Factors Affecting Perceived Persuasiveness of a Behavior Change Support System

Despite the popularity of the technology acceptance and adoption studies, adoption of persuasive systems has not been investigated from a theoretical perspective. In the present study, we put forward a novel approach for investigating behavior change support systems (BCSS) through a theoretical model. We constructed and tested (two measurement points; 172 subjects) a model predicting perceived persuasiveness and actual usage of a behavior change support system. Results from a rigorous PLS-SEM analysis support most of our hypotheses about factors affecting persuasiveness and actual usage. The proffered model can be considered as a meta-model, i.e. it may be utilized in a multitude of domains, such as health behaviors (as in the present study), safety and education. The present study extends the extant (rather limited) body of knowledge regarding the factors contributing to engagement with behavior change support systems.

[1]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Interactive Decision Aids for Consumer Decision Making in E-Commerce: The Influence of Perceived Strategy Restrictiveness , 2009, MIS Q..

[2]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[3]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Passengers' Safety in Aircraft Evacuations: Employing Serious Games to Educate and Persuade , 2012, PERSUASIVE.

[5]  C. Peter Herman,et al.  Undieting: A program to help people stop dieting , 1992 .

[6]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[7]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Individual information systems as a research arena , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Personalizaion and Familiarity on Trust and Adoption of Recommendation Agents , 2006, MIS Q..

[9]  W. Crano,et al.  Attitudes and persuasion. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[11]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[12]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[14]  Graham Pervan,et al.  Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  A foundation for the study of behavior change support systems , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  HCI Research: Future Challenges and Directions , 2010 .

[17]  Straub,et al.  Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[18]  Richard E Petty,et al.  The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Elizabeth Sillence,et al.  A framework for understanding trust factors in web-based health advice , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Thorsten Staake,et al.  Green IS Design and Energy Conservation: An Empirical Investigation of Social Normative Feedback , 2011, ICIS.

[21]  B. J. Fogg Healthy Living with Persuasive Technologies : Framework , Issues , and Challenges , 2009 .

[22]  Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al.  Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[24]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  AgarwalRitu,et al.  Reconceptualizing compatability beliefs in technology acceptance research , 2006 .

[26]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Adoption and Use of IT Artifacts: A New Interaction-Centric Model for the Study of User-Artifact Relationships , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  B. Kahn,et al.  The Influence of Positive Affect on Variety Seeking among Safe, Enjoyable Products , 1993 .

[29]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact , 2007, MIS Q..

[30]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: Design and evaluation of social behaviors , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Johan F. Hoorn,et al.  Affective affordances: Improving interface character engagement through interaction , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Varun Grover,et al.  Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications , 2011, MIS Q..

[33]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Behavior Change Support Systems: A Research Model and Agenda , 2010, PERSUASIVE.

[35]  Jonathan Klein,et al.  This computer responds to user frustration , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[36]  Ned Kock,et al.  Using WarpPLS in e-Collaboration Studies: Mediating Effects, Control and Second Order Variables, and Algorithm Choices , 2011, Int. J. e Collab..

[37]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[38]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Toward a Generic Model of Trust for Electronic Commerce , 2000, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[39]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Jonathan Klein,et al.  This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[41]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Chanthika Pornpitakpan The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence , 2004 .

[43]  Andrea Everard,et al.  How Presentation Flaws Affect Perceived Site Quality, Trust, and Intention to Purchase from an Online Store , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[45]  Confirmation Model UNDERSTANDING INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONTINUANCE: AN EXPECTATION- , 2001 .

[46]  Karen L. Courtney,et al.  Brief Review: Defining Obtrusiveness in Home Telehealth Technologies: A Conceptual Framework , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[47]  Alain Forget,et al.  Persuasion for Stronger Passwords: Motivation and Pilot Study , 2008, PERSUASIVE.

[48]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Process and Outcome Similarity on Users' Evaluations of Decision Aids , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[49]  Maurits Kaptein,et al.  Adaptive persuasive messages in an e-commerce setting: the use of persuasion profiles , 2011, ECIS.

[50]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Design Principles for Special Purpose, Embodied, Conversational Intelligence with Environmental Sensors (SPECIES) Agents , 2011 .

[51]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Introduction to the AIS THCI Special Issue on Design Research in Human-Computer Interaction , 2011 .

[52]  AgarwalRitu,et al.  Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns , 2009 .

[53]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[54]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Adoption of Electronic Health Records in the Presence of Privacy Concerns: The Elaboration Likelihood Model and Individual Persuasion , 2009, MIS Q..

[55]  Kalle Lyytinen HCI Research: Future Directions that Matter , 2010 .

[56]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[57]  David Robins,et al.  Aesthetics and credibility in web site design , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[58]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[59]  David V. Keyson,et al.  Persuasive Technology to Shape Social Beliefs: A Case of Persuasive Health Information Systems for Rural Women in India , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[60]  W. Wood Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[61]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Influencing Individually: Fusing Personalization and Persuasion , 2012, TIIS.

[62]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[63]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[64]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[65]  Sumaira Malik,et al.  Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: a systematic literature review of online health-related support groups. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.