Neurochemical and electrophysiological diagnosis of reversible neurotoxicity in earthworms exposed to sublethal concentrations of CL-20

Background, aim, and scopeHexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20) is a relatively new energetic compound sharing some degree of structural similarity with hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), a known neurotoxic compound. Previously, we demonstrated using a noninvasive electrophysiological technique that CL-20 was a more potent neurotoxicant than RDX to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. In the present study, we investigated the effect of CL-20 exposure and subsequent recovery on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) to further define the mechanism of reversible neurotoxicity of CL-20 in E. fetida.Materials and methodsWe used a noninvasive electrophysiological technique to evaluate neurotoxicity in CL-20-treated worms, and then measured how such exposures altered levels of whole-body mAChR in the same animals.Results and discussionA good correlation exists between these two types of endpoints. Effect on mAChR levels was most prominent at day 6 of exposure. After 7 days of recovery, both conduction velocity and mAChR were significantly restored. Our results show that sublethal concentrations of CL-20 significantly reduced mAChR levels in a concentration- and duration-dependent manner, which was accompanied with significant decreases in the conduction velocity of the medial and lateral giant nerve fibers. After 7-day post exposure recovery, worms restored both neurochemical (mAChR) and neurophysiological (conduction velocity) endpoints that were reduced during 6-day exposures to CL-20 concentrations from 0.02 to 0.22 µg/cm2.Conclusions and perspectivesOur findings support the idea that CL-20 induced neurotoxic effects are reversible, and suggest that CL-20 neurotoxicity may be mediated through the cholinergic system. Future studies will investigate other neurotransmission systems such as GABA, glutamate, and monoamine. Ion channels in the nerve membrane should be examined to further define the precise mechanisms underlying CL-20 neurotoxicity.

[1]  F. Crocker,et al.  Biotic and abiotic degradation of CL-20 and RDX in soils. , 2005, Journal of environmental quality.

[2]  K. Oka,et al.  Identification of two types of synaptic activity in the earthworm nervous system during locomotion , 2003, Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Wess Molecular biology of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1996, Critical reviews in neurobiology.

[4]  Edward J Perkins,et al.  Comparative neurotoxicity of two energetic compounds, hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane and hexahydro‐1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazine, in the earthworm Eisenia fetida , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  O. Uchitel,et al.  Modulation of ACh release by presynaptic muscarinic autoreceptors in the neuromuscular junction of the newborn and adult rat , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  P. Gong,et al.  Uptake of hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20) by the earthworm Eisenia fetida through dermal contact. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  G. Ravagnan,et al.  Expression of nerve growth factor-like polypeptides and immunoreactivity related to the two types of neurotrophin receptors in earthworm tissues , 2002, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[8]  Heidi Sjursen Konestabo,et al.  Recovery of cholinesterase activity in the earthworm Eisenia fetida Savigny following exposure to chlorpyrifos , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[9]  J. Hámori,et al.  Reorganization of monoaminergic systems in the earthworm, Eisenia fetida, following brain extirpation. , 2003, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Comparative experimental biology.

[10]  R. D. Evans,et al.  Methylmercury impairs components of the cholinergic system in captive mink (Mustela vison). , 2006, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[11]  Mark S. Johnson,et al.  Subacute toxicity of oral 2,6‐dinitrotoluene and 1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐triazine (RDX) exposure to the northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[12]  L. Avery,et al.  Starvation activates MAP kinase through the muscarinic acetylcholine pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans pharynx. , 2006, Cell metabolism.

[13]  A. Eldefrawi,et al.  Neurotransmitter receptors as targets for pesticides. , 1983, Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes.

[14]  L. Costa,et al.  Neurotoxicity of pesticides: a brief review. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[15]  Barry A. Trimmer,et al.  Current excitement from insect muscarinic receptors , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  J. Hámori,et al.  Distribution and action of some putative neurotransmitters in the stomatogastric nervous system of the earthworm, Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta, Annelida) , 2001, Journal of neurocytology.

[17]  D. Ray,et al.  A reassessment of the neurotoxicity of pyrethroid insecticides. , 2006, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[18]  D. Ray,et al.  Biochemical markers of neurotoxicity. A review of mechanistic studies and applications. , 1996, Human & experimental toxicology.

[19]  N. Basu,et al.  Biochemical Markers of Neurotoxicity in Wildlife and Human Populations: Considerations for Method Development , 2005, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[20]  Cori Bargmann Chemosensation in C. elegans. , 2006, WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology.