneous Equations Models , 2013 .

[81]  Alexander Chudik,et al.  Large Panel Data Models with Cross-Sectional Dependence: A Survey , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[82]  Abdul Jalil,et al.  The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis , 2011 .

[83]  Mikkel Jørgensen,et al.  The teraton challenge. A review of fixation and transformation of carbon dioxide , 2010 .

[84]  M. Pesaran.  A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence , 2003 .

[85]  Donggyu Sul,et al.  Dynamic Panel Estimation and Homogeneity Testing Under Cross Section Dependence , 2002 .

[86]  Andrew T. Levin,et al.  Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties , 2002 .

[87]  Peter Pedroni,et al.  Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[88]  B. Baltagi,et al.  Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels , 2001 .

[89]  Peter Pedroni,et al.  Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels , 2001 .

[90]  R. Stott,et al.  The World Bank , 2008, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[91]  Chihwa Kao,et al.  Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data When the Cross-Section and Time-Series Dimensions are Comparable , 1996 .

[92]  Huanming Wang,et al.  The moderating role of governance environment on the relationship between risk allocation and private investment in PPP markets: Evidence from developing countries , 2019, International Journal of Project Management.

[93]  S. Raza,et al.  Dynamic Relationship between Urbanization, Energy Consumption and Environmental Degradation in Pakistan: Evidence from Structure Break Testing , 2016 .

[94]  Eyup Dogan,et al.  CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.