The Practical Application of Clinical Prediction Rules: A Commentary Using Case Examples in Surgical Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Study Design Commentary. Objective This commentary aims to discuss the practical applications of a clinical prediction rule (CPR) developed to predict functional status in patients undergoing surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Methods Clinical cases from the AOSpine CSM-North America study were used to illustrate the application of a prediction rule in a surgical setting and to highlight how this CPR can be used to ultimately enhance patient care. Results A CPR combines signs and symptoms, patient characteristics, and other predictive factors to estimate disease probability, treatment prognosis, or risk of complications. These tools can influence allocation of health care resources, inform clinical decision making, and guide the design of future research studies. In a surgical setting, CPRs can be used to (1) manage patients’ expectations of outcome and, in turn, improve overall satisfaction; (2) facilitate shared decision making between patient and physician; (3) identify strategies to optimize surgical results; and (4) reduce heterogeneity of care and align surgeons’ perceptions of outcome with objective evidence. Conclusions Valid and clinically-relevant CPRs have tremendous value in a surgical setting.

[1]  James G. Adams,et al.  An early look at performance on the emergency care measures included in Medicare's hospital inpatient Value-Based Purchasing Program. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  C. Fisher,et al.  The Impact of Patient Expectations on Outcome Following Treatment for Spinal Trauma: Part 1: What Are Spine Surgeons Telling Their Patients? , 2010, Spine.

[3]  S. Emery,et al.  Impact of Smoking on the Outcome of Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis with Interbody or Strut-Grafting , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Pathophysiology and Natural History of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2013, Spine.

[5]  J. Moossy,et al.  Multimodal assessment after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[6]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  H. Akiyama,et al.  [On cervical spondylotic myelopathy]. , 1966, No to shinkei = Brain and nerve.

[8]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Systematic Review of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics That Affect Treatment Decision Making and Predict Clinical Outcome in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2013, Spine.

[9]  Sakae Tanaka,et al.  Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Score and Modified JOA (mJOA) Score for the Assessment of Cervical Myelopathy: A Multicenter Observational Study , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  P. Arnold,et al.  Differential Diagnosis for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Literature Review , 2013, Spine.

[11]  W. Kim,et al.  The model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) , 2007, Hepatology.

[12]  M. Fehlings,et al.  A clinical prediction model to assess surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: internal and external validations using the prospective multicenter AOSpine North American and international datasets of 743 patients. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  E. Draper,et al.  APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system , 1985, Critical care medicine.

[14]  M. Fehlings,et al.  A clinical prediction model to determine outcomes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: data from the prospective, multi-center AOSpine North America study. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathogenesis , 2015, Spine.

[16]  C. Bolger,et al.  A Global Perspective on the Outcomes of Surgical Decompression in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Results From the Prospective Multicenter AOSpine International Study on 479 Patients , 2015, Spine.

[17]  C. Howie,et al.  What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement , 2013, BMJ Open.

[18]  M. Fehlings,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy , 2015, Spine.

[19]  S. Helgerson Clinical Epidemiology: How to Do Clinical Practice Research , 2006 .